• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于深度学习的 B 型超声图像中总斑块面积的测量。

Deep Learning-Based Measurement of Total Plaque Area in B-Mode Ultrasound Images.

出版信息

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Aug;25(8):2967-2977. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3060163. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2021.3060163
PMID:33600328
Abstract

Measurement of total-plaque-area (TPA) is important for determining long term risk for stroke and monitoring carotid plaque progression. Since delineation of carotid plaques is required, a deep learning method can provide automatic plaque segmentations and TPA measurements; however, it requires large datasets and manual annotations for training with unknown performance on new datasets. A UNet++ ensemble algorithm was proposed to segment plaques from 2D carotid ultrasound images, trained on three small datasets (n = 33, 33, 34 subjects) and tested on 44 subjects from the SPARC dataset (n = 144, London, Canada). The ensemble was also trained on the entire SPARC dataset and tested with a different dataset (n = 497, Zhongnan Hospital, China). Algorithm and manual segmentations were compared using Dice-similarity-coefficient (DSC), and TPAs were compared using the difference ( ∆TPA), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and Bland-Altman analyses. Segmentation variability was determined using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient-of-variation (CoV). For 44 SPARC subjects, algorithm DSC was 83.3-85.7%, and algorithm TPAs were strongly correlated (r = 0.985-0.988; p < 0.001) with manual results with marginal biases (0.73-6.75) mm using the three training datasets. Algorithm ICC for TPAs (ICC = 0.996) was similar to intra- and inter-observer manual results (ICC = 0.977, 0.995). Algorithm CoV = 6.98% for plaque areas was smaller than the inter-observer manual CoV (7.54%). For the Zhongnan dataset, DSC was 88.6% algorithm and manual TPAs were strongly correlated (r = 0.972, p < 0.001) with ∆TPA = -0.44 ±4.05 mm and ICC = 0.985. The proposed algorithm trained on small datasets and segmented a different dataset without retraining with accuracy and precision that may be useful clinically and for research.

摘要

总斑块面积(TPA)的测量对于确定中风的长期风险和监测颈动脉斑块进展非常重要。由于需要对颈动脉斑块进行描绘,深度学习方法可以提供自动的斑块分割和 TPA 测量;但是,它需要大型数据集和手动注释,并且在新数据集上的性能未知。提出了一种 UNet++ 集成算法,用于从 2D 颈动脉超声图像中分割斑块,该算法在三个小数据集(n=33、33、34 名受试者)上进行了训练,并在 SPARC 数据集的 44 名受试者(n=144、伦敦、加拿大)上进行了测试。该集合还在整个 SPARC 数据集上进行了训练,并在不同的数据集(n=497、Zhongnan 医院,中国)上进行了测试。使用 Dice 相似系数(DSC)比较算法和手动分割,使用差异(∆TPA)、Pearson 相关系数(r)和 Bland-Altman 分析比较 TPA。使用组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数(CoV)确定分割变异性。对于 44 名 SPARC 受试者,算法的 DSC 为 83.3-85.7%,算法的 TPA 与手动结果高度相关(r=0.985-0.988;p<0.001),具有边缘偏差(0.73-6.75)mm,使用三个训练数据集。TPA 的算法 ICC(ICC=0.996)与内-和观察者手动结果相似(ICC=0.977,0.995)。斑块面积的算法 CoV(CoV=6.98%)小于观察者手动 CoV(7.54%)。对于 Zhongnan 数据集,DSC 为 88.6%,算法和手动 TPA 高度相关(r=0.972,p<0.001),差异(∆TPA)=-0.44±4.05mm,ICC=0.985。该算法在小型数据集上进行训练,无需重新训练即可分割不同的数据集,其准确性和精度在临床上和研究中可能都很有用。

