• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用重症监护病房电子病历的考虑时间和输入误差的事件预测模型:回顾性研究

Event Prediction Model Considering Time and Input Error Using Electronic Medical Records in the Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Sung MinDong, Hahn Sangchul, Han Chang Hoon, Lee Jung Mo, Lee Jayoung, Yoo Jinkyu, Heo Jay, Kim Young Sam, Chung Kyung Soo

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Systems Informatics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

AITRICS. Inc, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 4;9(11):e26426. doi: 10.2196/26426.

DOI:10.2196/26426
PMID:34734837
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8603167/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the era of artificial intelligence, event prediction models are abundant. However, considering the limitation of the electronic medical record-based model, including the temporally skewed prediction and the record itself, these models could be delayed or could yield errors.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aim to develop multiple event prediction models in intensive care units to overcome their temporal skewness and evaluate their robustness against delayed and erroneous input.

METHODS

A total of 21,738 patients were included in the development cohort. Three events-death, sepsis, and acute kidney injury-were predicted. To overcome the temporal skewness, we developed three models for each event, which predicted the events in advance of three prespecified timepoints. Additionally, to evaluate the robustness against input error and delays, we added simulated errors and delayed input and calculated changes in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) values.

RESULTS

Most of the AUROC and area under the precision-recall curve values of each model were higher than those of the conventional scores, as well as other machine learning models previously used. In the error input experiment, except for our proposed model, an increase in the noise added to the model lowered the resulting AUROC value. However, the delayed input did not show the performance decreased in this experiment.

CONCLUSIONS

For a prediction model that was applicable in the real world, we considered not only performance but also temporal skewness, delayed input, and input error.

摘要

背景

在人工智能时代,事件预测模型众多。然而,考虑到基于电子病历的模型存在局限性,包括时间上的偏态预测以及病历本身的问题,这些模型可能会出现延迟或产生错误。

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在开发重症监护病房中的多种事件预测模型,以克服其时间偏态,并评估其对延迟和错误输入的鲁棒性。

方法

共有21738例患者纳入开发队列。预测了三种事件——死亡、脓毒症和急性肾损伤。为了克服时间偏态,我们针对每个事件开发了三种模型,这些模型在三个预先指定的时间点之前预测事件。此外,为了评估对输入错误和延迟的鲁棒性,我们添加了模拟错误和延迟输入,并计算了受试者操作特征曲线(AUROC)值下面积的变化。

结果

每个模型的大多数AUROC和精确召回率曲线下面积值均高于传统评分以及先前使用的其他机器学习模型。在错误输入实验中,除了我们提出的模型外,添加到模型中的噪声增加会降低所得的AUROC值。然而,在该实验中延迟输入并未显示性能下降。

结论

对于适用于现实世界的预测模型,我们不仅考虑了性能,还考虑了时间偏态、延迟输入和输入错误。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/3790cbe9bb24/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/7208fbdaaf3d/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/e9211e36c891/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/823a921bc95b/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/b39447072391/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/3790cbe9bb24/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/7208fbdaaf3d/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/e9211e36c891/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/823a921bc95b/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/b39447072391/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b29b/8603167/3790cbe9bb24/medinform_v9i11e26426_fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Event Prediction Model Considering Time and Input Error Using Electronic Medical Records in the Intensive Care Unit: Retrospective Study.使用重症监护病房电子病历的考虑时间和输入误差的事件预测模型:回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Nov 4;9(11):e26426. doi: 10.2196/26426.
2
Prediction of Sepsis in the Intensive Care Unit With Minimal Electronic Health Record Data: A Machine Learning Approach.利用最少电子健康记录数据预测重症监护病房中的脓毒症:一种机器学习方法。
JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Sep 30;4(3):e28. doi: 10.2196/medinform.5909.
3
Development and Validation of Unplanned Extubation Prediction Models Using Intensive Care Unit Data: Retrospective, Comparative, Machine Learning Study.基于 ICU 数据的非计划性拔管预测模型的开发和验证:回顾性、对比、机器学习研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 11;23(8):e23508. doi: 10.2196/23508.
4
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
5
Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using random forest model.应用随机森林模型预测 ICU 中急性肾损伤患者的院内死亡率。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 May;125:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.002. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
6
A Machine Learning Sepsis Prediction Algorithm for Intended Intensive Care Unit Use (NAVOY Sepsis): Proof-of-Concept Study.一种用于重症监护病房的机器学习脓毒症预测算法(NAVOY脓毒症):概念验证研究
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Sep 30;5(9):e28000. doi: 10.2196/28000.
7
[Comparison of machine learning method and logistic regression model in prediction of acute kidney injury in severely burned patients].[机器学习方法与逻辑回归模型在预测重度烧伤患者急性肾损伤中的比较]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 20;34(6):343-348. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.06.006.
8
Development of an unsupervised machine learning algorithm for the prognostication of walking ability in spinal cord injury patients.开发一种用于预测脊髓损伤患者行走能力的无监督机器学习算法。
Spine J. 2020 Feb;20(2):213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
9
Exploiting Missing Value Patterns for a Backdoor Attack on Machine Learning Models of Electronic Health Records: Development and Validation Study.利用缺失值模式对电子健康记录机器学习模型进行后门攻击:开发与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Aug 19;10(8):e38440. doi: 10.2196/38440.
10
[Prediction of intensive care unit readmission for critically ill patients based on ensemble learning].基于集成学习的危重症患者重症监护病房再入院预测
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2021 Jun 18;53(3):566-572. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.03.021.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning-Based Early Warning Systems in Hospitalized Patients at Risk of Code Blue Events and Length of Stay: Retrospective Real-World Implementation Study.基于深度学习的医院蓝色代码事件风险及住院时间的预警系统:回顾性真实世界实施研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Aug 22;13:e72232. doi: 10.2196/72232.
2
Clinical Context Is More Important than Data Quantity to the Performance of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Early Warning System.对于基于人工智能的早期预警系统的性能而言,临床背景比数据量更为重要。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 23;14(13):4444. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134444.
3
Validation of an artificial intelligence-based algorithm for predictive performance and risk stratification of sepsis using real-world data from hospitalised patients: a prospective observational study.

