• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较欧洲在不同时期和空间下的 COVID-19 疫情,使用死亡人数、粗死亡率和调整后的死亡率趋势比。

Comparing the COVID-19 pandemic in space and over time in Europe, using numbers of deaths, crude rates and adjusted mortality trend ratios.

机构信息

University of Groningen, Campus Fryslân, Wirdumerdijk 34, 8911 CE, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 12;11(1):16443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95658-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-95658-4
PMID:34385482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8361083/
Abstract

Comparison of COVID-19 trends in space and over time is essential to monitor the pandemic and to indirectly evaluate non-pharmacological policies aimed at reducing the burden of disease. Given the specific age- and sex- distribution of COVID-19 mortality, the underlying sex- and age-distribution of populations need to be accounted for. The aim of this paper is to present a method for monitoring trends of COVID-19 using adjusted mortality trend ratios (AMTRs). Age- and sex-mortality distribution of a reference European population (N = 14,086) was used to calculate age- and sex-specific mortality rates. These were applied to each country to calculate the expected deaths. Adjusted Mortality Trend Ratios (AMTRs) with 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) were calculated for selected European countries on a daily basis from 17th March 2020 to 29th April 2021 by dividing observed cumulative mortality, by expected mortality, times the crude mortality of the reference population. These estimated the sex- and age-adjusted mortality for COVID-19 per million population in each country. United Kingdom experienced the highest number of COVID-19 related death in Europe. Crude mortality rates were highest Hungary, Czech Republic, and Luxembourg. Accounting for the age-and sex-distribution of the underlying populations with AMTRs for each European country, four different patterns were identified: countries which experienced a two-wave pandemic, countries with almost undetectable first wave, but with either a fast or a slow increase of mortality during the second wave; countries with consistently low rates throughout the period. AMTRs were highest in Eastern European countries (Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland). Our methods allow a fair comparison of mortality in space and over time. These might be of use to indirectly estimating the efficacy of non-pharmacological health policies. The authors urge the World Health Organisation, given the absence of age and sex-specific mortality data for direct standardisation, to adopt this method to estimate the comparative mortality from COVID-19 pandemic worldwide.

