• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年噪音态度量表中文版的心理测量特性:一项大样本代表性横断面研究。

Psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the youth attitude to noise scale: a cross-sectional study in a large representative sample.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e049722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049722.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049722
PMID:34753755
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8578966/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the Youth Attitude to Noise Scale (YANS) in a large representative sample.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

15 secondary schools in Hong Kong, China.

PARTICIPANTS

2842 adolescents aged 12-20 years participated in this study between April and July 2016.

METHODS

The standard forward-backward validation procedures were followed to obtain the traditional Chinese version of the YANS. Prior to the formal investigation, the YANS was evaluated by cognitive debriefing. The sample was randomly divided into two halves for exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) and confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), respectively. The number of factors was determined by comparison data approach using EFAs, and the factor structure was confirmed by CFAs using the one-factor, four-factor and bifactor models. The scale's internal reliability, dimensionality and measurement invariance across gender and age groups were also examined.

RESULTS

EFAs (n=1338) showed that four factors were extracted, and CFAs (n=1337) demonstrated the bifactor model fitted better to the sample than the other models. Additionally, the traditional Chinese version of the YANS showed high reliability (ω=0.84), a general factor, scale multidimensionality, and gender and age invariance.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the current study indicate that the traditional Chinese version of the YANS is a feasible instrument to assess attitude to noise in Chinese adolescents, regardless of their gender and age. Given the presence of a general factor, the YANS is not merely multidimensional, and whether to use the total or subscale scores is recommended to rely on research objectives.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在大规模代表性样本中检验繁体中文版青少年噪音态度量表(YANS)的心理测量特性。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

中国香港的 15 所中学。

参与者

2016 年 4 月至 7 月期间,2842 名 12-20 岁的青少年参加了这项研究。

方法

采用标准的正向-反向验证程序获得繁体中文版 YANS。在正式调查之前,通过认知剖析对 YANS 进行了评估。将样本随机分为两半,分别进行探索性因素分析(EFA)和验证性因素分析(CFA)。通过 EFA 比较数据方法确定因素数量,并通过 CFA 使用单因素、四因素和双因素模型确认因素结构。还检查了量表的内部一致性、维度和跨性别和年龄组的测量不变性。

结果

EFA(n=1338)显示出四个因素被提取出来,CFA(n=1337)表明双因素模型比其他模型更适合样本。此外,繁体中文版 YANS 表现出较高的可靠性(ω=0.84)、一个一般因素、多维量表和性别和年龄不变性。

结论

本研究的结果表明,繁体中文版 YANS 是评估中国青少年对噪音态度的一种可行工具,无论其性别和年龄如何。鉴于存在一个一般因素,YANS 不仅是多维的,是否使用总分或分量表得分,建议根据研究目的而定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61c7/8578966/59e5e8d6d5d3/bmjopen-2021-049722f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61c7/8578966/59e5e8d6d5d3/bmjopen-2021-049722f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/61c7/8578966/59e5e8d6d5d3/bmjopen-2021-049722f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the traditional Chinese version of the youth attitude to noise scale: a cross-sectional study in a large representative sample.青少年噪音态度量表中文版的心理测量特性:一项大样本代表性横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 9;11(11):e049722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049722.
2
Translation, cultural adaptation, and validation of the "Youth Attitude to Noise Scale" into Turkish (YANS-Tr).将“青少年噪音态度量表”(YANS-Tr)译为土耳其语:翻译、文化适应和验证。
Noise Health. 2022 Apr-Jun;24(113):89-95. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_70_21.
3
Translation, adaptation and validation of the youth attitude to noise scale (YANS) questionnaire into serbian language.青少年对噪声态度量表(YANS)问卷的塞尔维亚语翻译、改编和验证。
Noise Health. 2020 Apr-Jun;22(105):56-61. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_23_20.
4
Chinese-adapted youth attitude to noise scale: evaluation of validity and reliability.中文版青少年噪声态度量表:效度与信度评估
Noise Health. 2014 Jul-Aug;16(71):218-22. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.137055.
5
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in a large and representative Swedish sample: is the use of the total scale and subscale scores justified?基于大样本和代表性瑞典样本的证据为本实践态度量表(EBPAS)的验证性因子分析:使用总量表和分量表得分是否合理?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01126-4.
6
Obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a normative Chinese sample of youth: prevalence, symptom dimensions, and factor structure of the Leyton Obsessional Inventory--Child Version.中国青少年正常样本中的强迫症状:莱顿强迫观念量表儿童版的患病率、症状维度和因子结构
J Affect Disord. 2014 Aug;164:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
7
Psychometric evaluation of the traditional Chinese version of the resilience Scale-14 and assessment of resilience in Hong Kong adolescents.中文版韧性量表 14 条目的心理计量学评估及香港青少年韧性评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Feb 19;18(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01285-4.
8
Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床学习环境比较调查中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
9
Psychometric properties and gender invariance of the simplified Chinese version of Night Eating Questionnaire in a large sample of mainland Chinese college students.中文版夜食问卷在中国大陆大学生大样本中的心理测量学特性及性别不变性
Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Feb;24(1):57-66. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0553-7. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
10
Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS).荷兰版循证实践态度量表(EBPAS)的心理测量特性。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2015 Nov 16;13:69. doi: 10.1186/s12961-015-0058-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Personal Listening Device Use and Attitude to Noise in Relation to Depression and Anxiety among Medical Students.医学生使用个人听力设备与对噪声的态度同抑郁和焦虑的关系。
Noise Health. 2023 Jul-Sep;25(118):176-182. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_27_23.