本文引用的文献

1
Dynamic and explainable machine learning prediction of mortality in patients in the intensive care unit: a retrospective study of high-frequency data in electronic patient records.动态可解释机器学习预测 ICU 患者死亡率:电子患者记录中高频数据的回顾性研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Apr;2(4):e179-e191. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30018-2. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
2
The development an artificial intelligence algorithm for early sepsis diagnosis in the intensive care unit.开发一种用于重症监护病房早期脓毒症诊断的人工智能算法。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104176. Epub 2020 May 21.
3
使用住院患者的真实世界数据验证基于人工智能的脓毒症预测性能和风险分层算法:一项前瞻性观察性研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jun 20;32(1):e101353. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101353.
4
Prospective external validation of a deep-learning-based early-warning system for major adverse events in general wards in South Korea.韩国普通病房基于深度学习的重大不良事件预警系统的前瞻性外部验证
Acute Crit Care. 2025 May;40(2):197-208. doi: 10.4266/acc.000525. Epub 2025 May 30.
5
Preserving Informative Presence: How Missing Data and Imputation Strategies Affect the Performance of an AI-Based Early Warning Score.保留信息性存在:缺失数据和插补策略如何影响基于人工智能的早期预警评分的性能
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 24;14(7):2213. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072213.
6
Distilling the knowledge from large-language model for health event prediction.从大语言模型中提取知识用于健康事件预测。
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):30675. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75331-2.
7
Mortality prediction with adaptive feature importance recalibration for peritoneal dialysis patients.基于自适应特征重要性重新校准的腹膜透析患者死亡率预测
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Dec 8;4(12):100892. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100892.
8
A Transfer Learning Approach to Correct the Temporal Performance Drift of Clinical Prediction Models: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于纠正临床预测模型时间性能漂移的迁移学习方法:回顾性队列研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Nov 9;10(11):e38053. doi: 10.2196/38053.
9
Machine Learning for Acute Kidney Injury Prediction in the Intensive Care Unit.机器学习在重症监护病房急性肾损伤预测中的应用。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2022 Sep;29(5):431-438. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2022.06.005.
Artificial Intelligence in the Intensive Care Unit.
人工智能在重症监护病房中的应用。
Crit Care. 2020 Mar 24;24(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2785-y.
4
Development of a Real-Time Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Critically Ill Patients Using Deep Learning: Retrospective Study.使用深度学习开发危重症患者院内心脏骤停的实时风险预测模型:回顾性研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2020 Mar 18;8(3):e16349. doi: 10.2196/16349.
5
Early prediction of circulatory failure in the intensive care unit using machine learning.使用机器学习对重症监护病房循环衰竭进行早期预测。
Nat Med. 2020 Mar;26(3):364-373. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0789-4. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
6
Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.机器学习在脓毒症预测中的应用:诊断试验准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Mar;46(3):383-400. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05872-y. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
7
A clinically applicable approach to continuous prediction of future acute kidney injury.一种临床适用的急性肾损伤未来发生的连续预测方法。
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7767):116-119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1390-1. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
8
Early Warning Systems: The Neglected Importance of Timing.早期预警系统:被忽视的时机重要性。
J Hosp Med. 2019 Jul 1;14(7):445-447. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3229. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
9
Evaluation of a machine learning algorithm for up to 48-hour advance prediction of sepsis using six vital signs.利用六个生命体征对脓毒症进行长达 48 小时的提前预测的机器学习算法评估。
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Jun;109:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
10
Machine Learning in Medicine.医学中的机器学习
N Engl J Med. 2019 Apr 4;380(14):1347-1358. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1814259.