Quiñones Ileana, Amoruso Lucia, Pomposo Gastelu Iñigo Cristobal, Gil-Robles Santiago, Carreiras Manuel
Neurobiology of Language Group, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language (BCBL), 20009 Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain.
IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, 48009 Bilbao, Spain.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 25;13(11):2593. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112593.
Recent evidence suggests that the presence of brain tumors (e.g., low-grade gliomas) triggers language reorganization. Neuroplasticity mechanisms called into play can transfer linguistic functions from damaged to healthy areas unaffected by the tumor. This phenomenon has been reported in monolingual patients, but much less is known about the neuroplasticity of language in the bilingual brain. A central question is whether processing a first or second language involves the same or different cortical territories and whether damage results in diverse recovery patterns depending on the language involved. This question becomes critical for preserving language areas in bilingual brain-tumor patients to prevent involuntary pathological symptoms following resection. While most studies have focused on intraoperative mapping, here, we go further, reporting clinical cases for five bilingual patients tested before and after tumor resection, using a novel multimethod approach merging neuroimaging information from fMRI and MEG to map the longitudinal reshaping of the language system. Here, we present four main findings. First, all patients preserved linguistic function in both languages after surgery, suggesting that the surgical intervention with intraoperative language mapping was successful in preserving cortical and subcortical structures necessary for brain plasticity at the functional level. Second, we found reorganization of the language network after tumor resection in both languages, mainly reflected by a shift of activity to right hemisphere nodes and the recruitment of ipsilesional left nodes. Third, we found that this reorganization varied according to the language involved, indicating that L1 and L2 follow different reshaping patterns after surgery. Fourth, oscillatory longitudinal effects were correlated with BOLD laterality changes in superior parietal and middle frontal areas. These findings may reflect that neuroplasticity impacts on the compensatory involvement of executive control regions, supporting the allocation of cognitive resources as a consequence of increased attentional demands. Furthermore, these results hint at the complementary role of this neuroimaging approach in language mapping, with fMRI offering excellent spatial localization and MEG providing optimal spectrotemporal resolution.
最近的证据表明,脑肿瘤(如低级别胶质瘤)的存在会引发语言重组。被激活的神经可塑性机制可将语言功能从受损区域转移至未受肿瘤影响的健康区域。这种现象在单语患者中已有报道,但对于双语大脑中语言的神经可塑性却知之甚少。一个核心问题是,处理第一语言或第二语言是否涉及相同或不同的皮质区域,以及损伤是否会根据所涉及的语言导致不同的恢复模式。这个问题对于保留双语脑肿瘤患者的语言区域以防止切除术后出现非自愿性病理症状至关重要。虽然大多数研究都集中在术中图谱绘制上,但在此我们更进一步,报告了五名双语患者在肿瘤切除前后接受测试的临床病例,采用了一种新颖的多方法,将功能磁共振成像(fMRI)和脑磁图(MEG)的神经影像信息合并,以绘制语言系统的纵向重塑。在此,我们呈现四个主要发现。第一,所有患者术后两种语言的语言功能均得以保留,这表明术中语言图谱绘制的手术干预在功能层面成功保留了大脑可塑性所需的皮质和皮质下结构。第二,我们发现肿瘤切除后两种语言的语言网络均发生了重组,主要表现为活动向右侧半球节点转移以及同侧左侧节点的募集。第三,我们发现这种重组因所涉及的语言而异,表明第一语言和第二语言在术后遵循不同的重塑模式。第四,振荡纵向效应与顶叶上部和额中区域的血氧水平依赖(BOLD)偏侧性变化相关。这些发现可能反映出神经可塑性对执行控制区域的代偿性参与产生影响,支持了由于注意力需求增加而导致的认知资源分配。此外,这些结果暗示了这种神经影像方法在语言图谱绘制中的互补作用,功能磁共振成像提供了出色的空间定位,而脑磁图提供了最佳的频谱时间分辨率。