相似文献

1
Deep Learning-Based Measurement of Total Plaque Area in B-Mode Ultrasound Images.基于深度学习的 B 型超声图像中总斑块面积的测量。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2021 Aug;25(8):2967-2977. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2021.3060163. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
2
An image registration-based self-supervised Su-Net for carotid plaque ultrasound image segmentation.基于图像配准的自监督 Su-Net 颈动脉斑块超声图像分割。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2024 Feb;244:107957. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107957. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
3
Ultrasound carotid plaque segmentation via image reconstruction-based self-supervised learning with limited training labels.基于图像重建的有限标签监督学习的颈动脉斑块超声分割。
Math Biosci Eng. 2023 Jan;20(2):1617-1636. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023074. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
4
Deep Learning-Based Carotid Plaque Segmentation from B-Mode Ultrasound Images.基于深度学习的 B 型超声图像颈动脉斑块分割。
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021 Sep;47(9):2723-2733. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.05.023. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
5
Semiautomatic quantification of carotid plaque volume with three-dimensional ultrasound imaging.利用三维超声成像对颈动脉斑块体积进行半自动定量分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 May;65(5):1407-1417. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.11.033. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Carotid Vessel-Wall-Volume Ultrasound Measurement via a UNet++ Ensemble Algorithm Trained on Small Data Sets.通过在小数据集上训练的UNet++集成算法进行颈动脉血管壁容积超声测量
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2023 Apr;49(4):1031-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2022.12.005. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
7
Semiautomatic segmentation of atherosclerotic carotid artery wall volume using 3D ultrasound imaging.使用三维超声成像对动脉粥样硬化颈动脉壁体积进行半自动分割。
Med Phys. 2015 Apr;42(4):2029-43. doi: 10.1118/1.4915925.
8
Deep learning-based carotid media-adventitia and lumen-intima boundary segmentation from three-dimensional ultrasound images.基于深度学习的三维超声图像颈动脉中膜-外膜和管腔-内膜边界分割。
Med Phys. 2019 Jul;46(7):3180-3193. doi: 10.1002/mp.13581. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
Carotid plaque segmentation from three-dimensional ultrasound images by direct three-dimensional sparse field level-set optimization.基于三维稀疏域水平集优化的三维超声颈动脉斑块分割。
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Mar 1;94:27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Jan 11.
10
Hybrid deep learning segmentation models for atherosclerotic plaque in internal carotid artery B-mode ultrasound.用于颈内动脉B型超声中动脉粥样硬化斑块的混合深度学习分割模型
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Sep;136:104721. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104721. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Observer Variability in CT Angiography Carotid Segmentation: Assessing Variability to Set Minimum Clinical Performance.CT血管造影颈动脉分割中的观察者变异性:评估变异性以设定最低临床性能
J Neuroimaging. 2025 May-Jun;35(3):e70058. doi: 10.1111/jon.70058.
2
Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of arterial vessel walls and plaques in MR vessel wall images for quantitative assessment.基于深度学习的磁共振血管壁图像中动脉血管壁和斑块的自动分割用于定量评估。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11697-9.
3
Cardiovascular Disease Risk Stratification Using Hybrid Deep Learning Paradigm: First of Its Kind on Canadian Trial Data.
使用混合深度学习范式进行心血管疾病风险分层:首次应用于加拿大试验数据
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 28;14(17):1894. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171894.
4
A deep learning algorithm to identify carotid plaques and assess their stability.一种用于识别颈动脉斑块并评估其稳定性的深度学习算法。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jun 17;7:1321884. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1321884. eCollection 2024.
5
Deep learning approach for cardiovascular disease risk stratification and survival analysis on a Canadian cohort.基于加拿大队列的心血管疾病风险分层和生存分析的深度学习方法
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024 Jun;40(6):1283-1303. doi: 10.1007/s10554-024-03100-3. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
6
Application and prospects of AI-based radiomics in ultrasound diagnosis.基于人工智能的放射组学在超声诊断中的应用与前景
Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2023 Oct 13;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s42492-023-00147-2.
7
Ultrasound-Based Image Analysis for Predicting Carotid Artery Stenosis Risk: A Comprehensive Review of the Problem, Techniques, Datasets, and Future Directions.基于超声的图像分析预测颈动脉狭窄风险:对问题、技术、数据集及未来方向的全面综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Aug 7;13(15):2614. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152614.
8
Cardiovascular disease/stroke risk stratification in deep learning framework: a review.深度学习框架下的心血管疾病/中风风险分层:综述
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2023 Jun 30;13(3):557-598. doi: 10.21037/cdt-22-438. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
9
Cardiovascular/Stroke Risk Stratification in Diabetic Foot Infection Patients Using Deep Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence: An Investigative Study.使用基于深度学习的人工智能对糖尿病足感染患者进行心血管/中风风险分层:一项调查研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 19;11(22):6844. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226844.
10
HRU-Net: A Transfer Learning Method for Carotid Artery Plaque Segmentation in Ultrasound Images.HRU-Net:一种用于超声图像中颈动脉斑块分割的迁移学习方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 17;12(11):2852. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112852.