Li Jian, Ren Yijing, Chen Haiying, Huang Weiyi, Feng Xinyu, Hu Wei
Department of Pathogen Biology, Basic Medical College, Guangxi Traditional Chinese Medical University, Nanning, China.
Department of Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Contemporary Anthropology, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Sep 29;8:696568. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.696568. eCollection 2021.
Previous epidemiological studies have confirmed non-human primates (NHPs) as reservoirs for spp. , , and . It highlights the possibility of interspecies transmission between humans and macaques in laboratory animal facilities. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of pathogenic intestinal protozoan infections in macaques and humans and to determine the risk of cross-species transmission from One Health view. A total of 360 fecal samples, including 310 from the four groups, 25 from the facility workers in a laboratory animal facility, and 25 from the villagers nearby in Yongfu country, southeast China, were collected. Nested PCR assays were done for detecting protozoan pathogens from all the specimens. Furthermore, potential risk factors (gender, age, and direct contact) on the occurrence of intestinal protozoa infection among different sub-groups were evaluated. A phylogenetic and haplotype network analysis was conducted to examine the genetic structure and shared patterns of and . The pathogenic intestinal protozoa were detected in both human and macaque fecal samples. A total of 134 (37.2%) samples were tested positive, which included 113 (36.4%) macaques, 14 (56.0%) facility workers, and 7 (28.0%) villagers, respectively. There was no significant difference in four intestinal protozoa infections between facility workers and villagers (χ = 2.4, > 0.05). However, the positive rate of pathogenic intestinal protozoa in the facility workers, who had direct contact with macaques, was significantly higher [odds ratio (OR) = 0.31, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.09-1.00, < 0.05).Thirty-three genotypes of were identified, including five known genotypes (PigEBITS7, Peru8, Henan V, D, and CM1) and six novel genotypes (MEB1-6). Seven haplotypes were identified in the network analysis from -positive samples. Meanwhile, a phylogenetic and haplotype analysis confirmed the presence of zoonotic subtypes in NHPs and humans. The data collected from this study confirmed a high prevalence of intestinal protozoan infection in humans and macaques. These results warrant workers of such facilities and residents to limit contact with infected animals in order to minimize related health risks. The need for comprehensive strategies to mitigate the risk of zoonotic transmission, especially from a One Health perspective, is recommended.
以往的流行病学研究已证实非人灵长类动物(NHPs)是[具体病原体名称1]、[具体病原体名称2]和[具体病原体名称3]的宿主。这凸显了在实验动物设施中人类与猕猴之间发生种间传播的可能性。本研究旨在调查猕猴和人类中致病性肠道原生动物感染的流行情况,并从“同一健康”视角确定跨物种传播的风险。共收集了360份粪便样本,其中包括来自四个[猕猴群体名称]组的310份样本、来自一家实验动物设施的设施工作人员的25份样本以及来自中国东南部永福县附近村民的25份样本。对所有样本进行巢式PCR检测以检测原生动物病原体。此外,评估了不同亚组中肠道原生动物感染发生的潜在风险因素(性别、年龄和直接接触)。进行了系统发育和单倍型网络分析以研究[具体病原体名称4]和[具体病原体名称5]的遗传结构和共享模式。在人类和猕猴粪便样本中均检测到致病性肠道原生动物。总共134份(37.2%)样本检测呈阳性,其中分别包括113份(36.4%)猕猴样本、14份(56.0%)设施工作人员样本和7份(28.0%)村民样本。设施工作人员和村民在四种肠道原生动物感染方面无显著差异(χ² = 2.4,P > 0.05)。然而,与猕猴有直接接触的设施工作人员中致病性肠道原生动物的阳性率显著更高[优势比(OR)= 0.31,95%置信区间(CI):0.09 - 1.00,P < 0.05]。鉴定出了33种[具体病原体名称6]基因型,包括5种已知基因型(PigEBITS7、Peru8、河南V、D和CM1)和6种新基因型(MEB1 - 6)。在网络分析中从[具体病原体名称7]阳性样本中鉴定出7种单倍型。同时,系统发育和单倍型分析证实了NHPs和人类中存在人畜共患亚型。本研究收集的数据证实了人类和猕猴中肠道原生动物感染的高流行率。这些结果促使此类设施的工作人员和居民限制与感染动物的接触,以尽量减少相关健康风险。建议制定综合策略以降低人畜共患传播风险,特别是从“同一健康”角度。