Suppr超能文献

透过全球危机视角审视左右分歧:意识形态差异及其对新冠疫情应对措施的影响

Examining the Left-Right Divide Through the Lens of a Global Crisis: Ideological Differences and Their Implications for Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

作者信息

Ruisch Benjamin Coe, Moore Courtney, Granados Samayoa Javier, Boggs Shelby, Ladanyi Jesse, Fazio Russell

机构信息

The Ohio State University.

出版信息

Polit Psychol. 2021 Oct;42(5):795-816. doi: 10.1111/pops.12740. Epub 2021 May 5.

Abstract

The COVID-19 disease pandemic is one of the most pressing global health issues of our time. Nevertheless, responses to the pandemic exhibit a stark ideological divide, with political conservatives (versus liberals/progressives) expressing less concern about the virus and less behavioral compliance with efforts to combat it. Drawing from decades of research on the psychological underpinnings of ideology, in four studies (total  = 4441) we examine the factors that contribute to the ideological gap in pandemic response-across domains including personality (e.g., empathic concern), attitudes (e.g., trust in science), information (e.g., COVID-19 knowledge), vulnerability (e.g., preexisting medical conditions), demographics (e.g., education, income) and environment (e.g., local COVID-19 infection rates). This work provides insight into the most proximal drivers of this ideological divide and also helps fill a long-standing theoretical and empirical gap regarding how these various ideological differences shape responses to complex real-world sociopolitical events. Among our key findings are the central role of attitude- and belief-related factors (e.g., trust in science and trust in Trump)-and the relatively weaker influence of several domain-general personality factors (empathic concern, disgust sensitivity, conspiratorial ideation). We conclude by considering possible explanations for these findings and their broader implications for our understanding of political ideology.

摘要

新冠疫情是我们这个时代最紧迫的全球健康问题之一。然而,对这一疫情的应对呈现出明显的意识形态分歧,政治保守派(与自由派/进步派相对)对病毒的担忧较少,在抗击疫情的努力中行为上的依从性也较低。基于数十年来对意识形态心理基础的研究,我们通过四项研究(总计4441人)考察了导致疫情应对中意识形态差距的因素,这些因素涵盖多个领域,包括人格(如同情关怀)、态度(如对科学的信任)、信息(如新冠知识)、易感性(如既往病史)、人口统计学特征(如教育程度、收入)以及环境(如当地新冠感染率)。这项工作深入了解了这种意识形态分歧最直接的驱动因素,也有助于填补长期存在的理论和实证空白,即这些不同的意识形态差异如何塑造对复杂现实世界社会政治事件的反应。我们的主要发现包括态度和信念相关因素(如对科学的信任和对特朗普的信任)的核心作用,以及几个一般领域人格因素(同情关怀、厌恶敏感性、阴谋论思维)相对较弱的影响。我们通过思考这些发现的可能解释及其对我们理解政治意识形态的更广泛影响来得出结论。

相似文献

3
Sensitive liberals and unfeeling conservatives? .敏感的自由派和麻木不仁的保守派?
Politics Life Sci. 2023 Mar;41(2):256-275. doi: 10.1017/pls.2022.18.
8
Past-focused environmental comparisons promote proenvironmental outcomes for conservatives.关注过去的环境比较促进了保守派的环保成果。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 27;113(52):14953-14957. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1610834113. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
9
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.

引用本文的文献

3
Mindware: Critical Thinking in Everyday Life.思维工具:日常生活中的批判性思维。
J Intell. 2024 Feb 2;12(2):17. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020017.

本文引用的文献

6
A matter of taste: Gustatory sensitivity predicts political ideology.品味问题:味觉敏感度可预测政治意识形态。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021 Aug;121(2):394-409. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000365. Epub 2020 Sep 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验