• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对英语水平有限的患者的健康社会决定因素进行检查。

Examination of social determinants of health among patients with limited English proficiency.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 500 Hofstra Blvd, Hempstead, NY, 11549, USA.

Institute of Health Innovations and Outcomes Research, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, 600 Community Drive Suite 403, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2021 Aug 5;14(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05720-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-021-05720-7
PMID:34353369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8340469/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence of social needs by English proficiency using data from Northwell Health's social determinants of health screening program. The screening program evaluates 12 domains of social needs: material need, employment, medical-legal assistance, health insurance, public benefits, health literacy, transportation, medical care, utilities, housing quality, food security, and housing insecurity. We have identified patients to have limited English proficiency if they have selected a language other than English as their primary language.

RESULTS

The study population includes 92,958 individuals; of these, 83,445 (89.8%) patients are English proficient, and 9513 (10.2%) patients have limited English proficiency. A higher percentage of patients with limited English proficiency has social needs, including material need, employment, medical-legal assistance, health insurance, public benefit, health literacy, medical care, utility bill, poor housing quality, and food insecurity (all p-values < 0.05). In multivariable logistic regression models adjusting for sociodemographic information, LEP status (odds ratio = 1.36 [1.25-1.49]) has been associated with having social needs. These findings suggest that system-wide SDH screening and referral programs should identify ways to ensure capturing social needs among patients with limited English proficiency.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在利用 Northwell Health 的健康决定因素社会评估计划的数据,通过英语熟练程度来考察社会需求的普遍性。该评估计划评估了 12 个社会需求领域:物质需求、就业、医疗法律援助、医疗保险、公共福利、健康素养、交通、医疗保健、水电费、住房质量、食品安全和住房不安全。如果患者选择英语以外的语言作为其主要语言,则认为其英语水平有限。

