• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

雅培 ID NOW 在有症状的 COVID-19 确诊患者中的可接受性能。

Acceptable performance of the Abbott ID NOW among symptomatic individuals with confirmed COVID-19.

机构信息

Public Health Laboratory, Alberta Precision Laboratories, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Med Microbiol. 2021 Jul;70(7). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001372.

DOI:10.1099/jmm.0.001372
PMID:34309503
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8493423/
Abstract

The ID NOW is FDA approved for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic individuals within the first 7 days of symptom onset for COVID-19 if tested within 1 h of specimen collection. Clinical data on the performance of the ID NOW are limited, with many studies varying in their study design and/or having small sample size. In this study we aimed to determine the clinical performance of the ID NOW compared to conventional RT-PCR testing. Adults with COVID-19 in the community or hospital were recruited into the study. Paired throat swabs were collected, with one throat swab transported immediately in an empty sterile tube to the laboratory for ID NOW testing, and the other transported in universal transport media and tested by an in-house SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay targeting the E gene. In total, 133 individuals were included in the study; 129 samples were positive on either the ID NOW and/or RT-PCR. Assuming any positive result on either assay represents a true positive, positive per cent agreement (PPA) of the ID NOW compared to RT-PCR with 95 % confidence intervals was 89.1 % (82.0-94.1%) and 91.6 % (85.1-95.9%), respectively. When analysing individuals with symptom duration ≤7 days and who had the ID NOW performed within 1 h (=62), ID NOW PPA increased to 98.2 %. Results from the ID NOW were reliable, especially when adhering to the manufacturer's recommendations for testing.

