• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于美国禁止薄荷醇香烟和雪茄的影响的专家意见征集

An Expert Elicitation on the Effects of a Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Cigars in the United States.

作者信息

Levy David T, Cadham Christopher J, Sanchez-Romero Luz Maria, Knoll Marie, Travis Nargiz, Yuan Zhe, Li Yameng, Mistry Ritesh, Douglas Clifford E, Tam Jamie, Sertkaya Aylin, Warner Kenneth E, Meza Rafael

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Oct 7;23(11):1911-1920. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab121.

DOI:10.1093/ntr/ntab121
PMID:34097061
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8496475/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The US Food and Drug Administration announced its intention to ban menthol in cigarettes. However, information is needed on how a federal ban would affect population health.

AIMS AND METHODS

We conducted an expert elicitation to gauge the impact of a menthol cigarette and cigar ban in the United States. We developed and pilot tested a questionnaire that focused on tobacco use transitions of current smokers (age 18-24 menthol, age 35-54 menthol, and age 35-54 nonmenthol) and potential menthol smokers (age 12-24). Using a structured expert elicitation, we estimated mean net transitions under a ban from cigarette use to combustible tobacco product, smokeless tobacco, novel nicotine delivery product (NNDPs, such as e-cigarettes) use, or no tobacco use.

RESULTS

Eleven experts provided responses. Of those ages 12-24 who would have initiated menthol cigarette use in the absence of a ban, the experts estimated that 41% would still initiate combustible products under a ban, while 18% would initiate with NNDPs and 39% would not initiate regular tobacco use. Combustible use by menthol smokers ages 35-54 was expected to decline by 20% postban relative to preban rates, half switching to NNDPs and half quitting all tobacco use. Menthol smokers ages 18-24 were expected to reduce combustible use by 30%, with 16% switching to NNDPs. Greater reductions in combustible use were estimated for African Americans across the three age groups. Negligible impacts were expected for current adult nonmenthol smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

According to expert opinion, a menthol ban is expected to substantially reduce smoking initiation and combustible tobacco product use among current menthol smokers.

IMPLICATIONS

The US Food and Drug Administration recently announced its intention to ban menthol in cigarettes, but information on the potential impact on smoking and other nicotine product use is limited. We conducted an expert elicitation to gauge the impact of a menthol cigarette and cigar ban in the United States. A panel of experts estimated that menthol smokers ages 35-54 would reduce combustible tobacco use by 20%, with half switching to e-cigarettes and half quitting all nicotine use. Larger reductions were expected at younger ages, and menthol smoking initiation was reduced by 59% with 18% instead using e-cigarettes. African Americans were expected to have greater reductions in combustible tobacco use than the rest of the population.

摘要

引言

美国食品药品监督管理局宣布有意禁止香烟中的薄荷醇。然而,关于联邦禁令将如何影响公众健康的信息尚需了解。

目的与方法

我们进行了一次专家意见征集,以评估美国禁止薄荷醇香烟和雪茄的影响。我们制定并进行了预测试一份问卷,该问卷聚焦于当前吸烟者(18 - 24岁吸薄荷醇香烟者、35 - 54岁吸薄荷醇香烟者以及35 - 54岁不吸薄荷醇香烟者)和潜在薄荷醇吸烟者(12 - 24岁)的烟草使用转变情况。通过结构化的专家意见征集,我们估计了在禁令下从使用香烟转变为使用可燃烟草制品、无烟烟草、新型尼古丁递送产品(如电子烟等新型尼古丁递送产品)或不再使用烟草的平均净转变情况。

结果

11位专家提供了回复。在那些若没有禁令就会开始吸薄荷醇香烟的12 - 24岁人群中,专家估计在禁令下41%的人仍会开始使用可燃产品,18%的人会开始使用新型尼古丁递送产品,39%的人不会开始常规烟草使用。预计35 - 54岁的薄荷醇吸烟者在禁令实施后相对于禁令实施前,可燃烟草的使用量将下降20%,其中一半转向新型尼古丁递送产品,一半戒掉所有烟草使用。预计18 - 24岁的薄荷醇吸烟者可燃烟草使用量将减少30%,其中16%转向新型尼古丁递送产品。在这三个年龄组中,预计非裔美国人可燃烟草使用量的减少幅度更大。预计当前成年非薄荷醇吸烟者受到的影响可忽略不计。

