• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼日利亚孕妇间歇性预防治疗疟疾普及率中社会经济不平等的分解:来自人口健康调查的证据。

Decomposition of socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in Nigeria: evidence from Demographic Health Survey.

机构信息

School of Business, and Centre for Health Research, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, 4350, Australia.

Department of Health Administration and Management, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria.

出版信息

Malar J. 2021 Jul 3;20(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03834-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12936-021-03834-8
PMID:34217299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8254225/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although malaria in pregnancy is preventable with the use of intermittent preventive treatment with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (IPTp-SP), it still causes maternal morbidity and mortality, in sub-Saharan Africa and Nigeria in particular. Socioeconomic inequality leads to limited uptake of IPTp-SP by pregnant women and is, therefore, a public health challenge in Nigeria. This study aimed to measure and identify factors explaining socioeconomic inequality in the uptake of IPTp-SP in Nigeria.

METHODS

The study re-analysed dataset of 12,294 women aged 15-49 years from 2018 Nigeria Demographic Health Survey (DHS). The normalized concentration index (C) and concentration curve were used to quantify and graphically present socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of IPTp-SP among pregnant women in Nigeria. The C was decomposed to identify key factors contributing to the observed socioeconomic inequality in the uptake of adequate (≥ 3) IPTp-SP.

RESULTS

The study showed a higher concentration of the adequate uptake of IPTp-SP among socioeconomically advantaged women (C = 0.062; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.048 to 0.076) in Nigeria. There is a pro-rich inequality in the uptake of IPTp-SP in urban areas (C = 0.283; 95%CI 0.279 to 0.288). In contrast, a pro-poor inequality in the uptake of IPTp-SP was observed in rural areas (C = - 0.238; 95%CI - 0.242 to - 0.235). The result of the decomposition analysis indicated that geographic zone of residence and antenatal visits were the two main drivers for the concentration of the uptake of IPTp-SP among wealthier pregnant women in Nigeria.

CONCLUSION

The pro-rich inequalities in the uptake of IPTp-SP among pregnant women in Nigeria, particularly in urban areas, warrant further attention. Strategies to improve the uptake of IPTp-SP among women residing in socioeconomically disadvantaged geographic zones (North-East and North-West) and improving antenatal visits among the poor women may reduce pro-rich inequality in the uptake of IPTp-SP among pregnant women in Nigeria.

摘要

背景

尽管采用磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶(IPTp-SP)间歇性预防治疗可以预防妊娠疟疾,但它仍然会导致孕产妇发病率和死亡率,特别是在撒哈拉以南非洲和尼日利亚。社会经济不平等导致孕妇对 IPTp-SP 的接受程度有限,因此这是尼日利亚的一个公共卫生挑战。本研究旨在衡量和确定解释尼日利亚孕妇接受 IPTp-SP 方面社会经济不平等的因素。

方法

本研究重新分析了 2018 年尼日利亚人口与健康调查(DHS)中 12294 名 15-49 岁妇女的数据。使用归一化集中指数(C)和集中曲线来量化和图形表示尼日利亚孕妇接受 IPTp-SP 方面的社会经济不平等。对 C 进行分解,以确定导致观察到的接受适当(≥3)IPTp-SP 的社会经济不平等的关键因素。

结果

本研究表明,在尼日利亚,社会经济地位较高的孕妇接受适当的 IPTp-SP 的比例较高(C=0.062;95%置信区间[CI]0.048 至 0.076)。城市地区接受 IPTp-SP 的情况存在富者越富的不平等现象(C=0.283;95%CI0.279 至 0.288)。相比之下,农村地区接受 IPTp-SP 的情况则存在贫者越贫的不平等现象(C=-0.238;95%CI-0.242 至-0.235)。分解分析的结果表明,居住的地理区域和产前检查是尼日利亚较富裕孕妇接受 IPTp-SP 集中的两个主要驱动因素。

