Suppr超能文献

金发姑娘时光:优化儿童的时间利用以促进健康和幸福。

Goldilocks Days: optimising children's time use for health and well-being.

机构信息

Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

J Epidemiol Community Health. 2022 Mar;76(3):301-308. doi: 10.1136/jech-2021-216686. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

One size rarely fits all in population health. Differing outcomes may compete for best allocations of time. Among children aged 11-12 years, we aimed to (1) describe optimal 24-hour time use for diverse physical, cognitive/academic and well-being outcomes, (2) pinpoint the 'Goldilocks Day' that optimises all outcomes and (3) develop a tool to customise time-use recommendations.

METHODS

In 2004, the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children recruited a nationally-representative cohort of 5107 infants with biennial follow-up waves. We used data from the cross-sectional Child Health CheckPoint module (2015-2016, n=1874, 11-12 years, 51% males). Time use was from 7-day 24-hour accelerometry. Outcomes included life satisfaction, psychosocial health, depressive symptoms, emotional problems, non-verbal IQ; vocabulary, academic performance, adiposity, fitness, blood pressure, inflammatory biomarkers, bone strength. Relationships between time use and outcomes were modelled using compositional regression.

RESULTS

Optimal daily durations varied widely for different health outcomes (sleep: 8.3-11.4 hours; sedentary: 7.3-12.2 hours; light physical activity: 1.7-5.1 hours; moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA): 0.3-2.7 hours, all models p≤0.04). In general, days with highest physical activity (predominantly MVPA) and low sedentary time were optimal for physical health, while days with highest sleep and lowest sedentary time were optimal for mental health. Days with highest sedentary time and lowest physical activity were optimal for cognitive health. The overall Goldilocks Day had 10 hours 21 min sleep, 9 hours 44 min sedentary time, 2 hours 26 min light physical activity and 1 hour 29 min MVPA. Our interactive interface allows personalisation of Goldilocks Days to an individual's outcome priorities.

CONCLUSION

'Goldilocks Days' necessitate compromises based on hierarchies of priorities for health, social and economic outcomes.

摘要

背景

在人口健康领域,一刀切的方法并不适用。不同的结果可能会争夺最佳的时间分配。在 11-12 岁的儿童中,我们旨在:(1)描述多样化的身体、认知/学业和幸福感结果的最佳 24 小时时间利用方式;(2)确定优化所有结果的“黄金日”;(3)开发一种定制时间利用建议的工具。

方法

2004 年,澳大利亚儿童纵向研究招募了一个具有全国代表性的婴儿队列,每两年进行一次随访。我们使用横断面儿童健康检查点模块(2015-2016 年,n=1874,11-12 岁,51%为男性)的数据。时间使用来自 7 天 24 小时加速度计。结果包括生活满意度、心理社会健康、抑郁症状、情绪问题、非言语智商;词汇、学业成绩、肥胖、体能、血压、炎症生物标志物、骨强度。使用成分回归模型来研究时间利用与结果之间的关系。

结果

不同健康结果的最佳每日持续时间差异很大(睡眠:8.3-11.4 小时;久坐:7.3-12.2 小时;轻度体力活动:1.7-5.1 小时;中高强度体力活动(MVPA):0.3-2.7 小时,所有模型 p≤0.04)。一般来说,最高体力活动(主要是 MVPA)和最低久坐时间的日子对身体健康是最佳的,而最高睡眠和最低久坐时间的日子对心理健康是最佳的。最高久坐时间和最低体力活动的日子对认知健康是最佳的。整体的“ Goldilocks 日”有 10 小时 21 分钟的睡眠、9 小时 44 分钟的久坐时间、2 小时 26 分钟的轻度体力活动和 1 小时 29 分钟的 MVPA。我们的交互界面允许根据健康、社会和经济结果的优先级对“ Goldilocks 日”进行个性化设置。

结论

“ Goldilocks 日”需要根据健康、社会和经济结果的优先级进行权衡。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验