本文引用的文献

1
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) in a large and representative Swedish sample: is the use of the total scale and subscale scores justified?基于大样本和代表性瑞典样本的证据为本实践态度量表(EBPAS)的验证性因子分析:使用总量表和分量表得分是否合理?
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Oct 14;20(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01126-4.
2
Association between Non-Restorative Sleep and Quality of Life in Chinese Adolescents.非恢复性睡眠与中国青少年生活质量的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 4;17(19):7249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197249.
3
The Place of the Bifactor Model in Confirmatory Factor Analysis Investigations Into Construct Dimensionality in Language Testing.
双因素模型在语言测试构念维度验证性因素分析研究中的地位
Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 17;11:1357. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357. eCollection 2020.
4
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for Spanish 5- to 17-Year-Olds.长处与困难问卷:西班牙 5 至 17 岁儿童的心理测量特性和常模数据。
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1445-1458. doi: 10.1177/1073191120918929. Epub 2020 May 25.
5
An Investigation of Alternative Factor Models of Impulsivity using the UPPS-P.使用 UPPS-P 对冲动的替代因素模型进行研究。
J Pers Assess. 2021 May-Jun;103(3):324-331. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1739059. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
6
Noise levels at baseball stadiums and the spectators' attitude to noise.棒球场的噪音水平以及观众对噪音的态度。
Noise Health. 2019 Mar-Apr;21(99):47-54. doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_39_18.
7
Measuring Positive Mental Health in the Postpartum Period: The Bifactor Structure of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form in Portuguese Women.测量产后时期的积极心理健康:葡萄牙女性心理健康连续体-短式量表的双因素结构。
Assessment. 2021 Jul;28(5):1434-1444. doi: 10.1177/1073191120910247. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
8
The Reasons for Living Inventory for Young Adults (RFL-YA-II).青年成人生存理由量表(RFL-YA-II)
Assessment. 2021 Apr;28(3):942-954. doi: 10.1177/1073191119900242. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
9
Examining the Dimensionality, Reliability, and Invariance of the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) Across Eight Countries.考察抑郁、焦虑和压力量表 21 项(DASS-21)在八个国家的维度、信度和不变性。
Assessment. 2021 Sep;28(6):1531-1544. doi: 10.1177/1073191119887449. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
10
Development and Psychometric Properties of the Sussex-Oxford Compassion Scales (SOCS). Sussex-Oxford 共情量表(SOCS)的编制及心理测量学特性。
Assessment. 2020 Jan;27(1):3-20. doi: 10.1177/1073191119860911. Epub 2019 Jul 29.