Bredicean Cristina, Tamasan Simona Claudia, Lungeanu Diana, Giurgi-Oncu Catalina, Stoica Ileana-Pepita, Panfil Anca-Livia, Vasilian Claudia, Secosan Ica, Ursoniu Sorin, Patrascu Raul
NEUROPSY-COG Center for Cognitive Research in Neuropsychiatric Pathology, Department of Neuroscience, "Victor Babes" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.
Psychiatry Compartment, "Dr. Victor Popescu" Emergency Military Clinical Hospital, Timisoara, Romania.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 31;14:2231-2244. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S300578. eCollection 2021.
The year 2020 was marked by the COVID-19 pandemic, massively disruptive at the general population level and for healthcare systems. We aimed to evaluate the psychological distress associated with work-related experiences among medical professionals and supporting staff during the pandemic outbreak.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted between April and May 2020, employing a self-administered on-line questionnaire that included the collection of socio-demographic and professional status information, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), Maslach Burnout Inventory - General Survey, Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, and a subscale of the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) for empathy. A total of 364 professionals of the county-coordinated area responded. Descriptive statistics summarized the findings and a mediation model was analyzed, applying the causal step strategy. The specific direct and causal mediation effects were estimated with the bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap sampling method.
Anxiety, burnout, stress, resilience, and empathy proved to be significantly associated with both the professional category (ie, consultant, specialty doctor, trainee doctor, senior nurse, trainee nurse or other) and the perceived professional support (the nonparametric multivariate permutation test resulted in p=0.048 and p<0.001, respectively). When controlling for the marital and professional status, the female gender had an OR=2.26, 95% CI (1.21; 4.22) toward a high level of empathy compared to males. The causal mediation effect of the perceived lack of professional support on empathy through burnout-depersonalization was highly significant (p<0.001) with an average of 0.0599, 95% CI (0.0238; 0.10), while the direct effect was non-significant (p=0.536) with an average of 0.0295, 95% CI (-0.0774; 0.15).
We highlighted the impact of the lack of professional support on healthcare workers' empathy through burnout-depersonalization in a context of a high workload, time pressure, job stress beyond previous training, and inherently limited organizational support, which are potentially modifiable factors in the mid-term.
2020年以新冠疫情为标志,这场疫情在普通人群层面以及医疗系统中造成了巨大破坏。我们旨在评估疫情爆发期间医疗专业人员和辅助人员与工作相关经历相关的心理困扰。
于2020年4月至5月进行了一项横断面调查,采用自行填写的在线问卷,问卷内容包括收集社会人口统计学和职业状况信息、汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表、九项患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)、马氏职业倦怠量表 - 一般调查、康纳 - 戴维森韧性量表以及国际个性项目池(IPIP)中的共情分量表。共有364名来自县协调地区的专业人员做出了回应。描述性统计总结了研究结果,并采用因果步骤策略分析了中介模型。使用偏差校正和加速自抽样方法估计了具体的直接和因果中介效应。
焦虑、职业倦怠、压力、韧性和共情均被证明与专业类别(即顾问、专科医生、实习医生、高级护士、实习护士或其他)以及感知到的专业支持显著相关(非参数多变量置换检验结果分别为p = 0.048和p < 0.001)。在控制婚姻和职业状况后,与男性相比,女性出现高水平共情的比值比(OR)为2.26,95%置信区间(1.21;4.22)。感知到的专业支持缺失通过职业倦怠 - 去人格化对共情产生的因果中介效应高度显著(p < 0.001),平均值为0.0599,95%置信区间(0.0238;0.10),而直接效应不显著(p = 0.536),平均值为0.0295,95%置信区间(-0.0774;0.15)。
我们强调了在工作量大、时间压力大、超出以往培训的工作压力以及内在组织支持有限的背景下,专业支持缺失通过职业倦怠 - 去人格化对医护人员共情产生的影响,这些在中期可能是可改变的因素。