Suppr超能文献

在跨专业交流中接受或放弃权力来源:对以患者为中心的表达意见的影响。

Embracing or relinquishing sources of power in interprofessional communication: implications for patient-centered speaking up.

作者信息

Farrell Susan E, Bochatay Naike, Kim Sara

机构信息

Harvard Medical School, Director, Continuing and Professional Development, Center for Interprofessional Studies and Innovation, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, Ucsf Division of Pediatric Critical Care, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Interprof Care. 2021 Nov 7:1-8. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2021.1975665.

Abstract

Health professionals working in an interprofessional work environment are entrusted to speak up on behalf of patients. However, that environment is comprised of dynamic intra- and interprofessional hierarchies, characterized by power differentials that affect speaking up behaviors. Drawing on the social bases of power and on power/interaction theory, we analyzed focus group and interview transcripts of 62 health professionals' accounts of speaking up. We focused on their primary sources of power, and described factors associated with health professionals' embracing power to speak up for patient safety, as well as those associated with relinquishing power and remaining silent. Nurses primarily employed direct patient information as a source of power to advocate for patients. Senior nurses and attending physicians exercised their legitimate power through titles or expertise, and when embracing that power, often influenced the healthcare team's speaking up behaviors and the team environment. Physician trainees perceived to have limited sources of power. Participants reported using hospital policies, relationships, and humor for engaging in speaking up behavior. Relinquishing power and remaining silent were associated with fear, anxiety, and lack of confidence. Given the complex, hierarchical environment in healthcare, leaders' inclusive behaviors for setting a culture for speaking up, including modeling speaking up, are critical.

摘要

在跨专业工作环境中工作的医疗专业人员被委托代表患者发声。然而,这种环境由动态的专业内和专业间等级制度组成,其特点是权力差异会影响发声行为。基于权力的社会基础和权力/互动理论,我们分析了62名医疗专业人员关于发声的焦点小组和访谈记录。我们关注他们的主要权力来源,并描述了与医疗专业人员运用权力为患者安全发声相关的因素,以及与放弃权力并保持沉默相关的因素。护士主要将直接的患者信息作为为患者发声的权力来源。高级护士和主治医生通过头衔或专业知识行使其合法权力,当运用这种权力时,他们常常会影响医疗团队的发声行为和团队环境。实习医生认为自己的权力来源有限。参与者报告称,他们利用医院政策、人际关系和幽默来进行发声行为。放弃权力并保持沉默与恐惧、焦虑和缺乏信心有关。鉴于医疗保健领域复杂的等级制度环境,领导者营造一种鼓励发声的文化的包容行为,包括以身作则发声,至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验