摘要

ID NOW 已获得美国食品药品监督管理局 (FDA) 的批准,可用于检测 COVID-19 症状出现后 7 天内的有症状个体,如果在标本采集后 1 小时内进行检测。目前关于 ID NOW 性能的临床数据有限,许多研究在研究设计和/或样本量方面存在差异。在这项研究中,我们旨在确定 ID NOW 与常规 RT-PCR 检测相比的临床性能。我们招募了社区或医院中的 COVID-19 成年患者参与研究。采集配对的咽喉拭子,其中一个咽喉拭子立即用空无菌管运送到实验室进行 ID NOW 检测,另一个用通用运输介质运送,并通过针对 E 基因的内部 SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR 检测进行检测。共有 133 人纳入研究;129 个样本在 ID NOW 和/或 RT-PCR 上均为阳性。假设任何一种检测方法的阳性结果都代表真阳性,那么与 RT-PCR 相比,ID NOW 的阳性百分比一致性(PPA)在 95%置信区间内分别为 89.1%(82.0-94.1%)和 91.6%(85.1-95.9%)。当分析症状持续时间≤7 天且 ID NOW 在 1 小时内(=62)进行的个体时,ID NOW 的 PPA 增加到 98.2%。ID NOW 的结果是可靠的,尤其是在遵守制造商的测试建议的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/8493423/7c7a523f78cf/jmm-70-1372-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/8493423/7c7a523f78cf/jmm-70-1372-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ab8/8493423/7c7a523f78cf/jmm-70-1372-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Acceptable performance of the Abbott ID NOW among symptomatic individuals with confirmed COVID-19.雅培 ID NOW 在有症状的 COVID-19 确诊患者中的可接受性能。
J Med Microbiol. 2021 Jul;70(7). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001372.
2
Performance of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Using Nasopharyngeal Swabs Transported in Viral Transport Media and Dry Nasal Swabs in a New York City Academic Institution.雅培 ID Now COVID-19 快速核酸扩增检测试剂使用鼻咽拭子和干鼻拭子在纽约市学术机构中运输的病毒运输介质的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01136-20.
3
Clinical performance of the Abbott Panbio with nasopharyngeal, throat, and saliva swabs among symptomatic individuals with COVID-19.雅培 Panbio 试剂在有症状的 COVID-19 个体的鼻咽、咽喉和唾液拭子中的临床性能。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;40(8):1721-1726. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04202-9. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
4
One swab, two tests: Validation of dual SARS-CoV-2 testing on the Abbott ID NOW™.一拭子,两检测:雅培 ID NOW™ 双重 SARS-CoV-2 检测验证。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Aug;141:104896. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104896. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
5
Evaluation of water gargle samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection using Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 assay.使用雅培 ID NOW COVID-19 检测试剂盒评估用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的漱口样本。
J Med Virol. 2022 Sep;94(9):4522-4527. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27847. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Analytical performance of the Abbott ID NOW 2.0 assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical samples from symptomatic patients.Abbott ID NOW 2.0 检测系统在有症状患者临床样本中检测 SARS-CoV-2 的分析性能。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Mar;108(3):116164. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2023.116164. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Cartridge-Based Abbott ID NOW Test With Probe-Based Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Detection of SARS-CoV-2.基于试剂盒的雅培ID NOW检测与基于探针的实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测法对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)检测的比较评估
Cureus. 2022 Feb 21;14(2):e22470. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22470. eCollection 2022 Feb.
8
Prospective population-level validation of the Abbott ID NOW severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 device implemented in multiple settings for testing asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.在多个环境中对 Abbott ID NOW 严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 设备进行前瞻性人群水平验证,以检测无症状和有症状个体。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Feb;29(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
9
Sensitivity of ID NOW and RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in an ambulatory population.ID NOW 与 RT-PCR 检测门诊人群中 SARS-CoV-2 的敏感性。
Elife. 2021 Apr 20;10:e65726. doi: 10.7554/eLife.65726.
10
Evaluation of the ID NOW among symptomatic individuals during the Omicron wave.在奥密克戎毒株流行期间对有症状个体进行ID NOW检测评估。
J Med Microbiol. 2023 Feb;72(2). doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.001669.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-market surveillance of six COVID-19 point-of-care tests using pre-Omicron and Omicron SARS-CoV-2 variants.使用 Omicron 变异株之前和 Omicron 变异株对六种 COVID-19 即时检测进行上市后监测。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0016324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00163-24. Epub 2024 May 17.
2
Diagnostics and analysis of SARS-CoV-2: current status, recent advances, challenges and perspectives.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的诊断与分析:现状、最新进展、挑战与展望
Chem Sci. 2023 May 3;14(23):6149-6206. doi: 10.1039/d2sc06665c. eCollection 2023 Jun 14.
3
Utilization of rapid antigen tests for screening SARS-CoV-2 prior to dental treatment.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of abbott ID NOW COVID-19 rapid molecular assay to cepheid xpert xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay in dry nasal swabs.雅培ID NOW新型冠状病毒肺炎快速分子检测法与赛沛Xpert Xpress新型冠状病毒检测法在干燥鼻拭子中的比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Apr;99(4):115208. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115208. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
2
A Comparison of Five SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Assays With Clinical Correlations.五种 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测方法与临床相关性比较。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Jan 4;155(1):69-78. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa181.
3
Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type.
在牙科治疗前使用快速抗原检测筛查严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)。
Front Oral Health. 2022 Oct 4;3:930625. doi: 10.3389/froh.2022.930625. eCollection 2022.
4
Prospective population-level validation of the Abbott ID NOW severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 device implemented in multiple settings for testing asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.在多个环境中对 Abbott ID NOW 严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 设备进行前瞻性人群水平验证,以检测无症状和有症状个体。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2023 Feb;29(2):247-252. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.08.025. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
5
Avoiding False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test Results with Point-of-Care Molecular Testing on Residual Test Buffer.利用即时分子检测技术对残余检测缓冲液进行检测,避免 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测出现假阳性结果。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Aug 31;10(4):e0063922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00639-22. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
6
FDA authorized molecular point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 tests: A critical review on principles, systems and clinical performances.美国食品药品监督管理局批准的分子即时检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2检测:对原理、系统和临床性能的批判性综述。
Biosens Bioelectron X. 2022 Sep;11:100158. doi: 10.1016/j.biosx.2022.100158. Epub 2022 May 21.
7
Evaluating the Ability to ID (COVID-19) NOW: a Large Real-World Prospective Evaluation of the Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 Assay.评估当前识别(COVID-19)的能力:雅培 ID NOW COVID-19 检测的大型真实世界前瞻性评估。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Jun 29;10(3):e0051322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00513-22. Epub 2022 May 17.
8
Evaluation of water gargle samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection using Abbott ID NOW COVID-19 assay.使用雅培 ID NOW COVID-19 检测试剂盒评估用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的漱口样本。
J Med Virol. 2022 Sep;94(9):4522-4527. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27847. Epub 2022 May 18.
9
Diagnostic accuracy of the Abbott ID NOW SARS-CoV-2 rapid test for the triage of acute medical admissions.雅培 ID NOW SARS-CoV-2 快速检测用于急性住院患者分诊的诊断准确性。
J Hosp Infect. 2022 May;123:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.02.010. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
10
SARS-CoV-2 microfluidic antigen point-of-care testing in Emergency Room patients during COVID-19 pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 微流控抗原即时检测在 COVID-19 大流行期间急诊科患者中的应用。
J Virol Methods. 2022 Jan;299:114337. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2021.114337. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
四项 SARS-CoV-2 核酸扩增检测(NAAT)平台的比较研究表明,ID NOW 平台的性能受到患者和标本类型的显著影响。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;99(1):115200. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115200. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
How many are we missing with ID NOW COVID-19 assay using direct nasopharyngeal swabs? Findings from a mid-sized academic hospital clinical microbiology laboratory.使用直接鼻咽拭子的 ID NOW COVID-19 检测我们漏检了多少人?来自一家中型学术医院临床微生物学实验室的发现。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;98(2):115123. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2020.115123. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
5
Direct Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Analytical Limits of Detection across Seven Molecular Assays.七种分子检测方法对 SARS-CoV-2 分析检测限的直接比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Aug 24;58(9). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01535-20.
6
Commercial Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Molecular Assays: Superior Analytical Sensitivity of cobas SARS-CoV-2 Relative to NxTAG CoV Extended Panel and ID NOW COVID-19 Test.商业用严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)分子检测:与 NxTAG CoV 扩展面板和 ID NOW COVID-19 测试相比, cobas SARS-CoV-2 的分析灵敏度更高。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;144(11):1303-1310. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0283-SA.
7
Comparing Nasopharyngeal and Midturbinate Nasal Swab Testing for the Identification of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.比较鼻咽和中鼻甲鼻拭子检测在鉴定严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 中的作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Apr 8;72(7):1253-1255. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa882.
8
Performance of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 Rapid Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Using Nasopharyngeal Swabs Transported in Viral Transport Media and Dry Nasal Swabs in a New York City Academic Institution.雅培 ID Now COVID-19 快速核酸扩增检测试剂使用鼻咽拭子和干鼻拭子在纽约市学术机构中运输的病毒运输介质的性能。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01136-20.
9
Clinical Evaluation and Utilization of Multiple Molecular In Vitro Diagnostic Assays for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.用于 SARS-CoV-2 检测的多种分子体外诊断检测方法的临床评估和应用。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Jul 7;154(2):201-207. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa097.
10
Comparison of Two Commercial Molecular Tests and a Laboratory-Developed Modification of the CDC 2019-nCoV Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.两种商业分子检测方法与一种实验室开发的对疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)2019新型冠状病毒逆转录聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测法的改良方法用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的比较
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00938-20.