Campieri M, Gionchetti P, Belluzzi A, Brignola C, Tabanelli G M, Miglioli M, Barbara L
Istituto di Clinica Medica e Gastroenterologia, Universitá di Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola, Italy.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1988 Aug;10(4):406-9. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198808000-00012.
Thirty-nine patients with documented active distal proctitis (less than 20 cm) received either 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) enemas (2 g in 100 ml) or suppositories 1 g b.i.d., in a controlled study. Twenty patients received enemas, while 19 patients received suppositories, for 30 days. No difference could be observed in terms of efficacy; however, it was the patients' opinion that treatment with suppositories was easier than that with enemas (p less than 0.01).
在一项对照研究中，39例确诊为活动性直肠炎（距肛门小于20厘米）的患者接受了5-氨基水杨酸（5-ASA）灌肠（100毫升中含2克）或栓剂（每枚1克，每日两次）治疗。20例患者接受灌肠治疗，19例患者接受栓剂治疗，疗程均为30天。在疗效方面未观察到差异；然而，患者认为使用栓剂治疗比灌肠治疗更容易（p<0.01）。
