Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2021;22(6):419-424. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2021.1934829. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
Over 10,000 people die in alcohol-impaired-driving traffic crashes every year in the U.S. Approximately half of alcohol-impaired drivers report their last drink was at a bar or restaurant, and most bars and restaurants serve alcohol to patrons who are already intoxicated, known as overservice. Law enforcement agencies use various strategies to address alcohol-impaired driving and overservice but research on the effectiveness of these strategies is limited. Our objective was to assess whether law enforcement efforts focusing on alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol overservice were associated with alcohol-impaired-driving fatal traffic crashes. We conducted a survey of police and sheriff agencies in 1,082 communities across the U.S. in 2010 regarding their alcohol enforcement practices. We assessed whether the agency conducted: (1) alcohol overservice enforcement and (2) alcohol-impaired driving enforcement (sobriety checkpoints, saturation patrols, open container, overall alcohol-impaired driving enforcement). From the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (2009-2013), we obtained counts of alcohol-impaired-driving fatal traffic crashes (at least one driver had blood alcohol content ≥ 0.08) within the agency's jurisdiction boundary and within a 10-mile buffer. Using multi-level regression, we assessed whether each enforcement type was associated with alcohol-impaired-driving fatal crashes (per 100,000 population). For both the jurisdiction boundary and 10-mile buffer, we ran stratified models based on community/agency type: (1) small town/rural police; (2) urban/suburban police and (3) sheriffs. In jurisdiction boundary models, urban/suburban communities where police conducted overservice enforcement (compared to those that did not) had fewer alcohol-impaired-driving fatal crashes (5.0 vs. 6.6; p = 0.01). For the 10-mile buffer, small town/rural communities where police agencies conducted overservice enforcement (compared to those that did not) had fewer alcohol-impaired-driving fatal crashes (16.9 vs. 21.2; p = 0.01); we found similar results for small town/rural communities where police used saturation patrols (18.7 vs. 22.1; p = 0.05) and had overall high alcohol-impaired driving enforcement (18.7 vs. 22.1; p = 0.05). The direction and the size of the effects for other types of enforcement and agencies were similar, but not statistically significant. Alcohol enforcement strategies among police agencies in small town/rural communities may be particularly effective in reducing alcohol-impaired fatal traffic crashes. Results varied by enforcement, agency and community type.
每年,美国有超过 10000 人死于与酒后驾车有关的交通事故。大约一半的酒后驾车司机报告称,他们的最后一次饮酒是在酒吧或餐馆,而且大多数酒吧和餐馆都向已经醉酒的顾客提供酒水,这被称为过度服务。执法机构采用各种策略来解决酒后驾车和过度服务问题,但这些策略的有效性研究有限。我们的目的是评估专注于酒后驾车和过度服务的执法工作是否与酒后驾车致命交通事故有关。我们对 2010 年美国 1082 个社区的警察和治安官机构进行了一项关于其酒精执法做法的调查。我们评估了该机构是否进行了以下两项执法工作:(1) 过度服务执法和 (2) 酒后驾车执法( sobriety checkpoints,saturation patrols,open container,overall alcohol-impaired driving enforcement)。从 2009 年至 2013 年的致命事故分析报告系统中,我们获得了该机构管辖范围内和 10 英里缓冲区范围内的每起与酒精有关的酒后驾车致命交通事故的次数(至少有一名司机的血液酒精含量≥0.08)。使用多水平回归,我们评估了每种执法类型是否与酒后驾车致命事故有关(每 10 万人中有多少人)。对于管辖边界和 10 英里缓冲区,我们根据社区/机构类型进行了分层模型分析:(1) 小镇/农村警察;(2) 城市/郊区警察和 (3) 治安官。在管辖边界模型中,与未进行过度服务执法的城市/郊区社区相比,进行过度服务执法的城市/郊区社区的酒后驾车致命事故更少(5.0 比 6.6;p=0.01)。对于 10 英里缓冲区,与未进行过度服务执法的社区相比,进行过度服务执法的小镇/农村社区的酒后驾车致命事故更少(16.9 比 21.2;p=0.01);我们还发现,警察机构进行过饱和巡逻(18.7 比 22.1;p=0.05)和整体高度酒后驾车执法(18.7 比 22.1;p=0.05)的小镇/农村社区也有类似的结果。其他类型的执法和机构的执法效果方向和规模相似,但没有统计学意义。小镇/农村社区警察机构的酒精执法策略可能特别有助于减少与酒精有关的致命交通事故。结果因执法、机构和社区类型而异。