结果

本研究人群包括 92958 人;其中,83445 名(89.8%)患者英语熟练,9513 名(10.2%)患者英语水平有限。英语水平有限的患者更有可能存在社会需求,包括物质需求、就业、医疗法律援助、医疗保险、公共福利、健康素养、医疗保健、水电费、住房质量差和食品安全问题(均 p 值<0.05)。在调整社会人口统计学信息的多变量逻辑回归模型中,英语水平有限的状态(比值比=1.36 [1.25-1.49])与存在社会需求相关。这些发现表明,全系统的 SDH 筛查和转介计划应确定如何确保为英语水平有限的患者捕捉社会需求的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ed/8340469/df9a5fd58cbe/13104_2021_5720_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ed/8340469/df9a5fd58cbe/13104_2021_5720_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/88ed/8340469/df9a5fd58cbe/13104_2021_5720_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Examination of social determinants of health among patients with limited English proficiency.对英语水平有限的患者的健康社会决定因素进行检查。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Aug 5;14(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05720-7.
2
Engagement With a Health Information Technology-Augmented Self-Management Support Program in a Population With Limited English Proficiency: Observational Study.在英语水平有限的人群中使用健康信息技术增强的自我管理支持计划进行互动:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 11;9(5):e24520. doi: 10.2196/24520.
3
Limited english proficiency, primary language at home, and disparities in children's health care: how language barriers are measured matters.英语水平有限、母语非英语以及儿童医疗保健方面的差异:语言障碍的衡量方式很重要。
Public Health Rep. 2005 Jul-Aug;120(4):418-30. doi: 10.1177/003335490512000409.
4
Disparities in Health Insurance Coverage and Access to Care by English Language Proficiency in the USA, 2006-2016.2006 - 2016年美国按英语语言能力划分的医疗保险覆盖范围和医疗服务可及性差异
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1490-1497. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05609-z. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
5
Patient-Provider Communication Disparities by Limited English Proficiency (LEP): Trends from the US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, 2006-2015.患者-提供者沟通的英语能力不足差距(LEP):来自美国医疗支出面板调查的趋势,2006-2015。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Aug;34(8):1434-1440. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4757-3. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
6
Disparities in Hypertension Associated with Limited English Proficiency.与英语水平有限相关的高血压差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jun;32(6):632-639. doi: 10.1007/s11606-017-3999-9. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
7
Participation of Patients With Limited English Proficiency in Gynecologic Oncology Clinical Trials.医学学术文献:《低英语水平患者参与妇科肿瘤临床试验》
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2023 Jan;21(1):27-32.e2. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7068.
8
Specialty Care Utilization Among Adults with Limited English Proficiency.成人有限英语能力者的专业护理利用情况。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4130-4136. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07477-6. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
9
Association of Patient and Family Reports of Hospital Safety Climate With Language Proficiency in the US.患者和家属对美国医院安全氛围的报告与语言熟练程度的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Aug 1;176(8):776-786. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.1831.
10
Disparities In Telehealth Use Among California Patients With Limited English Proficiency.加利福尼亚州英语能力有限的患者在远程医疗使用方面的差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Mar;40(3):487-495. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00823.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Healthy Habits in Well-Child Visits: Advancing Weight-Neutral Health Promotion in Diverse Pediatric Populations.在儿童健康检查中促进健康习惯:在不同儿科人群中推进体重中性健康促进
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Aug 26:15598276251370251. doi: 10.1177/15598276251370251.
2
Lost in translation: advancing intervention adaptation for populations with non-dominant language preference in high diversity settings.翻译中的迷失:在高度多样化环境中推进针对非主导语言偏好人群的干预措施适应性调整
Implement Sci Commun. 2025 May 28;6(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00753-6.
3
Culturally Sensitive Treatment of Caregiver Anxiety With Virtual Reality: A Prospective, Pragmatic, Randomized Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative program evaluation of social determinants of health screening and referral program.社会决定因素健康筛查和转介计划的定性方案评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0242964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242964. eCollection 2020.
2
Impact of a Low-Intensity Resource Referral Intervention on Patients' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Use of Community Resources: Results from the CommunityRx Trial.低强度资源转介干预对患者社区资源知识、信念和使用的影响:来自 CommunityRx 试验的结果。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):815-823. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05530-5. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
Community resource referral needs among African American dementia caregivers in an urban community: a qualitative study.
虚拟现实对照顾者焦虑的文化敏感治疗:一项前瞻性、实用性、随机研究。
J Patient Exp. 2025 Mar 25;12:23743735251326671. doi: 10.1177/23743735251326671. eCollection 2025.
4
The Role of Sociodemographic Characteristics and Social Determinants of Health in Influencing the Perceived Quality of Patient-Provider Communication.社会人口学特征和健康的社会决定因素在影响患者与医护人员沟通的感知质量方面的作用。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(3):113. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030113.
5
Social Determinants of Health and Lifetime History of Parent-Reported Concussion in School-Aged Children and Adolescents in the United States.美国学龄儿童和青少年健康的社会决定因素及家长报告的脑震荡终生史
Neurotrauma Rep. 2025 Feb 3;6(1):20-31. doi: 10.1089/neur.2024.0083. eCollection 2025.
6
Bridging language barriers: Access to primary care for Medicaid Managed Care patients with limited English proficiency in three metropolitan areas.跨越语言障碍:为三个大都市地区英语水平有限的医疗补助管理式医疗患者提供初级医疗服务。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Feb 24;3(2):qxaf025. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf025. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Tools to improve discharge equity: Protocol for the pilot TIDE trial.改善出院公平性的工具:TIDE 试验试点方案
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Dec 21;43:101419. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101419. eCollection 2025 Feb.
8
Chatbot for Social Need Screening and Resource Sharing With Vulnerable Families: Iterative Design and Evaluation Study.用于弱势群体家庭社会需求筛查和资源共享的聊天机器人:迭代设计和评估研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Jul 19;11:e57114. doi: 10.2196/57114.
9
Barriers to and opportunities for advancing racial equity in cervical cancer screening in the United States.推进美国宫颈癌筛查中种族公平的障碍和机遇。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):362. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03151-7.
10
Effect of Virtual Versus In Person Interpreting on Diabetes Outcomes in Non-English Language Preference Patients: A Pilot Study.虚拟口译与面对面口译对非英语语言偏好患者糖尿病结局的影响:一项试点研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241240347. doi: 10.1177/21501319241240347.
非裔美国人痴呆症照顾者在城市社区中的社区资源转介需求:一项定性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1341-6.
4
Implementing an EHR-based Screening and Referral System to Address Social Determinants of Health in Primary Care.实施基于电子健康记录的筛查和转介系统,以解决初级保健中的健康社会决定因素。
Med Care. 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S133-S139. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001029.
5
Disparities in Utilization of Social Determinants of Health Referrals Among Children in Immigrant Families.移民家庭儿童健康转诊社会决定因素利用方面的差异。
Front Pediatr. 2018 Jul 24;6:207. doi: 10.3389/fped.2018.00207. eCollection 2018.
6
Targeting Unmet Social Needs-Next Steps Toward Improving Chronic Disease Management.针对未满足的社会需求——改善慢性病管理的下一步措施
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):252-253. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7711.
7
Evaluating Strategies For Reducing Health Disparities By Addressing The Social Determinants Of Health.通过解决健康的社会决定因素来评估减少健康差距的策略。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Aug 1;35(8):1416-23. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1357.
8
The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes.健康的社会决定因素:是时候考虑原因的原因了。
Public Health Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;129 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):19-31. doi: 10.1177/00333549141291S206.
9
Low health literacy, limited English proficiency, and health status in Asians, Latinos, and other racial/ethnic groups in California.加利福尼亚州的亚裔、拉丁裔和其他种族/族裔群体的健康素养低、英语水平有限和健康状况。
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):82-99. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.712621.
10
Professional language interpretation and inpatient length of stay and readmission rates.专业语言翻译与住院时间和再入院率。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Oct;27(10):1294-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2041-5. Epub 2012 Apr 18.