• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于种族表型的内隐态度的特异性和增量预测效度研究。

Specificity and incremental predictive validity of implicit attitudes: studies of a race-based phenotype.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Sep 6;6(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00324-y.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-021-00324-y
PMID:34487286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8421490/
Abstract

Four studies involving 2552 White American participants were conducted to investigate bias based on the race-based phenotype of hair texture. Specifically, we probed the existence and magnitude of bias in favor of Eurocentric (straight) over Afrocentric (curly) hair and its specificity in predicting responses to a legal decision involving the phenotype. Study 1 revealed an implicit preference, measured by an Implicit Association Test (IAT), favoring Eurocentric over Afrocentric hair texture among White Americans. This effect was not reducible to a Black/White implicit race attitude nor to mere perceptual preference favoring straight over curly hair. In Study 2, the phenotype (hair) IAT significantly and uniquely predicted expressions of support in response to an actual legal case that involved discrimination on the basis of Afrocentric hair texture. Beyond replicating this result, Studies 3 and 4 (the latter preregistered) provided further, and even more stringent, evidence for incremental predictive validity: in both studies, the phenotype IAT was associated with support for a Black plaintiff above and beyond the effects of two parallel explicit scales and, additionally, a race attitude IAT. Overall, these studies support the idea that race bias may be uniquely detected by examining implicit attitudes elicited by group-based phenotypicality, such as hair texture. Moreover, the present results inform theoretical investigations of the correspondence principle in the context of implicit social cognition: they suggest that tailoring IATs to index specific aspects of an attitude object (e.g., by decomposition of phenotypes) can improve prediction of intergroup behavior.