结论

根据专家意见,预计薄荷醇禁令将大幅减少当前薄荷醇吸烟者的吸烟起始率和可燃烟草制品的使用。

启示

美国食品药品监督管理局最近宣布有意禁止香烟中的薄荷醇,但关于其对吸烟及其他尼古丁产品使用的潜在影响的信息有限。我们进行了一次专家意见征集,以评估美国禁止薄荷醇香烟和雪茄的影响。一组专家估计,35 - 54岁的薄荷醇吸烟者可燃烟草使用量将减少20%,其中一半转向电子烟,一半戒掉所有尼古丁使用。预计在较年轻年龄段减少幅度更大,吸薄荷醇香烟的起始率降低59%,其中18%转而使用电子烟。预计非裔美国人可燃烟草使用量的减少幅度将大于其他人群。

相似文献

1
An Expert Elicitation on the Effects of a Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Cigars in the United States.关于美国禁止薄荷醇香烟和雪茄的影响的专家意见征集
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Oct 7;23(11):1911-1920. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab121.
2
Public health impact of a US ban on menthol in cigarettes and cigars: a simulation study.美国禁止薄荷醇在香烟和雪茄中的使用对公共卫生的影响:一项模拟研究。
Tob Control. 2023 Apr;32(e1):e37-e44. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056604. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
Responses to Real-World and Hypothetical Menthol Flavor Bans Among US Young Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes.回应现实世界和假设的薄荷醇口味禁令对美国吸薄荷醇香烟的年轻人的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 22;26(6):785-789. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad259.
4
Should menthol e-cigarettes be banned? Reaction of adult smokers and users of e-cigarettes to hypothetical bans.含薄荷醇电子烟应被禁止吗?成年吸烟者和电子烟使用者对假设禁令的反应。
Tob Control. 2024 Mar 19;33(e1):e125-e127. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057439.
5
Effect on Tobacco Use and Subjective Measures of Including E-cigarettes in a Simulated Ban of Menthol in Combustible Cigarettes.含薄荷醇香烟模拟禁令对吸烟行为和主观感受的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Aug 6;24(9):1448-1457. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac107.
6
Behavioural intentions in response to a potential menthol cigarette sales ban: a survey examining smokers in Washington, DC public housing.对潜在薄荷醇香烟销售禁令的行为意向:一项在华盛顿特区公共住房中检查吸烟者的调查。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jul 13;12(7):e059821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059821.
7
Reactions to hypothetical flavor bans among current users of flavored e-cigarettes.当前使用调味电子烟人群对假设性口味禁令的反应。
Transl Behav Med. 2023 Aug 11;13(8):533-538. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac109.
8
An Estimation of the Prevalence of Smoking and e-Cigarette Use among U.S. Adults If Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars Are Banned.如果薄荷香烟和调味雪茄被禁止,估计美国成年人的吸烟和电子烟使用情况。
Subst Use Misuse. 2024;59(9):1394-1404. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2352616. Epub 2024 May 9.
9
How Smokers of Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored Cigars Might Respond to FDA's Proposed Bans.薄荷烟和调味雪茄烟吸烟者对 FDA 拟议禁令的可能反应。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 17;24(10):1645-1653. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac078.
10
Community Voices: A Qualitative Study Exploring Perceptions of Menthol Cigarette Sales Restrictions in Los Angeles County Among Black Adults Who Smoke Menthol Cigarettes.社区声音:一项定性研究,探讨洛杉矶县吸薄荷烟的黑人成年人对薄荷烟销售限制的看法。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 31;26(Supplement_2):S82-S88. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad141.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco use behaviors in response to menthol restriction: A scoping review.应对薄荷醇限制的烟草使用行为:一项范围综述。
Tob Induc Dis. 2025 Feb 28;23. doi: 10.18332/tid/200694. eCollection 2025.
2
The Public Health Impact of a Ban on Flavored Cigars: A Decision-Theoretic Policy Framework.禁止调味雪茄对公共卫生的影响:一个决策理论政策框架。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Jan 22;27(2):333-341. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae173.
3
Impact of Smoking Cessation Motivations and Barriers on Quit Intentions Following a Hypothetical Flavor Ban Among African American/Black Individuals Who Use Menthol Cigarettes: A Mixed-Methods Study.假设薄荷香烟口味禁令后,非裔美国人/黑人使用薄荷香烟者戒烟动机和障碍对戒烟意愿的影响:一项混合方法研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 May 31;26(Supplement_2):S121-S132. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad062.
4
What Is (Un)Flavored? A Scoping Review of the Conceptualization of Flavored Cigarillos.什么是(无)调味?调味小雪茄概念化的范围综述。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Aug 22;26(9):1120-1131. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae039.
5
The Impact of Menthol Cigarette Bans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.薄荷醇香烟禁令的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Jan 22;27(2):179-191. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae011.
6
A Patchy Prohibition: Product and Flavor Substitution After the Food and Drug Administration's Prioritized Enforcement Policy on Flavored E-cigarettes.局部禁令:美国食品药品监督管理局对调味电子烟实施优先执法政策后的产品与口味替代
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Apr 22;26(5):527-535. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad212.
7
A Longitudinal Study of Perceptions of the Massachusetts Menthol Ban and Its Impact on Smoking Behaviors among Marginalized Individuals.一项关于马萨诸塞州薄荷醇禁令的看法及其对边缘化个体吸烟行为影响的纵向研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 11;20(10):5790. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105790.
8
Responses of African American Individuals Who Use Menthol Cigarettes to Potential Flavored Tobacco Bans.使用薄荷醇卷烟的非裔美国人对潜在调味烟草禁令的反应。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Jun;64(6):898-901. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
9
The actual and anticipated effects of restrictions on flavoured electronic nicotine delivery systems: a scoping review.限制调味电子烟对实际和预期影响的研究综述。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Nov 19;22(1):2128. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14440-x.
10
Impact of the European Union's menthol cigarette ban on smoking cessation outcomes: longitudinal findings from the 2020-2021 ITC Netherlands Surveys.欧盟薄荷醇卷烟禁令对戒烟效果的影响:来自 2020-2021 年 ITC 荷兰调查的纵向研究结果。
Tob Control. 2024 Apr 19;33(3):302-309. doi: 10.1136/tc-2022-057428.