摘要

比较空间和时间上的 COVID-19 趋势对于监测大流行以及间接评估旨在减轻疾病负担的非药物政策至关重要。鉴于 COVID-19 死亡率的特定年龄和性别分布,需要考虑人口的潜在性别和年龄分布。本文的目的是提出一种使用调整后的死亡率趋势比 (AMTR) 监测 COVID-19 趋势的方法。使用参考欧洲人口(N=14086)的年龄和性别死亡率分布来计算年龄和性别特异性死亡率。将这些应用于每个国家以计算预期死亡人数。从 2020 年 3 月 17 日至 2021 年 4 月 29 日,每天在选定的欧洲国家计算调整后的死亡率趋势比(AMTR),方法是将观察到的累积死亡率除以预期死亡率,再乘以参考人群的粗死亡率。这估计了每个国家每百万人口的 COVID-19 相关死亡人数。英国是欧洲 COVID-19 相关死亡人数最多的国家。粗死亡率最高的国家是匈牙利、捷克共和国和卢森堡。通过使用 AMTR 为每个欧洲国家的人口分配年龄和性别,确定了四种不同的模式:经历了两波大流行的国家、第一波几乎无法检测到的国家,但在第二波期间死亡率迅速或缓慢增加的国家、整个期间死亡率一直较低的国家。东欧国家(匈牙利、捷克共和国、斯洛伐克和波兰)的 AMTR 最高。我们的方法允许对空间和时间上的死亡率进行公平比较。这些方法可能有助于间接估计非药物卫生政策的效果。作者敦促世界卫生组织,鉴于缺乏直接标准化的年龄和性别特异性死亡率数据,采用这种方法来估计全球 COVID-19 大流行的相对死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb5/8361083/4119148eb3ed/41598_2021_95658_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb5/8361083/e30ee1dfb669/41598_2021_95658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb5/8361083/30a483ca1abe/41598_2021_95658_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb5/8361083/4119148eb3ed/41598_2021_95658_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb5/8361083/e30ee1dfb669/41598_2021_95658_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb5/8361083/30a483ca1abe/41598_2021_95658_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4cb5/8361083/4119148eb3ed/41598_2021_95658_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparing the COVID-19 pandemic in space and over time in Europe, using numbers of deaths, crude rates and adjusted mortality trend ratios.比较欧洲在不同时期和空间下的 COVID-19 疫情,使用死亡人数、粗死亡率和调整后的死亡率趋势比。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 12;11(1):16443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95658-4.
2
Excess deaths associated with covid-19 pandemic in 2020: age and sex disaggregated time series analysis in 29 high income countries.2020 年与新冠大流行相关的超额死亡人数:29 个高收入国家按年龄和性别细分的时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2021 May 19;373:n1137. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1137.
3
[Gender and age factors affecting the mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in Italy].[影响意大利新冠疫情期间死亡率的性别和年龄因素]
Epidemiol Prev. 2020 Sep-Dec;44(5-6 Suppl 2):252-259. doi: 10.19191/EP20.5-6.S2.125.
4
Gender specific excess mortality in Italy during the COVID-19 pandemic accounting for age.意大利在 COVID-19 大流行期间按年龄划分的性别特异性超额死亡率
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Feb;36(2):213-218. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00717-9. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
5
Surveillance of the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Europe: Longitudinal Trend Analyses.欧洲 COVID-19 第二波疫情监测:纵向趋势分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 28;7(4):e25695. doi: 10.2196/25695.
6
COVID-19 second wave mortality in Europe and the United States.欧洲和美国的 COVID-19 第二波死亡人数。
Chaos. 2021 Mar;31(3):031105. doi: 10.1063/5.0041569.
7
Increase in COVID-19 cases and case-fatality and case-recovery rates in Europe: A cross-temporal meta-analysis.欧洲 COVID-19 病例、病死率和治愈率的增加:一项跨时间的荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2020 Sep;92(9):1511-1517. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26035. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Country-level determinants of the severity of the first global wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: an ecological study.国家层面因素对 COVID-19 大流行首个全球浪潮严重程度的影响:一项生态学研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 3;11(2):e042034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042034.
9
A Bayesian spatio-temporal analysis of mortality rates in Spain: application to the COVID-19 2020 outbreak.西班牙死亡率的贝叶斯时空分析:在 2020 年 COVID-19 爆发中的应用。
Popul Health Metr. 2021 May 31;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12963-021-00259-y.
10
Sex-differences in COVID-19 associated excess mortality is not exceptional for the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情相关超额死亡率的性别差异对于新冠大流行来说并非罕见。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20815. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00213-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the experiences of PHC nurses in caring for older patients in the post-fifth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory qualitative study.了解新冠疫情第五波后基层医疗护士护理老年患者的经历:一项探索性定性研究
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 18;12:1340418. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1340418. eCollection 2024.
2
Primary care indicators for disease burden, monitoring and surveillance of COVID-19 in 31 European countries: Eurodata Study.31 个欧洲国家用于 COVID-19 疾病负担监测和监测的初级保健指标:Eurodata 研究。
Eur J Public Health. 2024 Apr 3;34(2):402-410. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad224.
3
Population confidence in the health system in 15 countries: results from the first round of the People's Voice Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of vaccination on new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United Kingdom.疫苗接种对英国新 SARS-CoV-2 感染的影响。
Nat Med. 2021 Aug;27(8):1370-1378. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01410-w. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
2
Who Counts Where? COVID-19 Surveillance in Federal Countries.谁来统计?联邦制国家的 COVID-19 监测
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Dec 1;46(6):959-987. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9349114.
3
The lockdown effect: A counterfactual for Sweden.封锁效应:瑞典的反事实情况。
15 个国家民众对卫生系统的信心:首轮“人民之声”调查结果。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Jan;12(1):e100-e111. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00499-0. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
4
Respective roles of social deprivation, health literacy, and clinical factors for COVID-19: a case-control study in hospitalized patients.社会剥夺、健康素养和临床因素对 COVID-19 的各自作用:一项住院患者的病例对照研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 21;11:1239041. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1239041. eCollection 2023.
5
Impact of COVID-19 on Quality of Life in Long-Term Advanced Rectal Cancer Survivors.新冠疫情对长期晚期直肠癌幸存者生活质量的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 8;11(14):1981. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11141981.
6
Mind the gap: Data availability, accessibility, transparency, and credibility during the COVID-19 pandemic, an international comparative appraisal.注意差距:新冠疫情期间的数据可用性、可获取性、透明度及可信度,一项国际比较评估
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Apr 21;3(4):e0001148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001148. eCollection 2023.
7
Comparing COVID-19 pandemic health responses in two high-income island nations: Iceland and New Zealand.比较两个高收入岛国在 COVID-19 大流行期间的卫生应对措施:冰岛和新西兰。
Scand J Public Health. 2023 Jul;51(5):797-813. doi: 10.1177/14034948221149143. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
8
Identifying age- and sex-specific COVID-19 mortality trends over time in six countries.分析六个国家 COVID-19 死亡率随时间变化的年龄和性别特异性趋势。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Mar;128:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.12.004. Epub 2022 Dec 10.
9
Job satisfaction among healthcare workers in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情后医护人员的工作满意度。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275334. eCollection 2022.
10
A patient with dialysis-dependent acute kidney injury due to hantavirus complicated with SARS-CoV-2 infection.一名因汉坦病毒导致依赖透析的急性肾损伤并合并新型冠状病毒感染的患者。
Clin Nephrol Case Stud. 2022 Aug 4;10:64-70. doi: 10.5414/CNCS110846. eCollection 2022.
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0249732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249732. eCollection 2021.
4
Impact of comorbidity burden on mortality in patients with COVID-19 using the Korean health insurance database.利用韩国健康保险数据库研究合并症负担对 COVID-19 患者死亡率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 18;11(1):6375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85813-2.
5
Beyond deaths per capita: comparative COVID-19 mortality indicators.超越人均死亡数:比较 COVID-19 死亡率指标。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 10;11(3):e042934. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042934.
6
Real-time prediction of COVID-19 related mortality using electronic health records.利用电子健康记录实时预测 COVID-19 相关死亡率。
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 16;12(1):1058. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20816-7.
7
COVID-19 in the Middle East and North Africa region: an urgent call for reliable, disaggregated and openly shared data.中东和北非地区的2019冠状病毒病:紧急呼吁提供可靠、分类且公开共享的数据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Feb;6(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005175.
8
COVID-19 data gaps and lack of transparency undermine pandemic response.新冠疫情数据缺口和缺乏透明度破坏了疫情应对工作。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2021 Jun 7;43(2):e307-e308. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab016.
9
Explaining covid-19 performance: what factors might predict national responses?解释新冠疫情表现:哪些因素可能预测各国的应对措施?
BMJ. 2021 Jan 28;372:n91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n91.
10
COVID-19 Surveillance Data: A Primer for Epidemiology and Data Science.新冠病毒疾病监测数据:流行病学与数据科学入门
Am J Public Health. 2021 Apr;111(4):614-619. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2020.306088. Epub 2021 Jan 21.