• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府干预应对 2019 年冠状病毒病的影响。

Impact of Government Intervention in Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019.

机构信息

National Disaster Management Research Institute, Ulsan 44538, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316070.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192316070
PMID:36498144
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9739096/
Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) led to the loss of lives and had serious social and economic effects. Countries implemented various quarantine policies to reduce the effects. The countries were divided into low- and high-risk groups based on the differences in quarantine policies and their levels of infection. Quarantine policies that significantly contributed to risk reduction were determined by analyzing 11 quarantine indicators for reducing the spread of COVID-19. The cross-tabulation and Chi-square tests were used to compare the quarantine policies by the groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the useful quarantine policies implemented by the low-risk group to verify quarantine policies for minimizing the negative effects. The analysis showed that the low- and medium-risk groups showed significant differences for 9 of the 11 indicators, and 4 of these differentiated the low- from the medium-risk group. Countries with strict quarantine policies related to workplace closure and staying at home were more likely to be included in the low-risk group. These policies had a significant impact in the low-risk countries and could contribute to reducing the spread and effects of COVID-19 in countries included in the high-risk group.

摘要

2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)导致了生命的丧失,并产生了严重的社会和经济影响。各国实施了各种检疫政策以减轻其影响。根据检疫政策和感染程度的差异,将各国分为低风险和高风险组。通过分析 11 项可降低 COVID-19 传播风险的检疫指标,确定了对降低风险有显著贡献的检疫政策。采用交叉列表和卡方检验比较了不同组别的检疫政策。采用多变量逻辑回归确定了低风险组实施的有用检疫政策,以验证将负面影响降至最低的检疫政策。分析表明,11 项指标中有 9 项在低风险和中等风险组之间存在显著差异,其中 4 项将低风险和中风险组区分开来。与关闭工作场所和居家相关的严格检疫政策的国家更有可能被纳入低风险组。这些政策在低风险国家中产生了重大影响,有助于减少高风险组国家 COVID-19 的传播和影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25ea/9739096/37581bf806d8/ijerph-19-16070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25ea/9739096/6de50615e03b/ijerph-19-16070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25ea/9739096/d2a78d331882/ijerph-19-16070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25ea/9739096/37581bf806d8/ijerph-19-16070-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25ea/9739096/6de50615e03b/ijerph-19-16070-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25ea/9739096/d2a78d331882/ijerph-19-16070-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/25ea/9739096/37581bf806d8/ijerph-19-16070-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Government Intervention in Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019.政府干预应对 2019 年冠状病毒病的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 1;19(23):16070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316070.
2
Early public adherence with and support for stay-at-home COVID-19 mitigation strategies despite adverse life impact: a transnational cross-sectional survey study in the United States and Australia.尽管对生活产生了不利影响,公众仍早期坚持并支持 COVID-19 居家缓解策略:一项针对美国和澳大利亚的跨国横断面调查研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;21(1):503. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10410-x.
3
Travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.旅行相关的控制措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 5;10:CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.
4
The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries.引入和取消非药物干预措施与 SARS-CoV-2 时变繁殖数(R)之间的时间关联:131 个国家的建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30785-4. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
International travel-related control measures to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a rapid review.国际旅行相关防控措施以遏制 COVID-19 大流行:快速综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 25;3(3):CD013717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013717.pub2.
6
Impact of self-imposed prevention measures and short-term government-imposed social distancing on mitigating and delaying a COVID-19 epidemic: A modelling study.自行采取预防措施和短期政府实施社会隔离对减轻和延缓 COVID-19 疫情的影响:建模研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Jul 21;17(7):e1003166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003166. eCollection 2020 Jul.
7
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
8
Assessment of Quarantine Understanding and Adherence to Lockdown Measures During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Palestine: Community Experience and Evidence for Action.评估巴勒斯坦在 COVID-19 大流行期间的隔离理解和对封锁措施的遵守情况:社区经验和行动证据。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 2;9:570242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.570242. eCollection 2021.
9
Public health effects of travel-related policies on the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed-methods systematic review.旅行相关政策对 COVID-19 大流行的公共卫生影响:一项混合方法系统评价。
J Infect. 2021 Oct;83(4):413-423. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2021.07.017. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
10
Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.单独隔离或与其他公共卫生措施相结合以控制新冠病毒病:一项快速综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013574.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.社交距离措施和封锁措施在减少非医疗、社区环境中的 COVID-19 传播方面的效果。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230132. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0132. Epub 2023 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Role of institutional, cultural and economic factors in the effectiveness of lockdown measures.制度、文化和经济因素在封锁措施效果中的作用。
Int J Infect Dis. 2022 Mar;116:111-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.12.333. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
Predicted Impact of the Lockdown Measure in Response to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Greater Bangkok, Thailand, 2021.2021 年泰国曼谷大府应对 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)封锁措施的预测影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 5;18(23):12816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182312816.
3
Role of efficient testing and contact tracing in mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic: a network modelling study.
有效检测和接触者追踪在缓解 COVID-19 大流行中的作用:网络建模研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e045886. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045886.
4
Lessons from countries implementing find, test, trace, isolation and support policies in the rapid response of the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.从实施“发现、检测、追踪、隔离和支持”政策的国家吸取的经验教训:COVID-19 大流行快速反应的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 29;11(7):e047832. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047832.
5
Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak Quarantine, Isolation, and Lockdown Policies on Mental Health and Suicide.2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫情的隔离、检疫及封锁政策对心理健康和自杀的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 16;12:565190. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.565190. eCollection 2021.
6
A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker).一个全球性的大流行病政策面板数据库(牛津 COVID-19 政府应对追踪器)。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):529-538. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
7
Inferring the effectiveness of government interventions against COVID-19.推断政府干预 COVID-19 的效果。
Science. 2021 Feb 19;371(6531). doi: 10.1126/science.abd9338. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
8
Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany.口罩大大减少了德国的 COVID-19 病例。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32293-32301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015954117. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
Are Lockdown Measures Effective Against COVID-19? lockdown 措施对 COVID-19 有效吗?
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 22;8:549692. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.549692. eCollection 2020.
10
Association of Country-wide Coronavirus Mortality with Demographics, Testing, Lockdowns, and Public Wearing of Masks.全国冠状病毒死亡率与人口统计学、检测、封锁和公众戴口罩的关系。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Dec;103(6):2400-2411. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-1015. Epub 2020 Oct 26.