Department of Community Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 150, place Charles-LeMoyne, Room 200, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Healthcare Management, Sawyer School of Business, Suffolk University, Boston, USA.
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Sep 26;22(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01543-4.
The COVID-19 pandemic has driven primary healthcare (PHC) providers to use telehealth as an alternative to traditional face-to-face consultations. Providing telehealth that meets the needs of patients in a pandemic has presented many challenges for PHC providers. The aim of this study was to describe the positive and negative implications of using telehealth in one Canadian (Quebec) and one American (Massachusetts) PHC setting during the COVID-19 pandemic as reported by physicians.
We conducted 42 individual semi-structured video interviews with physicians in Quebec (N = 20) and Massachusetts (N = 22) in 2020. Topics covered included their practice history, changes brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the advantages and challenges of telehealth. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis was carried out to identify implications of delivering care via telehealth.
Four key themes were identified, each with positive and negative implications: 1) access for patients; 2) efficiency of care delivery; 3) professional impacts; and 4) relational dimensions of care. For patients' access, positive implications referred to increased availability of services; negative implications involved barriers due to difficulties with access to and use of technologies. Positive implications for efficiency were related to improved follow-up care; negative implications involved difficulties in diagnosing in the absence of direct physical examination and non-verbal cues. For professional impacts, positive implications were related to flexibility (teleworking, more availability for patients) and reimbursement, while negative implications were related to technological limitations experienced by both patients and practitioners. For relational dimensions, positive implications included improved communication, as patients were more at ease at home, and the possibility of gathering information from what could be seen of the patient's environment; negative implications were related to concerns around maintaining the therapeutic relationship and changes in patients' engagement and expectations.
Ensuring that health services provision meets patients' needs at all times calls for flexibility in care delivery modalities, role shifting to adapt to virtual care, sustained relationships with patients, and interprofessional collaboration. To succeed, these efforts require guidelines and training, as well as careful attention to technological barriers and interpersonal relationship needs.
COVID-19 大流行促使基层医疗(PHC)提供者将远程医疗作为传统面对面咨询的替代方案。在大流行期间,提供满足患者需求的远程医疗服务给 PHC 提供者带来了许多挑战。本研究的目的是描述在 COVID-19 大流行期间,加拿大(魁北克)和美国(马萨诸塞州)的一名 PHC 医生报告的远程医疗的积极和消极影响。
我们于 2020 年对魁北克(N=20)和马萨诸塞州(N=22)的医生进行了 42 次单独的视频半结构化访谈。主题包括他们的从业历史、COVID-19 大流行带来的变化以及远程医疗的优势和挑战。采用归纳和演绎主题分析方法来确定通过远程医疗提供护理的影响。
确定了四个关键主题,每个主题都有积极和消极的影响:1)患者的可及性;2)护理提供的效率;3)专业影响;4)护理的关系维度。对于患者的可及性,积极影响是指服务的可获得性增加;消极影响是指由于难以获得和使用技术而产生的障碍。效率方面的积极影响与改善的后续护理有关;缺乏直接的体格检查和非语言线索导致诊断困难是消极影响。在专业影响方面,积极影响与灵活性(远程工作,为患者提供更多时间)和报销有关,而消极影响与患者和从业者都经历的技术限制有关。对于关系维度,积极影响包括改善沟通,因为患者在家中感到更自在,并且有可能从患者的环境中收集信息;对维持治疗关系以及患者参与度和期望变化的担忧是消极影响。
为了确保医疗服务的提供始终满足患者的需求,需要在护理提供模式上具有灵活性,适应虚拟护理的角色转变,与患者保持持续的关系,并进行跨专业合作。要取得成功,这些努力需要指导方针和培训,以及对技术障碍和人际关系需求的关注。