Chouchene Farah, Masmoudi Fatma, Baaziz Ahlem, Maatouk Fethi, Ghedira Hichem
Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.
Laboratory of Biological Clinical and Dento-Facial Approach (ABCDF Laboratory LR12ES10), University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia.
Int J Dent. 2021 May 27;2021:5518599. doi: 10.1155/2021/5518599. eCollection 2021.
To compare the effectiveness of topical antibiotic mixtures used in noninstrumental endodontic treatment (NIET) of primary teeth.
Electronic databases including MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus database were searched. Randomized clinical trials evaluating the clinical and radiological outcomes of topical antibiotics used in NIET were selected. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the quality of the methodology of the included articles.
Five articles comparing the outcomes of four different drugs combination were included. Three studies conducted to evaluate the success rate of two combinations of antibacterial drugs consisting of ciprofloxacin-minocycline-metronidazole (3 Mix) in one group and ciprofloxacin-minocycline-ornidazole in the other group showed no statistically significant difference between both groups ( > 0.05). The ciprofloxacin-minocycline-ornidazole group showed better results compared with the 3 Mix group. One study conducted to compare the effectiveness of 3 Mix with ciprofloxacin-tinidazole-minocycline reported no significant difference between both groups, and one study that compared 3 Mix and ciprofloxacin-metronidazole-clindamycin mixture concluded that the overall success rates of both groups were 80.96% and 76.20%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference.
Based on the overall success rates, the ciprofloxacin-minocycline-ornidazole mixture was considered more effective than the 3 Mix which was more effective than the ciprofloxacin-tinidazole-minocycline and the ciprofloxacin-metronidazole-clindamycin groups. . Different antibiotic combinations, showing good clinical and radiographic success in treating necrotic primary teeth, can be used effectively in NIET and this technique can be considered effective for teeth with advanced root resorption and when conventional endodontic treatment is contraindicated.
比较局部用抗生素混合物在乳牙非器械性根管治疗(NIET)中的有效性。
检索了包括MEDLINE、Cochrane图书馆和Scopus数据库在内的电子数据库。选取评估NIET中局部用抗生素临床和影像学结果的随机临床试验。使用修订后的Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2.0)评估纳入文章的方法学质量。
纳入了5篇比较4种不同药物组合结果的文章。3项研究评估了两组抗菌药物组合的成功率,一组为环丙沙星-米诺环素-甲硝唑(3种混合药物),另一组为环丙沙星-米诺环素-奥硝唑,两组间无统计学显著差异(>0.05)。环丙沙星-米诺环素-奥硝唑组的结果优于3种混合药物组。1项比较3种混合药物与环丙沙星-替硝唑-米诺环素有效性的研究报告称两组间无显著差异,1项比较3种混合药物与环丙沙星-甲硝唑-克林霉素混合物的研究得出结论,两组的总体成功率分别为80.96%和76.20%,无统计学显著差异。
基于总体成功率,环丙沙星-米诺环素-奥硝唑混合物被认为比3种混合药物更有效,而3种混合药物又比环丙沙星-替硝唑-米诺环素组和环丙沙星-甲硝唑-克林霉素组更有效。不同的抗生素组合在治疗坏死乳牙方面显示出良好的临床和影像学成功率,可有效地用于NIET,并且该技术对于有严重牙根吸收以及传统根管治疗禁忌的牙齿可被认为是有效的。