Suppr超能文献

比较两种自动协议在成年期内对海马亚区分割的一致性。

Comparison of Hippocampal Subfield Segmentation Agreement between 2 Automated Protocols across the Adult Life Span.

机构信息

From the Department of Psychiatry (A.S., Z.L., T.H.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.

From the Department of Psychiatry (A.S., Z.L., T.H.), Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri

出版信息

AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Oct;42(10):1783-1789. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7244. Epub 2021 Aug 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The hippocampus is a frequent focus of quantitative neuroimaging research, and structural hippocampal alterations are related to multiple neurocognitive disorders. An increasing number of neuroimaging studies are focusing on hippocampal subfield regional involvement in these disorders using various automated segmentation approaches. Direct comparisons among these approaches are limited. The purpose of this study was to compare the agreement between two automated hippocampal segmentation algorithms in an adult population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We compared the results of 2 automated segmentation algorithms for hippocampal subfields (FreeSurfer v6.0 and volBrain) within a single imaging data set from adults ( = 176, 89 women) across a wide age range (20-79 years). Brain MR imaging was acquired on a single 3T scanner as part of the IXI Brain Development Dataset and included T1- and T2-weighted MR images. We also examined subfield volumetric differences related to age and sex and the impact of different intracranial volume and total hippocampal volume normalization methods.

RESULTS

Estimated intracranial volume and total hippocampal volume of both protocols were strongly correlated ( = 0.93 and 0.9, respectively; both < .001). Hippocampal subfield volumes were correlated (ranging from = 0.42 for the subiculum to = 0.78 for the cornu ammonis [CA]1, all < .001). However, absolute volumes were significantly different between protocols. volBrain produced larger CA1 and CA4-dentate gyrus and smaller CA2-CA3 and subiculum volumes compared with FreeSurfer v6.0. Regional age- and sex-related differences in subfield volumes were qualitatively and quantitatively different depending on segmentation protocol and intracranial volume/total hippocampal volume normalization method.

CONCLUSIONS

The hippocampal subfield volume relationship to demographic factors and disease states should undergo nuanced interpretation, especially when considering different segmentation protocols.

摘要

背景与目的

海马体是定量神经影像学研究的常见焦点,结构海马体的改变与多种神经认知障碍有关。越来越多的神经影像学研究使用各种自动分割方法,关注这些疾病中海马亚区的区域受累情况。这些方法之间的直接比较有限。本研究的目的是比较两种自动海马体分割算法在成人人群中的一致性。

材料与方法

我们比较了两种自动海马亚区分割算法(FreeSurfer v6.0 和 volBrain)在一个成人(年龄范围 20-79 岁,共 176 人,89 名女性)的单一成像数据集内的结果。脑部 MRI 是作为 IXI 脑发育数据集的一部分在单个 3T 扫描仪上获得的,包括 T1 和 T2 加权 MRI 图像。我们还研究了与年龄和性别相关的亚区体积差异,以及不同的颅内体积和总海马体积归一化方法的影响。

结果

两种方案的估计颅内体积和总海马体积均高度相关(r 值分别为 0.93 和 0.9,均<0.001)。海马亚区体积呈正相关(范围从侧脑室的 r = 0.42 到 CA1 的 r = 0.78,均<0.001)。然而,两种方案的绝对体积存在显著差异。与 FreeSurfer v6.0 相比,volBrain 产生的 CA1 和 CA4-齿状回体积较大,而 CA2-CA3 和侧脑室体积较小。基于分割方案和颅内体积/总海马体积归一化方法的不同,亚区体积的年龄和性别相关差异在定性和定量上均有所不同。

结论

在考虑不同分割方案时,特别是在考虑不同的分割方案时,应更细致地解释海马亚区体积与人口统计学因素和疾病状态的关系。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Hippocampal Subfield Segmentation Agreement between 2 Automated Protocols across the Adult Life Span.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Oct;42(10):1783-1789. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7244. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Test-retest reliability of FreeSurfer automated hippocampal subfield segmentation within and across scanners.
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116563. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116563. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
Hippocampal subfield volumes in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;57:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
5
Multi-atlas segmentation of the whole hippocampus and subfields using multiple automatically generated templates.
Neuroimage. 2014 Nov 1;101:494-512. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.054. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
6
Development of a histologically validated segmentation protocol for the hippocampal body.
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:219-232. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
8
Hippocampal subfield analysis in medication-naïve female patients with major depressive disorder.
J Affect Disord. 2016 Apr;194:21-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
9
Automated subfield volumetric analysis of hippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy using high-resolution T2-weighed MR imaging.
Neuroimage Clin. 2016 Jun 13;12:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.06.008. eCollection 2016.
10
Stability of hippocampal subfield volumes after trauma and relationship to development of PTSD symptoms.
Neuroimage. 2021 Aug 1;236:118076. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118076. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective correlation of hippocampal volumes with WADA memory scores in mesial temporal sclerosis patients.
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 24;16:1507846. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1507846. eCollection 2025.
2
Hippocampal Structures Among Japanese Adolescents Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e2355292. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.55292.
3
Age-related differences in hippocampal subfield volumes across the human lifespan: A meta-analysis.
Hippocampus. 2023 Dec;33(12):1292-1315. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23582. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
4
Polygenic score for Alzheimer's disease identifies differential atrophy in hippocampal subfield volumes.
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 13;17(7):e0270795. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270795. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

2
Hippocampal subfield volumetry from structural isotropic 1 mm MRI scans: A note of caution.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Feb 1;42(2):539-550. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25234. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
3
Distinct patterns of hippocampal subfield volume loss in left and right mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
Neurol Sci. 2021 Apr;42(4):1411-1421. doi: 10.1007/s10072-020-04653-6. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
5
Region-specific sex differences in the hippocampus.
Neuroimage. 2020 Jul 15;215:116781. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116781. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
6
Multimodal Hippocampal Subfield Grading For Alzheimer's Disease Classification.
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 25;9(1):13845. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49970-9.
7
Hippocampal subfield volumes in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;57:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
9
HIPS: A new hippocampus subfield segmentation method.
Neuroimage. 2017 Dec;163:286-295. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.049. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
10
volBrain: An Online MRI Brain Volumetry System.
Front Neuroinform. 2016 Jul 27;10:30. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2016.00030. eCollection 2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验