结论

尼日利亚孕妇接受 IPTp-SP 的富者越富的不平等现象,特别是在城市地区,需要进一步关注。改善居住在社会经济不利地理区域(东北部和西北部)的妇女接受 IPTp-SP 的情况,并改善贫困妇女的产前检查,可能会减少尼日利亚孕妇接受 IPTp-SP 的富者越富的不平等现象。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/8254225/147caac4a7e0/12936_2021_3834_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/8254225/8b5c060513f8/12936_2021_3834_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/8254225/147caac4a7e0/12936_2021_3834_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/8254225/8b5c060513f8/12936_2021_3834_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/8254225/147caac4a7e0/12936_2021_3834_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Decomposition of socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria in pregnancy in Nigeria: evidence from Demographic Health Survey.尼日利亚孕妇间歇性预防治疗疟疾普及率中社会经济不平等的分解:来自人口健康调查的证据。
Malar J. 2021 Jul 3;20(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03834-8.
2
Socio-demographic and regional disparities in utilization of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy - Nigeria demographic health survey 2013.尼日利亚2013年人口与健康调查:孕期疟疾间歇性预防治疗利用情况的社会人口学及地区差异
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Jan 25;32(Suppl 1):13. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2019.32.1.13345. eCollection 2019.
3
Socioeconomic inequality in intermittent preventive treatment using Sulphadoxine pyrimethamine among pregnant women in Nigeria.尼日利亚孕妇中使用磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶间歇性预防治疗的社会经济不平等。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 4;20(1):1860. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09967-w.
4
Inequities in the use of sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine for malaria prophylaxis during pregnancy in Nigeria.尼日利亚孕期使用周效磺胺-乙胺嘧啶预防疟疾的不平等现象。
Malawi Med J. 2020 Mar;32(1):45-51. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v32i1.9.
5
Predictors for the uptake of optimal doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy in Tanzania: further analysis of the data of the 2015-2016 Tanzania demographic and health survey and malaria indicator survey.预测坦桑尼亚孕妇接受最佳剂量磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶间歇性预防治疗疟疾的因素:对 2015-2016 年坦桑尼亚人口与健康调查和疟疾指标调查数据的进一步分析。
Malar J. 2021 Feb 6;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03616-2.
6
Reaching the unreached: effectiveness and satisfaction with community-directed distribution of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for preventing malaria in pregnancy in rural South-East, Nigeria.触达未被覆盖人群:在尼日利亚东南部农村地区,社区导向分发磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶预防妊娠疟疾的效果和满意度。
Malar J. 2020 Nov 7;19(1):394. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03468-2.
7
Factors affecting uptake of ≥ 3 doses of Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine for malaria prevention in pregnancy in selected health facilities, Arusha region, Tanzania.影响坦桑尼亚阿鲁沙地区选定卫生机构中孕妇接受磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶预防疟疾≥3 剂的因素。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Nov 27;19(1):440. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2592-0.
8
Correlates of uptake of optimal doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine for prevention of malaria during pregnancy in East-Central Uganda.乌干达中东部地区孕妇磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶预防疟疾最佳剂量的使用率的相关因素。
Malar J. 2020 Apr 15;19(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03230-8.
9
Determinants of the optimal uptake of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine doses for intermittent treatment of malaria in pregnancy in urban Nigeria.尼日利亚城市孕妇间歇性治疗疟疾中磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶剂量最佳摄取的决定因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 17;14(1):19097. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52927-2.
10
Determinants of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria among women attending antenatal clinics in primary health care centers in Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria.尼日利亚奥约州奥格博莫索初级卫生保健中心产前诊所就诊妇女疟疾间歇性预防治疗的决定因素
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Jun 11;33:101. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.33.101.14800. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Socio-economic inequalities in malaria prevalence among under-five children in Ghana between 2016 and 2019: a decomposition analysis.2016年至2019年加纳五岁以下儿童疟疾患病率的社会经济不平等:分解分析
Malar J. 2025 May 8;24(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12936-025-05349-y.
2
Uptake of four or more doses of sulfadoxine pyrimethamine for intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy in Zambia: findings from the 2018 malaria in pregnancy survey.赞比亚孕妇在妊娠期间接受 4 剂或更多剂磺胺多辛-乙胺嘧啶间歇性预防治疗疟疾的情况:2018 年妊娠疟疾调查结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 26;13(5):e073287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073287.

本文引用的文献

1
Analysis of equity and social inclusiveness of national urban development policies and strategies through the lenses of health and nutrition.通过健康和营养的视角分析国家城市发展政策和战略的公平性和社会包容性。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Apr 16;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01439-w.
2
Socioeconomic inequality in short birth interval in Ethiopia: a decomposition analysis.埃塞俄比亚短生育间隔中的社会经济不平等:分解分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Oct 6;20(1):1504. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09537-0.
3
Socio-economic inequality in maternal health care utilization in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Togo.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区孕产妇医疗保健利用方面的社会经济不平等:来自多哥的证据。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Mar;36(2):288-301. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3083. Epub 2020 Sep 30.
4
Geographical and socioeconomic inequalities in the utilization of maternal healthcare services in Nigeria: 2003-2017.尼日利亚孕产妇医疗服务利用的地理和社会经济不平等:2003-2017 年。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Sep 10;20(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05700-w.
5
Uptake of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy among women in selected communities of Ebonyi State, Nigeria.尼日利亚埃邦伊州选定社区孕妇间歇性预防治疗疟疾的采用情况。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Dec 2;19(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2629-4.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in maternal health service utilisation: a case of antenatal care in Nigeria using a decomposition approach.社会经济不平等对孕产妇卫生服务利用的影响:以尼日利亚产前护理为例的分解方法。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Nov 8;19(1):1493. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7840-8.
7
Socioeconomic inequality in dental care utilization in Iran: a decomposition approach.伊朗牙科保健利用中的社会经济不平等:分解方法。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Oct 22;18(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1072-5.
8
Measuring horizontal inequity in healthcare utilisation: a review of methodological developments and debates.测量医疗服务利用的水平不公平性:方法学发展与争议的综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):171-180. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01118-2. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
9
Factors associated with uptake of optimal doses of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria among pregnant women in Uganda: analysis of data from the Uganda Demographic and Health Survey, 2016.乌干达孕妇中接受最佳剂量间歇性预防治疗疟疾的因素:乌干达人口与健康调查数据分析,2016 年。
Malar J. 2019 Jul 26;18(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2883-y.
10
Socio-demographic and regional disparities in utilization of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in pregnancy - Nigeria demographic health survey 2013.尼日利亚2013年人口与健康调查:孕期疟疾间歇性预防治疗利用情况的社会人口学及地区差异
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Jan 25;32(Suppl 1):13. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2019.32.1.13345. eCollection 2019.