Suppr超能文献

有条件现金转移与巴西青少年心理健康:来自 2004 年佩洛塔斯出生队列的证据。

Conditional cash transfers and adolescent mental health in Brazil: Evidence from the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort.

机构信息

Programa de Pós-graduação em Distúrbios do Desenvolvimento. Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, Brazil.

Postgraduate Program in Pediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2021 Oct 30;11:04066. doi: 10.7189/jogh.11.04066. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Young people living in poverty are at higher risk of mental disorders, but whether interventions aimed to reduce poverty have lasting effects on mental health has not been well established. We examined whether exposure to Brazil's conditional cash transfers programme (CCT), (BFP), during childhood reduces the risk of mental health problems in early adolescence.

METHODS

We used data from 2063 participants in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort study. Propensity score matching (PSM) estimated the association between BFP participation at age 6 and externalising problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire - SDQ and violent behaviour) and socio-emotional competencies (Development and Well-Being Assessment questionnaire, and the Nowick-Strickland Internal-External Scale) at age 11.

RESULTS

PSM results suggest that programme participation at age of six was not significantly associated with externalising problems ( = 0.433), prosocial behaviour ( = 0.654), violent behaviour ( = 0.342), social aptitudes ( = 0.281), positive attributes ( = 0.439), or locus of control ( = 0.148) at the age of 11 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Participation in BFP during childhood was not associated with improved or worsened mental health in early adolescence. While we cannot fully discard that findings may be due to adverse selection, results suggest that CCTs alone may not be sufficient to improve mental health outcomes and would be prudent to assess whether mental health interventions as an addition to CCTs may be helpful.

摘要

背景

生活贫困的年轻人患精神障碍的风险更高,但旨在减少贫困的干预措施是否对心理健康有持久影响尚未得到充分证实。我们研究了童年时期接触巴西有条件现金转移支付计划(BFP)是否会降低青少年早期出现心理健康问题的风险。

方法

我们使用了 2004 年佩洛塔斯出生队列研究中 2063 名参与者的数据。倾向评分匹配(PSM)估计了 BFP 在 6 岁时的参与与外化问题(长处与困难问卷- SDQ 和暴力行为)和社会情感能力(发展和幸福感评估问卷以及诺威克-斯特里克兰内外向量表)之间的关联在 11 岁时。

结果

PSM 结果表明,6 岁时的计划参与与外化问题( = 0.433)、亲社会行为( = 0.654)、暴力行为( = 0.342)、社会适应能力( = 0.281)、积极属性( = 0.439)或控制源( = 0.148)无显著相关性在 11 岁时。

结论

童年时期参与 BFP 与青少年早期心理健康状况的改善或恶化无关。虽然我们不能完全排除发现可能是由于选择偏差造成的,但结果表明,仅实施现金转移支付计划可能不足以改善心理健康结果,因此有必要评估将心理健康干预措施作为现金转移支付计划的补充是否可能有所帮助。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验