• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

估算北欧流域的社会效益:使用最终生态系统服务框架的综合方法。

Estimating societal benefits from Nordic catchments: An integrative approach using a final ecosystem services framework.

机构信息

Faculty of Environmental Sciences and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.

Natural Resources Institute Finland, Oulu, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0252352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252352. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0252352
PMID:34061872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8168860/
Abstract

Nordic catchments provide a variety of ecosystem services, from harvestable goods to mitigation of climate change and recreational possibilities. Flows of supplied ecosystem services depend on a broad range of factors, including climate, hydrology, land management and human population density. The aims of this study were: 1) to quantify the total economic value (TEV) of consumed ecosystem services across Nordic catchments, 2) to explain variation in ecosystem service value using socio-geographic and natural factors as explanatory variables in multiple linear regression, and 3) to determine which societal groups benefit from these ecosystem services. Furthermore, we tested the scientific rigour of our framework based on the concept of final ecosystem services (FES). We used a spatially explicit, integrative framework for ecosystem services quantification to compile data on final ecosystem services provision from six catchments across Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. Our estimates showed a broad variation in TEV and in the proportion contributed by separate services, with the highest TEV of €7,199 ± 4,561 ha-1 y-1 (mean ± standard deviation) in the Norwegian Orrevassdraget catchment, and the lowest TEV of €183 ± 517 ha-1 y-1 in the Finnish Simojoki catchment. The value of material services was dependent on both geographic factors and land management practices, while the value of immaterial services was strongly dependent on population density and the availability of water. Using spatial data on land use, forest productivity and population density in a GIS analysis showed where hotspots of ecosystem services supply are located, and where specific stakeholder groups benefit most. We show that our framework is applicable to a broad variety of data sources and across countries, making international comparative analyses possible.

摘要

北欧流域提供了多种生态系统服务,从可收获的商品到缓解气候变化和娱乐机会。供应的生态系统服务的流动取决于广泛的因素,包括气候、水文学、土地管理和人口密度。本研究的目的是:1)量化北欧流域消耗的生态系统服务的总经济价值(TEV),2)使用社会地理和自然因素作为多元线性回归的解释变量来解释生态系统服务价值的变化,3)确定哪些社会群体受益于这些生态系统服务。此外,我们根据最终生态系统服务(FES)的概念测试了我们框架的科学性。我们使用了一个空间明确、综合的生态系统服务量化框架,从丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的六个流域收集了最终生态系统服务提供的数据。我们的估计显示 TEV 和单独服务贡献的比例存在广泛变化,挪威 Orrevassdraget 流域的 TEV 最高,为 7199 欧元±4561 欧元/公顷/年(平均值±标准偏差),芬兰 Simojoki 流域的 TEV 最低,为 183 欧元±517 欧元/公顷/年。物质服务的价值取决于地理因素和土地管理实践,而非物质服务的价值则强烈取决于人口密度和水的可用性。在 GIS 分析中使用土地利用、森林生产力和人口密度的空间数据表明了生态系统服务供应的热点在哪里,以及特定的利益相关群体受益最多的地方。我们表明,我们的框架适用于广泛的数据源和国家,使国际比较分析成为可能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/805ad3574cde/pone.0252352.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/1ff2addb7363/pone.0252352.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/afe16ae5dd93/pone.0252352.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/600a569f107f/pone.0252352.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/a6c1f3b08036/pone.0252352.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/ce7ecdc8c6ad/pone.0252352.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/805ad3574cde/pone.0252352.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/1ff2addb7363/pone.0252352.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/afe16ae5dd93/pone.0252352.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/600a569f107f/pone.0252352.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/a6c1f3b08036/pone.0252352.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/ce7ecdc8c6ad/pone.0252352.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c89/8168860/805ad3574cde/pone.0252352.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Estimating societal benefits from Nordic catchments: An integrative approach using a final ecosystem services framework.估算北欧流域的社会效益:使用最终生态系统服务框架的综合方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 1;16(6):e0252352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252352. eCollection 2021.
2
Applying ecosystem services as a framework to analyze the effects of alternative bio-economy scenarios in Nordic catchments.应用生态系统服务作为框架,分析北欧流域中替代生物经济情景的影响。
Ambio. 2020 Nov;49(11):1784-1796. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01348-2. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
3
Lung cancer registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden: a comparison and proposal for harmonization.丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典的肺癌登记处:比较和协调建议。
Acta Oncol. 2023 Jan;62(1):1-7. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2023.2172687. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
4
Regulating and Cultural Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Infrastructure in the Nordic Countries: A Systematic Review.北欧国家城市绿色基础设施的调节和文化生态系统服务:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 29;18(3):1219. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031219.
5
Investing in sustainable catchments.投资可持续集水区。
Sci Total Environ. 2004 May 25;324(1-3):1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.019.
6
Fatal poisoning in drug addicts in the Nordic countries in 2017.2017 年北欧国家吸毒者的致命中毒事件。
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Aug;313:110343. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110343. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer diagnosis based on pathology notifications: A comparison across the Nordic countries during 2020.基于病理通知的 COVID-19 大流行对癌症诊断的影响:2020 年北欧国家的比较。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Aug 1;151(3):381-395. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34029. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
8
Different contraceptive practices: use of contraceptives in Finland and other Nordic countries in the 1970s and 1980s.不同的避孕方式:20世纪70年代和80年代芬兰及其他北欧国家的避孕药具使用情况
Scand J Soc Med. 1991 Mar;19(1):32-8. doi: 10.1177/140349489101900106.
9
Safeguarding the provision of ecosystem services in catchment systems.保护集水区系统中生态系统服务的提供。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2013 Apr;9(2):252-9. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1386. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
10
Alcohol-attributed disease burden in four Nordic countries: a comparison using the Global Burden of Disease, Injuries and Risk Factors 2013 study.四个北欧国家的酒精所致疾病负担:基于《2013年全球疾病、伤害及风险因素负担研究》的比较
Addiction. 2016 Oct;111(10):1806-13. doi: 10.1111/add.13430. Epub 2016 Jun 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Applying ecosystem services as a framework to analyze the effects of alternative bio-economy scenarios in Nordic catchments.应用生态系统服务作为框架,分析北欧流域中替代生物经济情景的影响。
Ambio. 2020 Nov;49(11):1784-1796. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01348-2. Epub 2020 Jun 27.
2
Assessing nature's contributions to people.评估自然对人类的贡献。
Science. 2018 Jan 19;359(6373):270-272. doi: 10.1126/science.aap8826.
3
Ecosystem services classification: A systems ecology perspective of the cascade framework.生态系统服务分类:基于级联框架的系统生态学视角
Ecol Indic. 2017 Mar;74:392-402. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.030.
4
Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape.绘制生态系统服务束揭示了瑞典景观中不同类型的多功能性。
Ambio. 2015 Jan;44 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S89-101. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
5
Linking water quality and well-being for improved assessment and valuation of ecosystem services.将水质与福祉联系起来,以改进生态系统服务的评估和估值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 6;109(45):18619-24. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1215991109. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
6
The value of urban open space: meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results.城市开放空间的价值:条件价值评估和享乐定价结果的荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2763-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019. Epub 2011 Jul 16.
7
Global consequences of land use.土地利用的全球影响。
Science. 2005 Jul 22;309(5734):570-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1111772.