本文引用的文献

1
Tobacco Product Use Among Middle and High School Students - United States, 2020.《2020 年美国中学生使用烟草制品情况》
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Dec 18;69(50):1881-1888. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6950a1.
2
Trends in Tobacco Use Among Adolescents by Grade, Sex, and Race, 1991-2019.1991 年至 2019 年,不同年级、性别和种族青少年的烟草使用趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2027465. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.27465.
3
The actual and anticipated effects of a menthol cigarette ban: a scoping review.含薄荷醇香烟禁令的实际和预期影响:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):1055. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09055-z.
4
Weighting and aggregating expert ecological judgments.权衡和综合专家生态判断。
Ecol Appl. 2020 Jun;30(4):e02075. doi: 10.1002/eap.2075. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
Tobacco Product Use and Associated Factors Among Middle and High School Students - 
United States, 2019.中学生烟草制品使用及相关因素分析- 
美国,2019 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2019 Nov 6;68(12):1-22. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6812a1.
6
Sociodemographic Correlates of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) Use in the United States, 2016-2017.美国 2016-2017 年电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)使用的社会人口学相关性。
Am J Public Health. 2019 Sep;109(9):1224-1232. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305158. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
The Role of Expert Judgment in Statistical Inference and Evidence-Based Decision-Making.专家判断在统计推断和循证决策中的作用。
Am Stat. 2019 Mar 20;73(1):56-68. doi: 10.1080/00031305.2018.1529623. eCollection 2019.
8
Why an FDA Ban on Menthol Is Likely to Survive a Tobacco Industry Lawsuit.为何美国食品药品监督管理局对薄荷醇香烟的禁令可能在烟草行业诉讼中得以维持。
Public Health Rep. 2019 May/Jun;134(3):300-306. doi: 10.1177/0033354919841011. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
9
Evaluating a Real World Ban on Menthol Cigarettes: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis of Sales.评估薄荷香烟的真实世界禁令:销售的中断时间序列分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Apr 17;22(4):576-579. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntz041.
10
Examining the relationship of vaping to smoking initiation among US youth and young adults: a reality check.考察美国青少年和年轻成年人中 vaping 与吸烟起始的关系:现实情况检查。
Tob Control. 2019 Nov;28(6):629-635. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054446. Epub 2018 Nov 20.