Suppr超能文献

富血小板血浆联合微针与单纯微针治疗痤疮后瘢痕疗效的半脸对照研究

Split-face Comparative Study of Efficacy of Platelet-rich Plasma Combined with Microneedling versus Microneedling alone in Treatment of Post-acne Scars.

作者信息

Nandini A S, Sankey Sana M, Sowmya C S, Sharath Kumar B C

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy, Kempegowda Institute of Medical Sciences Hospital and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):26-31. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_160_18.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Skin conditions contribute substantial burden toward global morbidity and mortality. Acne vulgaris, with its rising prevalence, has become a cause of concern among researchers as well as dermatologists due to scarring.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of microneedling alone versus microneedling combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in post-acne scars using a split-face method.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with atrophic post-acne facial scars were offered four sittings of treatment monthly once. As a standard protocol, the right side of the face was subjected to microneedling with PRP (Group A) and the left side of the face with microneedling alone (Group B). Objective evaluation of improvement was performed by the physician recording the acne scar assessment score at baseline and thereafter at every visit using Goodman and Baron scale. Alongside patients also graded the improvement in acne scars at the end of the study.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

The collected information was entered in MS Excel (Bellevue, WA, USA) and analyzed using appropriate statistical methods with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The significance of the outcomes of the study was assessed by calculating the value and the value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients was 25 years. Thirteen (43%) patients in Group A had an excellent response as compared to 6 (20%) patients in Group B according to physician assessment. Patient's satisfaction was more in Group A as compared to Group B as 11 (36%) patients had more than 75% improvement in Group A as compared to 1 (3%) patient in Group B.

CONCLUSION

The study showed a decrease in scar severity grade in all the patients enrolled for treatment. However, the combined use of microneedling and PRP was found to be more effective than a single method used for treatment of acne scars.

摘要

背景

皮肤疾病给全球发病率和死亡率带来了沉重负担。寻常痤疮的患病率不断上升,由于会形成瘢痕,已成为研究人员和皮肤科医生关注的一个问题。

目的

本研究的目的是采用半脸法比较单独微针治疗与微针联合富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗痤疮后瘢痕的疗效。

材料与方法

30例面部萎缩性痤疮后瘢痕患者每月接受4次治疗。作为标准方案,面部右侧采用微针联合PRP治疗(A组),面部左侧仅采用微针治疗(B组)。医生通过使用古德曼和巴伦量表在基线时以及此后每次就诊时记录痤疮瘢痕评估分数来进行客观的改善评估。同时,患者在研究结束时也对面部痤疮瘢痕的改善情况进行评分。

所用统计分析方法

收集到的信息录入微软Excel(美国华盛顿州贝尔维尤),并使用社会科学统计软件包(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)的适当统计方法进行分析。通过计算P值评估研究结果的显著性,P<0.05被认为具有统计学显著性。

结果

患者的平均年龄为25岁。根据医生评估,A组有13例(43%)患者反应极佳,而B组有6例(20%)患者反应极佳。A组患者的满意度高于B组,A组有11例(36%)患者改善超过75%,而B组只有1例(3%)患者改善超过75%。

结论

该研究表明,所有纳入治疗的患者瘢痕严重程度等级均有所降低。然而,研究发现,微针联合PRP治疗比单一方法治疗痤疮瘢痕更有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/648b/8149994/5a461754fea9/JCAS-14-26-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验