• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不受随机性影响:随机临床试验中的混杂和选择偏倚。

Impervious to Randomness: Confounding and Selection Biases in Randomized Clinical Trials.

机构信息

Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Invest. 2021 Nov;39(10):783-788. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2021.1974030. Epub 2021 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1080/07357907.2021.1974030
PMID:34514927
Abstract

The random allocation of therapies in randomized clinical trials is a powerful tool that removes all confounding biases that can affect treatment assignment. However, confounders influencing mediators of the treatment effect are unaffected by randomization and should be considered during trial design and statistical modeling.Examples of such mediators include biomarkers predictive of response to targeted therapies in oncology. Patient selection for such biomarkers is prudent in clinical trials. Conversely, prognostic information on outcome heterogeneity can be derived from observational datasets that include more representative populations. The fusion of experimental and observational data can then allow patient-specific inferences.

摘要

在随机临床试验中,治疗方法的随机分配是一种强大的工具,它可以消除所有可能影响治疗分配的混杂偏差。然而,影响治疗效果中介因素的混杂因素不受随机化的影响,在试验设计和统计建模时应加以考虑。这类中介因素的例子包括肿瘤学中预测靶向治疗反应的生物标志物。在临床试验中,对这类生物标志物进行患者选择是谨慎的。相反,来自包括更具代表性人群的观察性数据集的预后信息可以用来推断结果的异质性。然后,实验数据和观察数据的融合可以允许进行基于患者个体的推断。

相似文献

1
Impervious to Randomness: Confounding and Selection Biases in Randomized Clinical Trials.不受随机性影响:随机临床试验中的混杂和选择偏倚。
Cancer Invest. 2021 Nov;39(10):783-788. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2021.1974030. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
2
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.与标准护理相比,自动监测用于危重症患者脓毒症的早期检测
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2.
3
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
4
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
5
Assessing the comparative effects of interventions in COPD: a tutorial on network meta-analysis for clinicians.评估慢性阻塞性肺疾病干预措施的比较效果:面向临床医生的网状Meta分析教程
Respir Res. 2024 Dec 21;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-03056-x.
6
Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials.随机化以防止医疗保健试验中的选择偏倚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18(2):MR000012. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000012.pub2.
7
Surgery for epilepsy.癫痫手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD010541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010541.pub2.
8
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Herbal and dietary therapies for primary and secondary dysmenorrhoea.原发性和继发性痛经的草药及饮食疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD002124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002124.

引用本文的文献

1
Let It Breathe: Mastering Spontaneous Breathing Trials.让其自主呼吸:掌握自主呼吸试验
Respir Care. 2024 Nov 18;69(12):1617. doi: 10.4187/respcare.12331.
2
Interpreting Randomized Controlled Trials.解读随机对照试验
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 22;15(19):4674. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194674.
3
Obesity and renal cell carcinoma: Biological mechanisms and perspectives.肥胖与肾细胞癌:生物学机制与展望。

本文引用的文献

1
A troubled calculus.
Science. 2021 Jul 23;373(6553):380-383. doi: 10.1126/science.373.6553.380.
2
Making Patient-Specific Treatment Decisions Using Prognostic Variables and Utilities of Clinical Outcomes.利用预后变量和临床结局效用制定个体化治疗决策。
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 1;13(11):2741. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112741.
3
Fusion designs and estimators for treatment effects.融合设计和治疗效果的估计量。
Stat Med. 2021 Jun 15;40(13):3124-3137. doi: 10.1002/sim.8963. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
Semin Cancer Biol. 2023 Sep;94:21-33. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
4
Less is More? First Impressions From COSMIC-313.少即是多?来自COSMIC-313的初步印象
Cancer Invest. 2023 Jan;41(1):101-106. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2136681. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
5
A Causal Framework for Making Individualized Treatment Decisions in Oncology.肿瘤学中做出个体化治疗决策的因果框架。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 14;14(16):3923. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163923.
6
Missing the trees for the forest: most subgroup analyses using forest plots at the ASCO annual meeting are inconclusive.只见树木,不见森林:美国临床肿瘤学会年会上多数使用森林图的亚组分析并无定论。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;14:17588359221103199. doi: 10.1177/17588359221103199. eCollection 2022.
7
The Big Data Paradox in Clinical Practice.临床实践中的大数据悖论。
Cancer Invest. 2022 Aug;40(7):567-576. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2022.2084621. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
8
Fooled by Randomness. The Misleading Effect of Treatment Crossover in Randomized Trials of Therapies with Marginal Treatment Benefit.被随机愚弄。在具有边际治疗效益的治疗方法的随机试验中,治疗交叉的误导性影响。
Cancer Invest. 2022 Feb;40(2):184-188. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2021.2020281. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
9
Causal Considerations Can Inform the Interpretation of Surprising Associations in Medical Registries.因果关系的考虑因素可以为医学注册研究中令人惊讶的关联提供解释。
Cancer Invest. 2022 Jan;40(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2021.1999971. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
4
Randomized  Controlled Trials Versus Real-World Data in the COVID-19 Era: A False Narrative.新冠疫情时代的随机对照试验与真实世界数据:一种错误的说法。
Cancer Invest. 2020 Nov;38(10):537-542. doi: 10.1080/07357907.2020.1841922. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
5
Causal Diagram Techniques for Urologic Oncology Research.泌尿外科肿瘤学研究的因果图技术
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Jun;19(3):271.e1-271.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
6
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations.表皮生长因子受体突变。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 May;30(2):127-136. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.01.008.
7
The Predictive Approaches to Treatment effect Heterogeneity (PATH) Statement.预测治疗效果异质性的方法(PATH)声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Jan 7;172(1):35-45. doi: 10.7326/M18-3667. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
8
Generalizing causal inferences from individuals in randomized trials to all trial-eligible individuals.将随机试验中个体的因果推断推广到所有符合试验条件的个体。
Biometrics. 2019 Jun;75(2):685-694. doi: 10.1111/biom.13009. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
9
Causal inference and the data-fusion problem.因果推断与数据融合问题。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7345-52. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510507113.
10
Enrolling Minority and Underserved Populations in Cancer Clinical Research.让少数族裔和服务不足人群参与癌症临床研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jan;50(1):111-117. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.036. Epub 2015 Oct 21.