• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于加强兽医领域公私合作伙伴关系协作过程的评估工具。

An evaluation tool to strengthen the collaborative process of the public-private partnership in the veterinary domain.

机构信息

UMR ASTRE, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, INRAE, Montpellier, France.

Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health (FARAH), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 28;16(5):e0252103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252103. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252103
PMID:34048436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8162688/
Abstract

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in the veterinary domain are widely implemented worldwide and can help to strengthen the capacities of Veterinary Services. Few analyses have been made of these initiatives. This study is aimed at developing an evaluation tool based on participatory approaches and focusing on the quality of PPP processes in the veterinary domain. The tool was divided into ten sections relevant to PPP process organisation and activities. The 44 evaluation criteria and six quality attributes (operationality, relevance, acceptability, inclusiveness, adaptability, and stability) were identified based on literature review and case-study application. The tool was adjusted during four regional PPP training workshops bringing together stakeholders from both public and private sectors. Finally, the tool was validated through an experts' elicitation process and applied in the field in Paraguay. The tool was developed in a non-normative perspective to help the partners adapt the PPP to their specific context, to maximize the opportunities and minimize the risks of such collaborations, and to formulate adapted recommendations to strengthen and improve the PPP collaborative process and thus the outcomes. In an ex-ante perspective, this tool would also help public and private actors to engage and develop a PPP process following the best possible practices. The aim of this tool is to help decision making in terms of PPP development and implementation in the veterinary domain to ensure the added value and relevance of such a collaborative approach in different countries worldwide.

摘要

公私合作伙伴关系(PPPs)在兽医领域得到广泛实施,可以帮助加强兽医服务的能力。很少有分析这些举措。本研究旨在开发一种基于参与式方法的评估工具,重点关注兽医领域 PPP 过程的质量。该工具分为十个部分,与 PPP 过程组织和活动相关。44 项评估标准和六项质量属性(可操作性、相关性、可接受性、包容性、适应性和稳定性)是基于文献回顾和案例研究应用确定的。该工具在四次区域 PPP 培训研讨会上进行了调整,这些研讨会汇集了来自公共和私营部门的利益相关者。最后,通过专家征询过程对该工具进行了验证,并在巴拉圭进行了实地应用。该工具是在非规范的角度下开发的,旨在帮助合作伙伴根据其具体情况调整 PPP,最大程度地利用此类合作的机会并最小化风险,并制定适应性建议,以加强和改进 PPP 合作过程,从而提高成果。从预先的角度来看,该工具还将帮助公共和私营部门的参与者参与并发展 PPP 流程,以遵循最佳实践。该工具的目的是帮助在兽医领域做出 PPP 发展和实施的决策,以确保这种合作方法在世界不同国家的附加值和相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/31f054389cc5/pone.0252103.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/fc42b4bee627/pone.0252103.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/a67316699d35/pone.0252103.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/e82a9fbe1cbd/pone.0252103.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/31f054389cc5/pone.0252103.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/fc42b4bee627/pone.0252103.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/a67316699d35/pone.0252103.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/e82a9fbe1cbd/pone.0252103.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1649/8162688/31f054389cc5/pone.0252103.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
An evaluation tool to strengthen the collaborative process of the public-private partnership in the veterinary domain.一种用于加强兽医领域公私合作伙伴关系协作过程的评估工具。
PLoS One. 2021 May 28;16(5):e0252103. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252103. eCollection 2021.
2
Evaluation of Public-Private Partnership in the Veterinary Domain Using Impact Pathway Methodology: In-depth Case Study in the Poultry Sector in Ethiopia.使用影响路径方法评估兽医领域的公私伙伴关系:埃塞俄比亚家禽部门的深入案例研究。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Feb 22;9:735269. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.735269. eCollection 2022.
3
Typological analysis of public-private partnerships in the veterinary domain.兽医领域公私合作伙伴关系的类型分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 31;14(10):e0224079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224079. eCollection 2019.
4
Health system's barriers hindering implementation of public-private partnership at the district level: a case study of partnership for improved reproductive and child health services provision in Tanzania.卫生系统阻碍地区层面公私伙伴关系实施的障碍:以坦桑尼亚改善生殖和儿童健康服务提供的伙伴关系为例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1831-6.
5
Understanding the complex relationships among actors involved in the implementation of public-private mix (PPM) for TB control in India, using social theory.运用社会理论理解印度实施结核公私混合(PPM)控制中涉及的各行为体之间复杂的关系。
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 7;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0785-1.
6
Experts' perspectives on the application of public-private partnership policy in prevention of road traffic injuries.专家对公私伙伴关系政策在预防道路交通伤害中的应用的看法。
Chin J Traumatol. 2020 Jun;23(3):152-158. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
7
Role of public-private partnerships in achieving UNAIDS HIV treatment targets.公私伙伴关系在实现联合国艾滋病规划署艾滋病治疗目标中的作用。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 18;19(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3744-z.
8
Key recommendations to strengthen public-private partnership for adolescent health in resource constrained settings: Formative qualitative inquiry in Mongolia, Myanmar and the Philippines.在资源有限的环境中加强青少年健康领域公私伙伴关系的关键建议:在蒙古、缅甸和菲律宾开展的形成性定性调查。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Aug 5;15:100242. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100242. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Opinions and evaluations of stakeholders in the implementation of the public-private partnership (PPP) model in integrated health campuses (city hospitals) in Turkey.土耳其综合医疗园区(城市医院)公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)模式实施中的利益相关者的意见和评价。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019 Jan;34(1):e241-e263. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2644. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
10
Public-private partnership models in France and in Europe.法国及欧洲的公私合作模式。
Therapie. 2006 Jul-Aug;61(4):325-34, 313-23. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2006059.