摘要

四项研究共涉及 2552 名美国白人参与者,旨在调查基于头发纹理的种族表型的偏见。具体来说,我们探究了偏向欧美人种(直发)而非非裔美国人种(卷发)的偏见的存在和程度,以及其在预测涉及表型的法律决策反应中的特异性。研究 1 通过内隐联想测验(IAT)揭示了一种隐含偏好,即白人美国人倾向于欧美人种的头发纹理,而不是非裔美国人种的头发纹理。这种效应不能简化为黑人/白人的隐性种族态度,也不能简化为仅仅是偏好直发而不是卷发的感知偏好。在研究 2 中,表型(头发)IAT 显著且独特地预测了对实际法律案件的支持表达,该案件涉及基于非裔美国人种头发纹理的歧视。除了复制这一结果外,研究 3 和 4(后者预先注册)提供了进一步、甚至更严格的增量预测有效性证据:在这两项研究中,表型 IAT 与对黑人原告的支持相关,超越了两个平行的显式量表和种族态度 IAT 的影响。总的来说,这些研究支持了这样一种观点,即通过检查基于群体表型的隐含态度,可以独特地检测出种族偏见。此外,目前的结果为隐性社会认知背景下的对应原则的理论研究提供了信息:它们表明,通过分解表型等方式,使 IAT 适应于指数态度对象的特定方面,可以提高对群体间行为的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7600/8421490/6f04099eb899/41235_2021_324_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7600/8421490/58ced5c9aa1c/41235_2021_324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7600/8421490/85562395e67d/41235_2021_324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7600/8421490/6f04099eb899/41235_2021_324_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7600/8421490/58ced5c9aa1c/41235_2021_324_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7600/8421490/85562395e67d/41235_2021_324_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7600/8421490/6f04099eb899/41235_2021_324_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Specificity and incremental predictive validity of implicit attitudes: studies of a race-based phenotype.基于种族表型的内隐态度的特异性和增量预测效度研究。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Sep 6;6(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00324-y.
2
Unconscious Race and Class Biases among Registered Nurses: Vignette-Based Study Using Implicit Association Testing.注册护士中无意识的种族和阶级偏见:基于 vignette 的内隐联想测验研究
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jun;220(6):1077-1086.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.065. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
3
Implicit bias among physicians and its prediction of thrombolysis decisions for black and white patients.医生的隐性偏见及其对黑人和白人患者溶栓决策的预测。
J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Sep;22(9):1231-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
4
Invalid Claims About the Validity of Implicit Association Tests by Prisoners of the Implicit Social-Cognition Paradigm.囚犯的内隐社会认知范式对内隐联想测验有效性的无效主张。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):435-442. doi: 10.1177/1745691621991860.
5
Relationships between the race implicit association test and other measures of implicit and explicit social cognition.种族内隐联想测验与其他内隐和外显社会认知测量方法之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 27;14:1197298. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197298. eCollection 2023.
6
Using Implicit Measures of Discrimination: White, Black, and Hispanic Participants Respond Differently to Group-Specific Racial/Ethnic Categories vs. the General Category "People of Color" in the USA.使用隐性歧视测量法:美国的白种人、黑种人和西班牙裔参与者对特定种族/族裔群体类别(如“白人”、“黑人”和“西班牙裔”)与通用类别“有色人种”(People of Color)的反应不同。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Aug;10(4):1682-1692. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01353-z. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
7
The target/perpetrator brief-implicit association test (B-IAT): an implicit instrument for efficiently measuring discrimination based on race/ethnicity, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, weight, and age.目标/犯罪者简要内隐联想测验(B-IAT):一种基于种族/民族、性别、性别认同、性取向、体重和年龄进行歧视的高效测量的内隐工具。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 19;21(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10171-7.
8
Decoupling the Conflicting Evaluative Meanings in Automatically Activated Race-Based Associations.自动激活的基于种族的联想中冲突的评价意义的解耦。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jul;50(7):987-1005. doi: 10.1177/01461672231156029. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
9
Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: a meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies.预测种族和民族歧视:内隐联想测验标准研究的元分析。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Aug;105(2):171-92. doi: 10.1037/a0032734. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
10
Preference for high status predicts implicit outgroup bias among children from low-status groups.高社会地位的偏好预示着低社会地位群体儿童的内隐外群体偏见。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Apr;50(4):1081-90. doi: 10.1037/a0035054. Epub 2013 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Investigation of the Predictive Validity of Four Indirect Measures of Bias and Prejudice.四种间接偏见和歧视测量方法的预测有效性比较研究。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2024 Jun;50(6):871-888. doi: 10.1177/01461672221150229. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Systemic racism: individuals and interactions, institutions and society.系统性种族主义:个体与互动、制度与社会。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Dec 20;6(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00349-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The primacy of behavioral research for understanding the brain.理解大脑,行为研究为首。
Behav Neurosci. 2021 Oct;135(5):601-609. doi: 10.1037/bne0000471. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
2
The good and the bad: Are some attribute words better than others in the Implicit Association Test?好与坏:在内隐联想测验中,某些属性词是否比其他词更具优势?
Behav Res Methods. 2021 Dec;53(6):2512-2527. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01592-8. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
The Bidirectional Causal Relation Between Implicit Stereotypes and Implicit Prejudice.内隐刻板印象和内隐偏见之间的双向因果关系。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2020 Sep;46(9):1318-1330. doi: 10.1177/0146167219899234. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
4
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile.预先注册很难,但很有价值。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Oct;23(10):815-818. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
5
Implicit Bias Is Behavior: A Functional-Cognitive Perspective on Implicit Bias.内隐偏见即行为:内隐偏见的功能认知透视。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep;14(5):835-840. doi: 10.1177/1745691619855638. Epub 2019 Aug 2.
6
Establishing construct validity evidence for regional measures of explicit and implicit racial bias.建立区域明确和隐性种族偏见的结构有效性证据。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jun;148(6):1022-1040. doi: 10.1037/xge0000623.
7
Sexual Selection, Agonistic Signaling, and the Effect of Beards on Recognition of Men's Anger Displays.性选择、竞争信号与胡须对男性愤怒展示识别的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2019 May;30(5):728-738. doi: 10.1177/0956797619834876. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
8
The relationship between implicit intergroup attitudes and beliefs.内隐群体态度与信念之间的关系。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Mar 26;116(13):5862-5871. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820240116. Epub 2019 Mar 4.
9
Patterns of Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: I. Long-Term Change and Stability From 2007 to 2016.内隐和外显态度模式:I. 2007 年至 2016 年的长期变化和稳定性。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Feb;30(2):174-192. doi: 10.1177/0956797618813087. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
10
Relationship between the Implicit Association Test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis.内隐联想测验与群际行为的关系:一项元分析。
Am Psychol. 2019 Jul-Aug;74(5):569-586. doi: 10.1037/amp0000364. Epub 2018 Dec 13.