Department of Biomedical and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
Gut Microbes. 2021 Jan-Dec;13(1):1943289. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2021.1943289.
The need for alternative treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) has triggered copious amounts of research into microbial therapies focused on manipulating the microbiota-gut-brain axis. This comprehensive review was intended to present and systematically evaluate the current clinical and preclinical evidence for various probiotic and commensal gut microbial therapies as treatments for MS, using the Bradford Hill criteria (BHC) as a multi-parameter assessment rubric. Literature searches were performed to identify a total of 37 relevant studies (6 human, 31 animal), including 28 probiotic therapy and 9 commensal therapy studies. In addition to presenting qualitative summaries of these findings, therapeutic evidence for each bacterial formulation was assessed using the BHC to generate summative scores. These scores, which encompassed study quality, replication, and other considerations, were used to rank the most promising therapies and highlight deficiencies. Several therapeutic formulations, including VSL#3, Nissle 1917, and , emerged as the most promising. In contrast, a number of other therapies were hindered by limited evidence of replicable findings and other criteria, which need to be addressed by future studies in order to harness gut microbial therapies to ultimately provide cheaper, safer, and more durable treatments for MS.
对于多发性硬化症(MS)的替代治疗的需求,引发了大量针对微生物疗法的研究,这些研究集中在操纵微生物群-肠道-大脑轴上。本综述旨在使用布拉德福德·希尔标准(BHC)作为多参数评估准则,介绍和系统评估各种益生菌和共生肠道微生物疗法作为 MS 治疗方法的当前临床前和临床证据。进行了文献检索,共确定了 37 项相关研究(6 项人体,31 项动物),包括 28 项益生菌治疗和 9 项共生治疗研究。除了对这些发现进行定性总结外,还使用 BHC 评估每种细菌配方的治疗证据,以生成综合评分。这些评分涵盖了研究质量、复制性和其他考虑因素,用于对最有前途的疗法进行排名,并突出其缺陷。一些治疗配方,包括 VSL#3、Nissle 1917 和 ,被认为是最有前途的。相比之下,其他一些疗法受到可复制发现和其他标准的证据有限的限制,需要通过未来的研究来解决这些问题,以便利用肠道微生物疗法最终为 MS 提供更便宜、更安全、更持久的治疗方法。