School of Computer Science, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China; Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Stroke Prevention and Atherosclerosis Research Centre, Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2723-2733. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
Carotid ultrasound measurement of total plaque area (TPA) provides a method for quantifying carotid plaque burden and monitoring changes in carotid atherosclerosis in response to medical treatment. Plaque boundary segmentation is required to generate the TPA measurement; however, training of observers and manual delineation are time consuming. Thus, our objective was to develop an automated plaque segmentation method to generate TPA from longitudinal carotid ultrasound images. In this study, a deep learning-based method, modified U-Net, was used to train the segmentation model and generate TPA measurement. A total of 510 plaques from 144 patients were used in our study, where the Monte Carlo cross-validation was used by randomly splitting the data set into 2/3 and 1/3 for training and testing. Two observers were trained to manually delineate the 510 plaques separately, which were used as the ground-truth references. Two U-Net models (M1 and M2) were trained using the two different ground-truth data sets from the two observers to evaluate the accuracy, variability and sensitivity on the ground-truth data sets used for training our method. The results of the algorithm segmentations of the two models yielded strong agreement with the two manual segmentations with the Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.989 (p < 0.0001) and r = 0.987 (p < 0.0001). Comparison of the U-Net and manual segmentations resulted in mean TPA differences of 0.05 ± 7.13 mm (95% confidence interval: 14.02-13.02 mm) and 0.8 ± 8.7 mm (17.85-16.25 mm) for the two models, which are small compared with the TPA range in our data set from 4.7 to 312.8 mm. Furthermore, the mean time to segment a plaque was only 8.3 ± 3.1 ms. The presented deep learning-based method described has sufficient accuracy with a short computation time and exhibits high agreement between the algorithm and manual TPA measurements, suggesting that the method could be used to measure TPA and to monitor the progression and regression of carotid atherosclerosis.
颈动脉超声总斑块面积(TPA)测量提供了一种量化颈动脉斑块负担和监测颈动脉粥样硬化对治疗反应的方法。生成 TPA 测量值需要进行斑块边界分割;然而,观察者的培训和手动描绘是耗时的。因此,我们的目标是开发一种自动化的斑块分割方法,从纵向颈动脉超声图像中生成 TPA。在这项研究中,使用基于深度学习的方法,即修改后的 U-Net,来训练分割模型并生成 TPA 测量值。我们的研究共使用了 144 名患者的 510 个斑块,通过随机将数据集分为 2/3 和 1/3 进行训练和测试,使用了蒙特卡罗交叉验证。我们训练了两名观察者分别手动描绘 510 个斑块,这些斑块作为地面真实参考。使用来自两名观察者的两个不同的地面真实数据集训练了两个 U-Net 模型(M1 和 M2),以评估在用于训练我们方法的地面真实数据集上的准确性、可变性和敏感性。这两个模型的算法分割结果与两名观察者的手动分割结果具有很强的一致性,皮尔逊相关系数 r 分别为 0.989(p<0.0001)和 0.987(p<0.0001)。与手动分割的比较结果显示,两个模型的 U-Net 分割结果的 TPA 差异平均值分别为 0.05±7.13mm(95%置信区间:14.02-13.02mm)和 0.8±8.7mm(17.85-16.25mm),与我们数据集中 TPA 的范围(4.7-312.8mm)相比,这些差异很小。此外,分割一个斑块的平均时间仅为 8.3±3.1ms。本研究提出的基于深度学习的方法具有足够的准确性,计算时间短,并且算法和手动 TPA 测量之间具有高度的一致性,这表明该方法可用于测量 TPA 并监测颈动脉粥样硬化的进展和消退。