Suppr超能文献

新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗的黏膜和血清免疫应答。

The Mucosal and Serological Immune Responses to the Novel Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccines.

机构信息

Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR China.

Laboratory for Paediatric Respiratory Research, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, SAR China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2021 Oct 12;12:744887. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.744887. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although the serological antibody responses induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are well characterized, little is known about their ability to elicit mucosal immunity.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to examine and compare the mucosal and systemic responses of recipients of two different vaccination platforms: mRNA (Comirnaty) and inactivated virus (CoronaVac).

METHODS

Serial blood and nasal epithelial lining fluid (NELF) samples were collected from the recipients of either Comirnaty or CoronaVac. The plasma and NELF immunoglobulins A and G (IgA and IgG) specific to SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein (S1) and their neutralization effects were quantified.

RESULTS

Comirnaty induced nasal S1-specific immunoglobulin responses, which were evident as early as 14 ± 2 days after the first dose. In 64% of the subjects, the neutralizing effects of NELF persisted for at least 50 days. Moreover, 85% of Comirnaty recipients exhibited S1-specific IgA and IgG responses in plasma by 14 ± 2 days after the first dose. By 7 ± 2 days after the booster, all plasma samples possessed S1-specific IgA and IgG responses and were neutralizing. The induction of S1-specific plasma antibodies by CoronaVac was IgG dominant, and 83% of the subjects possessed S1-specific IgG by 7 ± 2 days after the booster, with neutralizing effects.

CONCLUSION

Comirnaty induces S1-specific IgA and IgG responses with neutralizing activity in the nasal mucosa; a similar response is not seen with CoronaVac.

CLINICAL IMPLICATION

The presence of a nasal response with mRNA vaccine may provide additional protection compared with inactivated virus vaccine. However, whether such widespread immunological response may produce inadvertent adverse effects in other tissues warrants further investigation.

摘要

背景

尽管 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗诱导的血清抗体反应已得到很好的描述,但对于其诱导黏膜免疫的能力知之甚少。

目的

本研究旨在检查和比较两种不同疫苗接种平台(mRNA[Comirnaty]和灭活病毒[CoronaVac])接种者的黏膜和全身反应。

方法

从接受 Comirnaty 或 CoronaVac 接种的人群中连续采集血清和鼻上皮衬里液(NELF)样本。定量检测针对 SARS-CoV-2 S1 蛋白(S1)的血浆和 NELF 免疫球蛋白 A 和 G(IgA 和 IgG)及其中和效果。

结果

Comirnaty 诱导了鼻黏膜 S1 特异性免疫反应,在第一剂后 14±2 天即可观察到。在 64%的受试者中,NELF 的中和效果至少持续 50 天。此外,在第一剂后 14±2 天,85%的 Comirnaty 接种者的血浆中出现 S1 特异性 IgA 和 IgG 反应。在加强针后 7±2 天,所有血浆样本均具有 S1 特异性 IgA 和 IgG 反应,并具有中和作用。CoronaVac 诱导的 S1 特异性血浆抗体以 IgG 为主,在加强针后 7±2 天,83%的受试者具有 S1 特异性 IgG,具有中和作用。

结论

Comirnaty 在鼻黏膜中诱导具有中和活性的 S1 特异性 IgA 和 IgG 反应;CoronaVac 则没有观察到类似的反应。

临床意义

与灭活病毒疫苗相比,mRNA 疫苗引起的鼻黏膜反应可能提供额外的保护。然而,这种广泛的免疫反应是否可能在其他组织中产生意外的不良反应,还需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70d3/8547269/320d749aa259/fimmu-12-744887-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验