Gupta Meghna, Barman Krishna Deb, Sarkar Rashmi
Department of Dermatology, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, India.
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2021 Jan-Mar;14(1):64-71. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_190_20.
There are several modalities of treating acne scars. The combination of microneedling and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a synergistic approach to treat acne scars.
The aim was to compare the efficacy of microneedling alone versus microneedling with PRP in acne scars.
This was a split face study conducted on 36 patients with acne scars who underwent four sessions of microneedling with PRP on right side and microneedling alone on left side at monthly interval. The total scars with subtypes and Ecchelle D'Evaluation Cliniques des Cicatrices D'Acne (ECCA) score were assessed at baseline and second, fourth, and sixth visits. Visual analog score (VAS) was evaluated by both physicians and patients.
The statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for Social Sciences. Paired- test and Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to compare the results.
Mean age was 23.7±3.2 years with 17 male and 19 female patients. The mean total scars on right and left sides declined from 42.14±21.15 to 25.08±14.14 and 43.28+23.08 to 27.17±15.68, respectively, with insignificant differences (-value = 0.094). ECCA score on right and left sides declined from 88.31±32.78 to 62.92±23.68 and 89.58±32.43 to 66.25±23.89, respectively (-value = 0.058). VAS evaluated by patient and physician showed maximum improvement at second and third visits, respectively.
This study showed no added advantage of topical application of PRP over microneedling in acne scars.
治疗痤疮疤痕有多种方式。微针疗法与富血小板血浆(PRP)联合使用是一种治疗痤疮疤痕的协同方法。
比较单独使用微针疗法与微针疗法联合PRP治疗痤疮疤痕的疗效。
这是一项针对36例痤疮疤痕患者的半脸研究,患者右侧接受4次微针疗法联合PRP治疗,左侧单独接受微针疗法,每月进行一次。在基线以及第二次、第四次和第六次就诊时评估疤痕总数及亚型和痤疮疤痕临床评估埃chelle评分(ECCA)。医生和患者均对视觉模拟评分(VAS)进行评估。
使用社会科学统计软件包进行统计分析。采用配对检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较结果。
平均年龄为23.7±3.2岁,男性17例,女性19例。右侧和左侧的平均疤痕总数分别从42.14±21.15降至25.08±14.14以及从43.28 + 23.08降至27.17±15.68,差异无统计学意义(P值 = 0.094)。右侧和左侧的ECCA评分分别从88.31±32.78降至62.92±23.68以及从89.58±32.43降至66.25±23.89(P值 = 0.058)。患者和医生评估的VAS分别在第二次和第三次就诊时显示出最大改善。
本研究表明,在痤疮疤痕治疗中,局部应用PRP相较于微针疗法并无额外优势。