• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境干预在大学食堂,重点是决策指导 - 对蔬菜和水果的销售和日常消费的影响。

Environmental Intervention in a University Canteen with Focus on Decision Guidance-Effects on Sale and Daily Consumption of Vegetables and Fruit.

机构信息

Institute of Health Sciences, University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd, Oberbettringer Straße 200, 73525 Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 4;18(19):10443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910443.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph181910443
PMID:34639745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8507895/
Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether an environmental intervention in a university canteen changes the sale and daily consumption of vegetables and fruit among canteen users. The intervention focused on decision guidance, including a positive incentive and nudging. In a pretest-posttest-design, daily sales data of pieces (pcs) of vegetable components and fruit, as well as the sale per main component (pcs/mc), were assessed. Here, 20 opening days were analyzed, each after the intervention (t1) and in the same period of the previous year (t0). Vegetable and fruit consumption were assessed in a controlled pretest-posttest design (3-day-dietary-record, t0 and t1). The intervention group (IG; = 46) visited the canteen ≥ once/week, and the control group (CG; = 49) < once/week. At t1, the sale of absolute vegetable components did not change (t0: 132.3 ± 49.7 pcs, > 0.05), but more per main component were sold at t1 (t0: 0.54 ± 0.09, Δ: 0.09 ± 0.13 pcs/mc, < 0.05). In addition, the sale of fruit (t0: 17.4 ± 11.6, Δ: 8.3 ± 10.8 pcs, < 0.05; t0: 0.07 ± 0.03, Δ: 0.05 ± 0.07 pcs/mc, < 0.001) increased after the intervention. The total consumption of vegetables (IG, t0: 260 ± 170 g/d, CG, t0: 220 ± 156 g/d; > 0.05) and fruit (IG, t0: 191 ± 109 g/d; CG, t0: 186 ± 141 g/d; > 0.05), however, did not change. To effectively change daily consumption, the intervention needs to be expanded.

