Ai Ting, Adams Glenn, Zhao Xian
Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 6;12:647830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647830. eCollection 2021.
Why do people comply with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health guidance? This study considers cultural-psychological foundations of variation in beliefs about motivations for such compliance. Specifically, we focused on beliefs about two sources of prosocial motivation: desire to protect others and obligation to society. Across two studies, we observed that the relative emphasis on the desire to protect others (vs. the obligation to the community) as an explanation for compliance was greater in the United States settings associated with cultural ecologies of abstracted independence than in Chinese settings associated with cultural ecologies of embedded interdependence. We observed these patterns for explanations of psychological experience of both others (Study 1) and self (Study 2), and for compliance with mandates for both social distancing and face masks (Study 2). Discussion of results considers both practical implications for motivating compliance with public health guidance and theoretical implications for denaturalizing prevailing accounts of prosocial motivation.
为什么人们会遵守2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的公共卫生指导意见?本研究探讨了关于这种遵守行为动机的信念差异的文化心理基础。具体而言,我们关注关于亲社会动机两个来源的信念:保护他人的愿望和对社会的义务。在两项研究中,我们观察到,与抽象独立的文化生态相关的美国环境中,作为遵守行为解释的对保护他人愿望(相对于对社区的义务)的相对强调,大于与嵌入式相互依赖的文化生态相关的中国环境。我们在对他人(研究1)和自我(研究2)心理体验的解释中,以及在对社交距离和口罩佩戴规定的遵守情况(研究2)中都观察到了这些模式。结果讨论既考虑了对促使遵守公共卫生指导意见的实际意义,也考虑了对使亲社会动机的主流解释非自然化的理论意义。
Environ Res. 2022-4-1
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018-5-9
Pers Individ Dif. 2021-3
Western Pac Surveill Response J. 2023
Med Anthropol Theory. 2019-12-16
Pers Individ Dif. 2021-8
Front Psychol. 2020-10-2
Psychol Sci. 2020-9-11