• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当今和 50 年前一般人群对器官解剖位置和医学术语的了解:一项复制研究。

General population's knowledge about the anatomical locations of organs and medical terms today and 50 years ago: a replication study.

机构信息

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, III. Department of Internal Medicine, Hamburg, Germany.

University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Center for Experimental Medicine, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jun 15;38(5):Doc94. doi: 10.3205/zma001490. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3205/zma001490
PMID:34286074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8256121/
Abstract

Physicians are frequently not aware that patients may not be familiar with the meaning of medical terms or have limited knowledge about the location of organs. These aspects of functional health competence require particular attention when designing communication curricula for undergraduate medical students. The aim of our study was to evaluate the knowledge of laypersons about the anatomical locations of organs and the definitions of commonly used medical terms as relevant aspects of health literacy. Furthermore, we wished to compare it with the knowledge of a historical patient cohort who performed this study 50 years ago. In this replication study, multiple-choice questionnaires with simple anatomy and common medical terms which were published in 1970 were distributed among a convenience sample of lay volunteers (n=537) from the streets of Hamburg, Germany. Sociodemographic data including sex, age, highest educational school achievement, occupation in a field associated with medicine, and German as first language were also collected. The percentage of laypersons' correct answers was compared to the percentage of correct answers of a historical patient cohort (n=234) published in 1970 to identify the development of health literacy as basis for curricular planning. Laypersons showed significantly more correct answers in four of eight simple anatomical locations of organs (p<0.001). For seven commonly used medical terms laypersons only gave significantly more correct answers for the definitions of "jaundice" (p<0.001) and "diarrhoea" (p=0.001) compared to the historical cohort from 1970. Participants with a senior high school degree performed significantly better with respect to total scores of correct organ locations (<0.001, =0.35) and correct definitions of medical terms (=0.001, =0.30) than participants who completed junior high school. The definitions of common medical terms and the correct anatomical locations of organs by laypersons have increased during the past 50 years but could still need improvement by school education and media information of better quality. Medical educators should know about the low health literacy of laypersons with respect to these aspects to raise medical students' awareness for this problem and to provide communication training for medical students to use comprehensible language during history taking and shared decision making.

摘要

医生经常没有意识到患者可能不熟悉医学术语的含义,或者对器官位置的了解有限。在为医学生设计沟通课程时,这些功能健康能力的方面需要特别注意。我们的研究目的是评估非专业人士对器官解剖位置和常用医学术语定义的了解,作为健康素养的相关方面。此外,我们希望将其与 50 年前进行这项研究的历史患者队列的知识进行比较。在这项复制研究中,向德国汉堡街头的便利样本非专业志愿者(n=537)分发了带有简单解剖学和常用医学术语的多项选择题问卷。还收集了社会人口统计学数据,包括性别、年龄、最高教育学校成就、与医学相关的职业以及第一语言为德语。将非专业人士的正确答案百分比与 1970 年发表的历史患者队列(n=234)的正确答案百分比进行比较,以确定健康素养的发展作为课程规划的基础。非专业人士在八个器官简单解剖位置中的四个位置上的正确答案比例明显更高(p<0.001)。对于七个常用医学术语,与 1970 年的历史队列相比,非专业人士仅对“黄疸”(p<0.001)和“腹泻”(p=0.001)的定义给出了明显更高的正确答案。具有高中文凭的参与者在正确回答器官位置的总分数(<0.001,=0.35)和正确回答医学术语的定义(=0.001,=0.30)方面的表现明显优于完成初中的参与者。在过去的 50 年中,非专业人士对常见医学术语的定义和器官的正确解剖位置有所提高,但通过学校教育和更好质量的媒体信息仍需要改进。医学教育者应该了解非专业人士在这些方面的健康素养较低,以提高医学生对这一问题的认识,并为医学生提供沟通培训,以便在问诊和共同决策时使用可理解的语言。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa64/8256121/e7770beda20a/JME-38-5-94-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa64/8256121/79f3c6f2b5f0/JME-38-5-94-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa64/8256121/e4bfe475898a/JME-38-5-94-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa64/8256121/e7770beda20a/JME-38-5-94-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa64/8256121/79f3c6f2b5f0/JME-38-5-94-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa64/8256121/e4bfe475898a/JME-38-5-94-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa64/8256121/e7770beda20a/JME-38-5-94-g-001.jpg