摘要

本研究旨在评估大学食堂的环境干预是否会改变食堂使用者的蔬菜和水果销售和日常消费。该干预侧重于决策指导,包括积极的激励和推动。在预测试-后测试设计中,评估了蔬菜成分和水果的每日销售件数(pcs),以及每个主要成分的销售件数(pcs/mc)。在这里,分析了 20 个开放日,每个日在干预后(t1)和同年同期(t0)。在对照预测试-后测试设计中(3 天饮食记录,t0 和 t1)评估了蔬菜和水果的消费。干预组(IG; = 46)每周至少访问食堂 1 次,对照组(CG; = 49)<每周 1 次。在 t1 时,绝对蔬菜成分的销售没有变化(t0:132.3 ± 49.7 pcs, > 0.05),但每个主要成分的销售量增加(t0:0.54 ± 0.09,Δ:0.09 ± 0.13 pcs/mc, < 0.05)。此外,水果销售(t0:17.4 ± 11.6,Δ:8.3 ± 10.8 pcs, < 0.05;t0:0.07 ± 0.03,Δ:0.05 ± 0.07 pcs/mc, < 0.001)在干预后增加。蔬菜总摄入量(IG,t0:260 ± 170 g/d;CG,t0:220 ± 156 g/d; > 0.05)和水果总摄入量(IG,t0:191 ± 109 g/d;CG,t0:186 ± 141 g/d; > 0.05)均未改变。为了有效地改变日常消费,需要扩大干预范围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/45bd656a4483/ijerph-18-10443-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/2d7c931c2822/ijerph-18-10443-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/a1a5e709c08e/ijerph-18-10443-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/5311e98c0aa9/ijerph-18-10443-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/ade11fbf81e9/ijerph-18-10443-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/23fa9c2b6015/ijerph-18-10443-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/65e50b077148/ijerph-18-10443-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/45bd656a4483/ijerph-18-10443-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/2d7c931c2822/ijerph-18-10443-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/a1a5e709c08e/ijerph-18-10443-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/5311e98c0aa9/ijerph-18-10443-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/ade11fbf81e9/ijerph-18-10443-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/23fa9c2b6015/ijerph-18-10443-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/65e50b077148/ijerph-18-10443-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4bbc/8507895/45bd656a4483/ijerph-18-10443-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Environmental Intervention in a University Canteen with Focus on Decision Guidance-Effects on Sale and Daily Consumption of Vegetables and Fruit.环境干预在大学食堂,重点是决策指导 - 对蔬菜和水果的销售和日常消费的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 4;18(19):10443. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910443.
2
Availability of free fruits and vegetables at canteen lunch improves lunch and daily nutritional profiles: a randomised controlled trial.食堂午餐提供免费水果和蔬菜可改善午餐及日常营养状况:一项随机对照试验
Br J Nutr. 2009 Oct;102(7):1030-7. doi: 10.1017/S000711450930389X. Epub 2009 Apr 2.
3
Environmental intervention in a university canteen with focus on decision guidance: An evaluation study regarding food consumption, nutrient intake, perception, and satisfaction by canteen users.以决策指导为重点的大学食堂环境干预:一项关于食堂使用者食物消费、营养摄入、认知和满意度的评估研究。
J Public Health Res. 2023 Jun 17;12(2):22799036231181206. doi: 10.1177/22799036231181206. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Long-term sustainability of a worksite canteen intervention of serving more fruit and vegetables.工作场所食堂增加供应水果和蔬菜干预措施的长期可持续性。
Public Health Nutr. 2010 Oct;13(10):1647-52. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010001242. Epub 2010 May 6.
5
Effect of nutrition intervention using a general nutrition course for promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among college students.采用普通营养课程进行营养干预对促进大学生水果和蔬菜消费的影响。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009 Mar-Apr;41(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2008.07.001.
6
The effectiveness of an implementation intentions intervention for fruit and vegetable consumption as moderated by self-schema status.实施意向干预对水果和蔬菜消费的有效性受自我图式状态的调节。
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:228-38. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.07.007. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
7
A workplace feasibility study of the effect of a minimal fruit intervention on fruit intake.工作场所水果干预效果的可行性研究:对水果摄入量的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2011 Aug;14(8):1382-7. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002569. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
8
Meat, fruit, and vegetable consumption in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.撒哈拉以南非洲地区的肉类、水果和蔬菜消费:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
Nutr Rev. 2021 May 12;79(6):651-692. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa032.
9
Fruit and vegetable consumption among Turkish university students.土耳其大学生的水果和蔬菜摄入量。
Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 2004 Sep;74(5):341-8. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831.74.5.341.
10
Testing a Beverage and Fruit/Vegetable Education Intervention in a University Dining Hall.在大学食堂测试一项饮料及水果/蔬菜教育干预措施。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2017 Jun;49(6):457-465.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Nutrition Policy and Individual Struggle to Eat Healthily: The Question of Public Support.营养政策与个人健康饮食的斗争:公共支持的问题。
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 18;12(2):516. doi: 10.3390/nu12020516.
2
Intake of 12 food groups and disability-adjusted life years from coronary heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and colorectal cancer in 16 European countries.16 个欧洲国家 12 种食物组的摄入量与冠心病、中风、2 型糖尿病和结直肠癌的残疾调整生命年
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;34(8):765-775. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00523-4. Epub 2019 Apr 27.
3
Students' adherence to dietary recommendations and their food consumption habits.
学生对饮食建议的遵守情况及其饮食习惯。
Nutr Health. 2018 Jun;24(2):75-81. doi: 10.1177/0260106018772946. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
4
Nudging and social marketing techniques encourage employees to make healthier food choices: a randomized controlled trial in 30 worksite cafeterias in The Netherlands.推动和社会营销技巧鼓励员工做出更健康的食物选择:荷兰 30 家工作场所自助餐厅的随机对照试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb 1;107(2):236-246. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx045.
5
Food groups and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.食物类别与全因死亡率风险:前瞻性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1462-1473. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.117.153148. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
6
Eating out in Spain: Motivations, sociability and consumer contexts.在西班牙外出就餐:动机、社交和消费背景。
Appetite. 2017 Dec 1;119:14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.047. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
7
Meal patterns across ten European countries - results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study.十个欧洲国家的饮食模式——欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC)校准研究的结果
Public Health Nutr. 2016 Oct;19(15):2769-80. doi: 10.1017/S1368980016001142. Epub 2016 May 19.
8
Why Are Some Population Interventions for Diet and Obesity More Equitable and Effective Than Others? The Role of Individual Agency.为什么有些针对饮食和肥胖问题的人群干预措施比其他措施更公平、更有效?个体能动性的作用。
PLoS Med. 2016 Apr 5;13(4):e1001990. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001990. eCollection 2016 Apr.
9
Trends in food consumption and nutrient intake in Germany between 2006 and 2012: results of the German National Nutrition Monitoring (NEMONIT).2006年至2012年德国食物消费与营养摄入趋势:德国国家营养监测(NEMONIT)结果
Br J Nutr. 2016 Apr;115(8):1498-507. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516000544. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
10
Food Environment Interventions to Improve the Dietary Behavior of Young Adults in Tertiary Education Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.改善高等教育环境中年轻人饮食行为的食物环境干预措施:一项系统文献综述
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Oct;115(10):1647-81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.380. Epub 2015 Aug 11.