Armauer Hansen Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Aug 6;15(8):e0009593. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009593. eCollection 2021 Aug.
Brucellosis is widespread in Ethiopia with variable reported prevalence depending on the geographical area, husbandry practices and animal species. However, there is limited information on the disease prevalence amongst pastoral communities, whose life is intricately linked with their livestock.
We conducted an integrated human-animal brucellosis sero-surveillance study in two adjacent pastoral regions, Afar and Somali region (SRS). This cross-sectional study included 13 woredas (districts) and 650 households. Blood samples were collected from people and livestock species (cattle, camel, goats and sheep). Sera were analyzed with C-ELISA for camels and shoats (sheep and goats), with I-ELISA for cattle and IgG ELISA for humans. Descriptive and inferential statistics analyses were performed.
A total of 5469 sera were tested by ELISA. Prevalence of livestock was 9.0% in Afar and 8.6% in SRS (ranging from 0.6 to 20.2% at woreda level). In humans, prevalence was 48.3% in Afar and 34.9% in SRS (ranging from 0.0 to 74.5% at woreda level). 68.4% of all households in Afar and 57.5% of households in SRS had at least one animal reactor. Overall, 4.1% of animals had a history of abortion. The proportion of animals with abortion history was higher in seropositive animals than in seronegative animals. Risk factor analysis showed that female animals were significantly at higher risk of being reactors (p = 0.013). Among the species, cattle had the least risk of being reactors (p = 0.014). In humans, there was a clear regional association of disease prevalence (p = 0.002). The older the people, the highest the odds of being seropositive.
Brucellosis is widespread in humans and animals in pastoral communities of Afar and SRS with the existence of geographical hotspots. No clear association was seen between human and particular livestock species prevalence, hence there was no indication as whether B. abortus or B. melitensis are circulating in these areas, which warrants further molecular research prior to embarking on a national control programs. Such programs will need to be tailored to the pastoral context.
布鲁氏菌病在埃塞俄比亚广泛存在,其流行率因地理位置、养殖实践和动物种类而异。然而,关于牧民社区的疾病流行率的信息有限,因为他们的生活与牲畜息息相关。
我们在相邻的两个牧区(阿法尔和索马里地区)进行了一项人-畜布鲁氏菌病血清学监测研究。这项横断面研究包括 13 个沃里达(区)和 650 户家庭。从人和牲畜(牛、骆驼、山羊和绵羊)中采集血样。使用 C-ELISA 检测骆驼和小猪(绵羊和山羊),使用 I-ELISA 检测牛,使用 IgG ELISA 检测人。进行了描述性和推断性统计分析。
共有 5469 份血清通过 ELISA 检测。阿法尔的牲畜流行率为 9.0%,索马里地区为 8.6%(在沃里达一级,范围为 0.6%至 20.2%)。在人类中,阿法尔的流行率为 48.3%,索马里地区为 34.9%(在沃里达一级,范围为 0.0%至 74.5%)。阿法尔的 68.4%家庭和索马里地区的 57.5%家庭至少有一只动物呈反应性。总体而言,4.1%的动物有流产史。流产史动物的阳性率高于无流产史动物。风险因素分析表明,雌性动物发生反应的风险明显更高(p = 0.013)。在各个物种中,牛发生反应的风险最低(p = 0.014)。在人类中,疾病流行率存在明显的区域相关性(p = 0.002)。年龄越大,呈血清阳性的可能性越高。
布鲁氏菌病在阿法尔和索马里地区的牧民社区中广泛存在于人类和动物中,存在地理热点。人类与特定牲畜物种的流行率之间没有明显的关联,因此无法确定 B. abortus 或 B. melitensis 是否在这些地区传播,这需要在开展国家控制项目之前进行进一步的分子研究。此类项目需要根据牧民的具体情况进行调整。