相似文献

1
General population's knowledge about the anatomical locations of organs and medical terms today and 50 years ago: a replication study.当今和 50 年前一般人群对器官解剖位置和医学术语的了解:一项复制研究。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jun 15;38(5):Doc94. doi: 10.3205/zma001490. eCollection 2021.
2
Do they know too little? An inter-institutional study on the anatomical knowledge of upper-year medical students based on multiple choice questions of a progress test.他们了解得太少了吗?一项基于进步测试多项选择题的机构间研究,关于高年级医学生的解剖学知识。
Ann Anat. 2017 Jan;209:93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
3
An assessment of the anatomical knowledge of laypersons and their attitudes towards the clinical importance of gross anatomy in medicine.对外行人解剖学知识及其对大体解剖学在医学中临床重要性态度的评估。
Ann Anat. 2016 Nov;208:194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
4
Assessing minimal medical statistical literacy using the Quick Risk Test: a prospective observational study in Germany.使用快速风险测试评估基本医学统计素养:德国的一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 23;8(8):e020847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020847.
5
Knowledge about Ultraviolet Radiation Hazards and Tanning Behavior of Cosmetology and Medical Students.美容专业和医学专业学生对紫外线辐射危害及晒黑行为的认知
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2016 Apr;24(1):73-7.
6
Effectiveness of a Comprehensive Health Literacy Consultation Skills Training for Undergraduate Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial.综合性健康素养咨询技能培训对本科医学生的效果:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 20;17(1):81. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010081.
7
[Deficits in Health-Literacy of Inpatients - a Cross-Sectional Study].[住院患者健康素养缺陷——一项横断面研究]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2019 Feb;144(4):e21-e29. doi: 10.1055/a-0758-0647. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
8
Self-Perception of Medical Students' Knowledge and Interest in Disaster Medicine: Nine Years After the Approval of the Curriculum in German Universities.德国大学灾难医学课程获批九年后医学生对灾难医学知识及兴趣的自我认知
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017 Aug;32(4):374-381. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17000280. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Health literacy profiles of medical students in an Australian Doctor of Medicine programme: A cross-sectional study using the Health Literacy Questionnaire.医学专业留学生健康素养评价:基于健康素养问卷的横断面研究。
Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Jul;35(3):617-627. doi: 10.1002/hpja.790. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
10
[The comparison of 4th, 5th and 6th year medical students knowledge of rules and practical skills in the interpretation of electrocardiograms at Jagiellonian University].[雅盖隆大学医学专业四年级、五年级和六年级学生在心电图解读方面的规则知识与实践技能比较]
Przegl Lek. 2012;69(4):143-8.

引用本文的文献

1
How Do Team-Level and Individual-Level Linguistic Styles Affect Patients' Emotional Well-Being-Evidence from Online Doctor Teams.团队和个体语言风格如何影响患者的情绪健康——来自在线医生团队的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1915. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031915.
2
Focus on patients in medical education.医学教育以患者为中心。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Jun 15;38(5):Doc97. doi: 10.3205/zma001493. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical and Ethical Considerations for Schools Using Social Media to Promote Physical Literacy in Youth.利用社交媒体促进青少年身体素养的学校的实用和伦理考虑。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 14;17(4):1225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041225.
2
Can Patients Trust Online Health Information? A Meta-narrative Systematic Review Addressing the Quality of Health Information on the Internet.患者能信任网上的健康信息吗?一项针对互联网健康信息质量的元叙述系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(9):1884-1891. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05109-0. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
3
[Deficits in Health-Literacy of Inpatients - a Cross-Sectional Study].
[住院患者健康素养缺陷——一项横断面研究]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2019 Feb;144(4):e21-e29. doi: 10.1055/a-0758-0647. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
4
Understanding your body matters: Effects of an entertainment-education serial radio drama on fertility awareness in Rwanda.了解你的身体很重要:娱乐教育系列广播剧对卢旺达生育意识的影响。
J Health Commun. 2018;23(8):761-772. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2018.1527873. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
5
What do the public know about anatomy? Anatomy education to the public and the implications.公众对解剖学了解多少?公众的解剖学教育及影响。
Anat Sci Educ. 2018 Mar;11(2):117-123. doi: 10.1002/ase.1746. Epub 2017 Nov 7.
6
Social Media: A Path to Health Literacy.社交媒体:通往健康素养之路。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:464-475.
7
Health Literacy in the German Population.德国人口的健康素养。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2017 Jan 27;114(4):53-60. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0053.
8
MediLex: the medical jargon-busting game.医学词汇破解游戏:MediLex
Clin Teach. 2017 Aug;14(4):273-278. doi: 10.1111/tct.12547. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
9
Communication in Health Professions: A European consensus on inter- and multi-professional learning objectives in German.卫生专业中的沟通:德语版关于跨专业和多专业学习目标的欧洲共识。
GMS J Med Educ. 2016 Apr 29;33(2):Doc23. doi: 10.3205/zma001022. eCollection 2016.
10
Out of the classroom and into the community: medical students consolidate learning about health literacy through collaboration with Head Start.走出教室,走进社区:医学生通过与启蒙计划合作巩固健康素养学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Apr 23;16:121. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0635-z.