Institute of Molecular Biosciences, NAWI Graz, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
BioHealth Graz, Graz, Austria.
EMBO Mol Med. 2022 Jan 11;14(1):e14418. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202114418. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
Age-associated diseases are rising to pandemic proportions, exposing the need for efficient and low-cost methods to tackle these maladies at symptomatic, behavioral, metabolic, and physiological levels. While nutrition and health are closely intertwined, our limited understanding of how diet precisely influences disease often precludes the medical use of specific dietary interventions. Caloric restriction (CR) has approached clinical application as a powerful, yet simple, dietary modulation that extends both life- and healthspan in model organisms and ameliorates various diseases. However, due to psychological and social-behavioral limitations, CR may be challenging to implement into real life. Thus, CR-mimicking interventions have been developed, including intermittent fasting, time-restricted eating, and macronutrient modulation. Nonetheless, possible side effects of CR and alternatives thereof must be carefully considered. We summarize key concepts and differences in these dietary interventions in humans, discuss their molecular effects, and shed light on advantages and disadvantages.
与年龄相关的疾病正在呈流行趋势,这凸显出我们需要高效且低成本的方法来解决这些疾病在症状、行为、代谢和生理水平上的问题。尽管营养与健康密切相关,但我们对饮食如何确切影响疾病的了解有限,这往往使我们无法将特定的饮食干预措施应用于医学。热量限制 (CR) 作为一种强大而简单的饮食调节方式,已经接近临床应用,它可以延长模型生物的寿命和健康寿命,并改善各种疾病。然而,由于心理和社会行为方面的限制,CR 在实际生活中可能难以实施。因此,已经开发出了 CR 模拟干预措施,包括间歇性禁食、限时进食和宏量营养素调节。尽管如此,CR 及其替代品的可能副作用仍需仔细考虑。我们总结了这些饮食干预措施在人类中的关键概念和差异,讨论了它们的分子作用,并阐明了它们的优缺点。