Haegert D G, Hurd C, Coombs R R
Immunology. 1978 Mar;34(3):533-8.
Comparisons were made between the Direct Antiglobulin Rosetting Reaction (DARR) and Direct Immunofluorescence (DIF) in the detection of surface membrane immunoglobulin of human peripheral lymphocytes. The DARR was more sensitive and the results with this testing procedure (as opposed to those with the DIF) were not influenced by various treatments of the lymphocytes before testing, such as incubation in AB serum at +/- 4 degrees, incubation in serum-free medium at 37 degrees or short exposure to acetate buffer at pH 4.0. Again the DARR (as opposed to the DIF) gave essentially the same results whether the red cell-linked antiglobulin was IgG or the F(ab')2 preparation. With mixed rosetting for both T and SmIg+/- lymphocytes, there was only 1% or less null cells and only 5% or less lymphocytes rosetted with both marker red cells.
对直接抗球蛋白玫瑰花结反应(DARR)和直接免疫荧光法(DIF)检测人外周淋巴细胞表面膜免疫球蛋白的情况进行了比较。DARR更为灵敏,且该检测程序(与DIF相反)的结果不受检测前淋巴细胞的各种处理影响,例如在±4℃的AB血清中孵育、在37℃的无血清培养基中孵育或短时间暴露于pH 4.0的醋酸盐缓冲液中。同样,无论与红细胞相连的抗球蛋白是IgG还是F(ab')2制剂,DARR(与DIF相反)都给出基本相同的结果。对于T淋巴细胞和表面膜免疫球蛋白(SmIg)±淋巴细胞的混合玫瑰花结试验,无效细胞仅占1%或更少,且仅有5%或更少的淋巴细胞与两种标记红细胞形成玫瑰花结。