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholder analysis to improve the national control program of cystic echinococcosis in Morocco.利益相关者分析以改善摩洛哥包虫病国家控制规划。
Prev Vet Med. 2021 Jan;186:105227. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105227. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
2
The RISKSUR EVA tool (Survtool): A tool for the integrated evaluation of animal health surveillance systems.RISKSEVA 工具(Survtool):一种用于综合评估动物健康监测系统的工具。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Dec 1;173:104777. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104777. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
Typological analysis of public-private partnerships in the veterinary domain.
兽医领域公私合作伙伴关系的类型分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 31;14(10):e0224079. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224079. eCollection 2019.
4
One Health Surveillance: A Matrix to Evaluate Multisectoral Collaboration.“同一健康”监测:评估多部门合作的矩阵
Front Vet Sci. 2019 Apr 24;6:109. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00109. eCollection 2019.
5
The Added-Value of Using Participatory Approaches to Assess the Acceptability of Surveillance Systems: The Case of Bovine Tuberculosis in Belgium.运用参与式方法评估监测系统可接受性的附加价值:以比利时牛结核病为例。
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 27;11(7):e0159041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159041. eCollection 2016.
6
Applying participatory approaches in the evaluation of surveillance systems: A pilot study on African swine fever surveillance in Corsica.在监测系统评估中应用参与式方法:科西嘉岛非洲猪瘟监测的一项试点研究
Prev Vet Med. 2015 Dec 1;122(4):389-98. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
7
Surveillance systems evaluation: a systematic review of the existing approaches.监测系统评估:现有方法的系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2015 May 1;15:448. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1791-5.
8
Bridging disciplines, knowledge systems and cultures in pest management.在病虫害管理中弥合学科、知识体系和文化之间的差距。
Environ Manage. 2014 Feb;53(2):429-440. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0180-z.
9
OASIS: an assessment tool of epidemiological surveillance systems in animal health and food safety.OASIS:动物健康和食品安全流行病学监测系统评估工具。
Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Oct;139(10):1486-96. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811000161. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
10
Ethics in public health research: a research protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of public-private partnerships as a means to improve health and welfare systems worldwide.公共卫生研究中的伦理:一项评估公私伙伴关系作为改善全球卫生和福利系统手段的有效性的研究方案。
Am J Public Health. 2007 Jan;97(1):19-25. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.075614. Epub 2006 Nov 30.