Dimakopoulos Vasileios, Mégevand Pierre, Boran Ece, Momjian Shahan, Seeck Margitta, Vulliémoz Serge, Sarnthein Johannes
Klinik für Neurochirurgie, UniversitätsSpital Zürich, Universität Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Département des neurosciences fondamentales, Faculté de médecine, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Brain Commun. 2021 Sep 2;3(3):fcab209. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab209. eCollection 2021.
Interictal high-frequency oscillations are discussed as biomarkers for epileptogenic brain tissue that should be resected in epilepsy surgery to achieve seizure freedom. The prospective classification of tissue sampled by individual electrode contacts remains a challenge. We have developed an automated, prospective definition of clinically relevant high-frequency oscillations in intracranial EEG from Montreal and tested it in recordings from Zurich. We here validated the algorithm on intracranial EEG that was recorded in an independent epilepsy centre so that the analysis was blinded to seizure outcome. We selected consecutive patients who underwent resective epilepsy surgery in Geneva with post-surgical follow-up > 12 months. We analysed long-term recordings during sleep that we segmented into intervals of 5 min. High-frequency oscillations were defined in the ripple (80-250 Hz) and the fast ripple (250-500 Hz) frequency bands. Contacts with the highest rate of ripples co-occurring with fast ripples designated the relevant area. As a validity criterion, we calculated the test-retest reliability of the high-frequency oscillations area between the 5 min intervals (dwell time ≥50%). If the area was not fully resected and the patient suffered from recurrent seizures, this was classified as a true positive prediction. We included recordings from 16 patients (median age 32 years, range 18-53 years) with stereotactic depth electrodes and/or with subdural electrode grids (median follow-up 27 months, range 12-55 months). For each patient, we included several 5 min intervals (median 17 intervals). The relevant area had high test-retest reliability across intervals (median dwell time 95%). In two patients, the test-retest reliability was too low (dwell time < 50%) so that outcome prediction was not possible. The area was fully included in the resected volume in 2/4 patients who achieved post-operative seizure freedom (specificity 50%) and was not fully included in 9/10 patients with recurrent seizures (sensitivity 90%), leading to an accuracy of 79%. An additional exploratory analysis suggested that high-frequency oscillations were associated with interictal epileptic discharges only in channels within the relevant area and not associated in channels outside the area. We thereby validated the automated procedure to delineate the clinically relevant area in each individual patient of an independently recorded dataset and achieved the same good accuracy as in our previous studies. The reproducibility of our results across datasets is promising for a multicentre study to test the clinical application of high-frequency oscillations to guide epilepsy surgery.
发作间期高频振荡被视为癫痫源脑组织的生物标志物,在癫痫手术中应切除该脑组织以实现无癫痫发作。对单个电极触点采集的组织进行前瞻性分类仍然是一项挑战。我们开发了一种自动的、前瞻性的方法来定义来自蒙特利尔的颅内脑电图中临床相关的高频振荡,并在苏黎世的记录中进行了测试。我们在此对在一个独立癫痫中心记录的颅内脑电图上的算法进行了验证,以便分析对癫痫发作结果不知情。我们选择了在日内瓦接受切除性癫痫手术且术后随访超过12个月的连续患者。我们分析了睡眠期间的长期记录,并将其分割为5分钟的时间段。高频振荡在涟漪(80 - 250赫兹)和快速涟漪(250 - 500赫兹)频段中定义。与快速涟漪同时出现的涟漪发生率最高的触点确定了相关区域。作为有效性标准,我们计算了5分钟时间段之间高频振荡区域的重测信度(停留时间≥50%)。如果该区域未被完全切除且患者出现复发性癫痫发作,则将其分类为真阳性预测。我们纳入了16例患者(中位年龄32岁,范围18 - 53岁)的记录,这些患者使用了立体定向深度电极和/或硬膜下电极网格(中位随访27个月,范围12 - 55个月)。对于每位患者,我们纳入了几个5分钟的时间段(中位17个时间段)。相关区域在各时间段之间具有较高的重测信度(中位停留时间95%)。在两名患者中,重测信度过低(停留时间<50%),因此无法进行结果预测。在4例术后实现无癫痫发作的患者中有2例(特异性50%)该区域完全包含在切除体积内,而在10例有复发性癫痫发作的患者中有9例(敏感性90%)该区域未被完全包含,导致准确率为79%。一项额外的探索性分析表明,高频振荡仅与相关区域内通道的发作间期癫痫放电相关,而与该区域外的通道无关。我们由此验证了在独立记录的数据集中描绘每个个体患者临床相关区域的自动化程序,并取得了与我们之前研究相同的良好准确率。我们的结果在不同数据集之间的可重复性对于一项多中心研究很有前景,该研究旨在测试高频振荡在指导癫痫手术中的临床应用。