• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼泊尔语版奥斯威斯残疾指数(ODI)对非特异性下腰痛患者的反应性

Responsiveness of Nepali version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on individuals with non-specific low back pain.

作者信息

Binaya Kandel, Kajal Thapa, Ranjeeta Acharya S, Govinda Nepal

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Nepal.

Civil Service Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.

出版信息

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Aug 9;5(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00343-9.

DOI:10.1186/s41687-021-00343-9
PMID:34370146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8353057/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is a common musculoskeletal problem, associated with disability and high societal costs. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is among the most commonly used patient reported outcome measures to measure disability due to LBP. Evidence supporting the reliability and validity of the Nepali Version of Oswestry Disability Index (NODI) exists, but its responsiveness is yet to be assessed.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to assess the responsiveness of NODI in participants with non-specific low back pain.

METHODS

The study included 102 (Male 41, Female 61) participants with non-specific low back pain, attending the physiotherapy outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital and nearby community. The NODI was administered to the patients at baseline and again 2 weeks later along with a 7-item Nepali Version of Global Rating of Change (GROC-NP). Responsiveness of NODI was assessed by plotting Receivers Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

The area under curve (AUC) of NODI was 0.88. The best cut-off point on the NODI for improvement on the GROC-NP or the minimal clinical important change (MIC) was 4.22 and ranged from 3.11 to 6.34. The sensitivity and specificity was 77.4% and 84.2% respectively.

CONCLUSION

NODI is a responsive scale which can discriminate between participants whose level of disability due to LBP is stable or improving. The result for minimal clinically important change, sensitivity and specificity are consistent with other cross culturally adopted versions.

摘要

背景

腰痛(LBP)是一种常见的肌肉骨骼问题,与残疾和高昂的社会成本相关。奥斯维斯特里残疾指数(ODI)是最常用的患者报告结局指标之一,用于衡量因腰痛导致的残疾情况。支持尼泊尔语版奥斯维斯特里残疾指数(NODI)可靠性和有效性的证据已经存在,但其反应度尚未评估。

目的

我们旨在评估NODI在非特异性腰痛患者中的反应度。

方法

该研究纳入了102名(男性41名,女性61名)非特异性腰痛患者,他们来自一家三级医院的理疗门诊及附近社区。在基线时对患者进行NODI评估,2周后再次评估,同时使用7项尼泊尔语版总体变化评定量表(GROC-NP)。通过绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线来评估NODI的反应度。

结果

NODI的曲线下面积(AUC)为0.88。GROC-NP评定为改善或最小临床重要变化(MIC)时,NODI的最佳截断点为4.22,范围在3.11至6.34之间。敏感性和特异性分别为77.4%和84.2%。

结论

NODI是一个有反应度的量表,能够区分因腰痛导致的残疾水平稳定或改善的参与者。最小临床重要变化、敏感性和特异性的结果与其他跨文化采用的版本一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/8353057/06f217d5e9bc/41687_2021_343_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/8353057/06f217d5e9bc/41687_2021_343_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddeb/8353057/06f217d5e9bc/41687_2021_343_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Responsiveness of Nepali version of Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) on individuals with non-specific low back pain.尼泊尔语版奥斯威斯残疾指数(ODI)对非特异性下腰痛患者的反应性
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2021 Aug 9;5(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00343-9.
2
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Nepali versions of numerical pain rating scale and global rating of change.数值疼痛评分量表和变化整体评分的尼泊尔文版本的翻译、跨文化调适和心理计量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Dec 4;15(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0812-8.
3
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients.下腰痛患者疼痛和残疾评定工具的反应度及最小临床重要差异
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Oct 25;7:82. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-82.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Nepali version of the DASH (disability of arm, shoulder and hand) in patients with shoulder pain.尼泊尔语版 DASH(手臂、肩部和手部残疾)在肩部疼痛患者中的跨文化适应性和测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Mar 21;17(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1105-1.
5
Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations.用于腰痛患者的丹麦版奥斯威斯功能障碍指数。第2部分:两个腰痛人群的敏感性、特异性及临床显著改善情况。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1717-28. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0128-6. Epub 2006 May 31.
6
Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Nepali Translation of the Patient-Specific Functional Scale.跨文化调适与尼泊尔文版患者特异性功能量表的验证。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018 Aug;48(8):659-664. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2018.7925. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
7
Responsiveness of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Oswestry Disability Index in subjects with low back pain.巴西葡萄牙语版奥斯维斯特里功能障碍指数在腰痛患者中的反应性
Eur Spine J. 2008 Aug;17(8):1101-6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0690-1. Epub 2008 May 30.
8
Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Hausa Versions of the Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Global Rating of Change Scale in a Low-literate Population With Chronic Low Back Pain.将数字疼痛评分量表和全球变化评分量表的豪萨语版本翻译成低识字率慢性腰痛人群的简体中文,并进行翻译、跨文化适应性和心理测量特性研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020 Apr 15;45(8):E439-E447. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003306.
9
Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations.用于腰痛患者的丹麦版奥斯威斯利功能障碍指数。第1部分:在两个不同人群中的跨文化调适、信度和效度。
Eur Spine J. 2006 Nov;15(11):1705-16. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0117-9. Epub 2006 May 31.
10
Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change for Pain and Disability Outcome Measures in Pregnancy-Related Low Back and Pelvic Girdle Pain.妊娠相关下腰痛和骨盆带疼痛的疼痛和残疾结局测量的反应性和最小重要变化。
Phys Ther. 2019 Nov 25;99(11):1551-1561. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz107.

本文引用的文献

1
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Nepali versions of numerical pain rating scale and global rating of change.数值疼痛评分量表和变化整体评分的尼泊尔文版本的翻译、跨文化调适和心理计量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Dec 4;15(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0812-8.
2
Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.1990 - 2015年全球、区域和国家310种疾病和损伤的发病率、患病率及伤残调整生命年:全球疾病负担研究2015的系统分析
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1545-1602. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31678-6.
3
A Systematic Review of Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Oswestry Disability Index.
Oswestry功能障碍指数跨文化适应性的系统评价
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Dec 15;41(24):E1470-E1478. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001891.
4
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study.全球腰痛负担:来自 2010 年全球疾病负担研究的估计。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):968-74. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
5
Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.2010 年全球疾病负担研究:1990-2010 年 289 种疾病和伤害的 1160 种后遗症导致的残疾生存年数的系统分析。
Lancet. 2012 Dec 15;380(9859):2163-96. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61729-2.
6
A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain.一项关于全球腰痛患病率的系统评价。
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Jun;64(6):2028-37. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
7
Responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire in Italian subjects with sub-acute and chronic low back pain.意大利亚急性和慢性下腰痛患者的 Oswestry 功能障碍指数和 Roland Morris 残疾问卷的反应性。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Jan;21(1):122-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1959-3. Epub 2011 Aug 8.
8
Responsiveness of the Chinese version of the Oswestry disability index in patients with chronic low back pain.中文版 Oswestry 残疾指数在慢性下腰痛患者中的反应性。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):475-81. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1624-2. Epub 2010 Nov 26.
9
The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content.COSMIN 清单用于评估测量特性研究的方法学质量:对其内容的澄清。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010 Mar 18;10:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-22.
10
Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design.整体变化评定量表:优势与劣势综述及设计考量
J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163-70. doi: 10.1179/jmt.2009.17.3.163.