Ping An Healthcare Technology, Ping An Insurance Group Company of China, Shenzhen, China.
School of Medicine and Vanke School of Public Health Beijing, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e045886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045886.
This study quantified how the efficiency of testing and contact tracing impacts the spread of COVID-19. The average time interval between infection and quarantine, whether asymptomatic cases are tested or not, and initial delays to beginning a testing and tracing programme were investigated.
We developed a novel individual-level network model, called CoTECT (Testing Efficiency and Contact Tracing model for COVID-19), using key parameters from recent studies to quantify the impacts of testing and tracing efficiency. The model distinguishes infection from confirmation by integrating a 'T' compartment, which represents infections confirmed by testing and quarantine. The compartments of presymptomatic (E), asymptomatic (I), symptomatic (Is), and death with (F) or without (f) test confirmation were also included in the model. Three scenarios were evaluated in a closed population of 3000 individuals to mimic community-level dynamics. Real-world data from four Nordic countries were also analysed.
Simulation result: total/peak daily infections and confirmed cases, total deaths (confirmed/unconfirmed by testing), fatalities and the case fatality rate. Real-world analysis: confirmed cases and deaths per million people.
(1) Shortening the duration between Is and T from 12 to 4 days reduces infections by 85.2% and deaths by 88.8%. (2) Testing and tracing regardless of symptoms reduce infections by 35.7% and deaths by 46.2% compared with testing only symptomatic cases. (3) Reducing the delay to implementing a testing and tracing programme from 50 to 10 days reduces infections by 35.2% and deaths by 44.6%. These results were robust to sensitivity analysis. An analysis of real-world data showed that tests per case early in the pandemic are critical for reducing confirmed cases and the fatality rate.
Reducing testing delays will help to contain outbreaks. These results provide policymakers with quantitative evidence of efficiency as a critical value in developing testing and contact tracing strategies.
本研究量化了检测和接触者追踪效率对 COVID-19 传播的影响。研究调查了从感染到隔离的平均时间间隔、是否对无症状病例进行检测以及开始检测和追踪计划的初始延迟。
我们使用来自最近研究的关键参数开发了一种新型个体网络模型,称为 CoTECT(COVID-19 的检测效率和接触者追踪模型),以量化检测和追踪效率的影响。该模型通过整合代表通过检测和隔离确认的感染的“T”隔室来区分感染和确认。模型还包括无症状感染(E)、无症状感染(I)、有症状感染(Is)和死亡(有或没有检测确认的 F 和 f)的隔室。在一个 3000 人的封闭人群中模拟社区级动态,评估了三个场景。还分析了来自四个北欧国家的真实数据。
模拟结果:总/高峰日感染人数和确诊病例数、总死亡人数(通过检测确诊/未确诊)、死亡率和病死率。真实世界分析:每百万人确诊病例数和死亡人数。
(1)将 Is 和 T 之间的持续时间从 12 天缩短到 4 天,可使感染人数减少 85.2%,死亡人数减少 88.8%。(2)与仅对有症状病例进行检测相比,无论症状如何进行检测和追踪,可使感染人数减少 35.7%,死亡人数减少 46.2%。(3)将实施检测和追踪计划的延迟从 50 天减少到 10 天,可使感染人数减少 35.2%,死亡人数减少 44.6%。这些结果对敏感性分析具有稳健性。对真实世界数据的分析表明,在大流行早期进行的每例病例检测对于减少确诊病例和病死率至关重要。
减少检测延迟将有助于遏制疫情爆发。这些结果为政策制定者提供了效率作为制定检测和接触者追踪策略的关键值的定量证据。