Simon Colin, Bolton David A E, Kennedy Niamh C, Soekadar Surjo R, Ruddy Kathy L
Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jul 2;15:699428. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.699428. eCollection 2021.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) provide a unique technological solution to circumvent the damaged motor system. For neurorehabilitation, the BCI can be used to translate neural signals associated with movement intentions into tangible feedback for the patient, when they are unable to generate functional movement themselves. Clinical interest in BCI is growing rapidly, as it would facilitate rehabilitation to commence earlier following brain damage and provides options for patients who are unable to partake in traditional physical therapy. However, substantial challenges with existing BCI implementations have prevented its widespread adoption. Recent advances in knowledge and technology provide opportunities to facilitate a change, provided that researchers and clinicians using BCI agree on standardisation of guidelines for protocols and shared efforts to uncover mechanisms. We propose that addressing the speed and effectiveness of learning BCI control are priorities for the field, which may be improved by multimodal or multi-stage approaches harnessing more sensitive neuroimaging technologies in the early learning stages, before transitioning to more practical, mobile implementations. Clarification of the neural mechanisms that give rise to improvement in motor function is an essential next step towards justifying clinical use of BCI. In particular, quantifying the unknown contribution of non-motor mechanisms to motor recovery calls for more stringent control conditions in experimental work. Here we provide a contemporary viewpoint on the factors impeding the scalability of BCI. Further, we provide a future outlook for optimal design of the technology to best exploit its unique potential, and best practices for research and reporting of findings.
脑机接口(BCIs)为绕过受损的运动系统提供了一种独特的技术解决方案。对于神经康复而言,当患者自身无法产生功能性运动时,脑机接口可用于将与运动意图相关的神经信号转化为患者可感知的反馈。脑机接口在临床上的关注度正在迅速增长,因为它有助于在脑损伤后更早地开始康复治疗,并为无法参与传统物理治疗的患者提供了选择。然而,现有脑机接口实施方案存在的重大挑战阻碍了其广泛应用。知识和技术方面的最新进展为促进变革提供了机会,前提是使用脑机接口的研究人员和临床医生就协议指南的标准化以及共同努力揭示机制达成一致。我们认为,解决脑机接口控制学习的速度和有效性是该领域的首要任务,在过渡到更实用的移动实施方案之前,可通过在早期学习阶段采用多模态或多阶段方法利用更敏感的神经成像技术来加以改进。阐明导致运动功能改善的神经机制是证明脑机接口临床应用合理性的关键的下一步。特别是,量化非运动机制对运动恢复的未知贡献需要在实验工作中设置更严格的对照条件。在此,我们提供了关于阻碍脑机接口可扩展性因素的当代观点。此外,我们还对该技术的优化设计提出了未来展望,以充分发挥其独特潜力,并给出了研究和报告结果的最佳实践方法。