Department for Economy and Health, Danube University Krems, Krems, Austria.
at-MO-sphere Immobilienverwaltung e.U, Klagenfurt/Wörthersee, Austria.
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021 Jun 2;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print):229-47. doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2020-0034.
This study aims to examine the effects of ethical leadership on job satisfaction, affective commitment and burnout of health care employees, considering frustration tolerance and emotional stability as moderating variables.
DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A questionnaire was used to survey health care professionals working in private and public Austrian health-care organizations (hospitals, nursing homes, rehabilitation centers and sanatoriums). The questionnaire consisted of items from well-established scales. The collected data ( = 458) was analyzed using correlation and regression analyzes.
Findings indicated that ethical leadership is significantly positively related to job satisfaction ( = 0.485, < 0.01) and affective commitment ( = 0.461, < 0.01) and is significantly negatively related to burnout ( = -0.347, < 0.01). The results also suggest that frustration tolerance (ß = 0.101, < 0.1) and emotional stability (ß = 0.093, < 0.1) moderate the relationship between ethical leadership and burnout. Furthermore, a moderation effect of emotional stability in the ethical leadership and affective commitment relation was indicated. No moderation effect was found for frustration tolerance or emotional stability for the relationship between ethical leadership and job satisfaction.
Ethical leadership emphasizes the socio-emotional dimension in a leader-employee relationship, which can easily be neglected in times of staff cuts and work overload. Leadership training should include the development of skills in how to visibly act as a moral person, as well as how to set clear ethical standards and communicate them to employees.
ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study adds value to the limited evidence on the beneficial role of ethical leadership in health care settings. In addition, frustration tolerance and emotional stability have not before been investigated as moderators.
本研究旨在考察伦理领导力对医疗保健员工工作满意度、情感承诺和倦怠的影响,同时将挫折容忍度和情绪稳定性作为调节变量。
设计/方法/途径:采用问卷对奥地利私立和公立医疗保健组织(医院、疗养院、康复中心和疗养院)的医疗保健专业人员进行调查。问卷由成熟量表中的项目组成。收集的数据(n=458)使用相关和回归分析进行分析。
研究结果表明,伦理领导力与工作满意度(r=0.485,p<0.01)和情感承诺(r=0.461,p<0.01)呈显著正相关,与倦怠呈显著负相关(r=-0.347,p<0.01)。结果还表明,挫折容忍度(β=0.101,p<0.1)和情绪稳定性(β=0.093,p<0.1)调节伦理领导力与倦怠之间的关系。此外,还表明情绪稳定性在伦理领导力与情感承诺关系中存在调节作用。然而,在伦理领导力与工作满意度之间的关系中,挫折容忍度或情绪稳定性没有表现出调节作用。
伦理领导力强调领导者与员工关系中的社会情感维度,而在裁员和工作超负荷时期,这一维度很容易被忽视。领导力培训应包括发展如何作为一个道德的人表现出来的技能,以及如何制定明确的道德标准并将其传达给员工。
原创性/价值:本研究为伦理领导力在医疗保健环境中的有益作用提供了有限的证据,增加了价值。此外,挫折容忍度和情绪稳定性以前没有被作为调节变量进行研究。