Suppr超能文献

常用性能测试与老年人跌倒史的可靠性和诊断准确性:系统评价。

Reliability and Diagnostic Accuracy of Commonly Used Performance Tests Relative to Fall History in Older Persons: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.

Department of Epidemiology, Research Line Functioning, Participation and Rehabilitation, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2021 Aug 28;16:1591-1616. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S322506. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Early detection of fall risk is crucial for targeted fall prevention and rehabilitation. This systematic review facilitates decision-making concerning the optimal choice for a suitable fall risk assessment test for older persons in four different settings. This systematic review provides an overview of reliability and diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity [SE], specificity, likelihood ratios, and post-test probabilities) of commonly used performance measures to assess older persons' fall risk.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts of all articles identified through a systematic search on the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality was critically appraised using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool and the COSMIN risk of bias tool. Due to a setting-dependent fall risk, four relevant settings were selected for the analyses: 1) community dwelling, 2) nursing home, 3) hospital, and 4) the combined setting of hospitalized and community-dwelling persons.

RESULTS

Recommendations for diagnostic accuracy can be made for the specific settings: setting 1) mini-balance evaluation system test, timed up and go test with fast speed (TUG FAST), cognitive TUG FAST, functional reach test, and fast gait speed; 2) TUG at usual speed; 3) none of the included tests; and 4) some hip muscle strength and hand grip strength tests might be recommended.

CONCLUSION

The review's results are applicable for use in clinical practice, both on a population and on an individual level for patients and caregivers. Most measures' reliability is sufficient. However, the included tests' discriminative ability is not optimal for clinical use in relevant settings. The low sample sizes of most of the included studies and a limited amount of studies in all but the community-dwelling setting hinder us from making strong recommendations.

摘要

背景/目的:早期发现跌倒风险对于有针对性的跌倒预防和康复至关重要。本系统评价有助于针对以下四个不同环境中老年人的合适跌倒风险评估测试做出最佳选择:1)社区居住环境,2)疗养院,3)医院,4)住院和社区居住人员的综合环境。本系统评价概述了常用性能指标评估老年人跌倒风险的可靠性和诊断准确性(敏感度[SE]、特异性、似然比和后验概率)。

方法

两位评审员独立筛选了通过系统搜索在 PubMed、Embase、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 数据库中识别出的所有文章的标题、摘要和全文。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2 工具和 COSMIN 偏倚风险工具对方法学质量进行了批判性评估。由于存在依赖于环境的跌倒风险,因此选择了四个相关环境进行分析:1)社区居住环境,2)疗养院,3)医院,4)住院和社区居住人员的综合环境。

结果

可以为特定环境提供诊断准确性建议:1)环境 1)迷你平衡评估系统测试、快速计时起身行走测试(TUG FAST)、认知 TUG FAST、功能性伸手测试和快速步速;2)TUG 正常速度;3)无纳入测试;4)一些臀肌力量和握力测试可能被推荐。

结论

本综述的结果可应用于临床实践,无论是在人群层面还是在个体层面,适用于患者和护理人员。大多数测试的可靠性是足够的。然而,纳入测试的区分能力在相关环境中并不适合临床使用。大多数研究的样本量较小,而且除了社区居住环境之外,所有研究的数量都有限,这使得我们无法做出强有力的建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c18f/8409789/34ecd0c26e14/CIA-16-1591-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验