• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过能力方法成熟度模型实现有效和可持续的全球学术伙伴关系。

Towards effective and sustainable global academic partnerships through a maturity model informed by the capability approach.

机构信息

Centre for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Global Health & Infection Department, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Global Health. 2021 Nov 20;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00785-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12992-021-00785-2
PMID:34801031
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8605458/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shortage of skilled workforce is a global concern but represents a critical bottleneck to Africa's development. While global academic partnerships have the potential to help tackle this development bottleneck, they are criticised for inadequate attention to equity, impact, and sustainability. We propose a new values-driven partnership model for sustainable and equitable global partnerships that achieve impact.

METHOD

The model was based on the authors' experiences of participation in over 30 partnerships and used insights from the Capability Approach.

RESULTS

We developed an Academic Partnership Maturity Model, with five levels of maturity, extending from pre-contemplative to mature partnerships. The level of maturity increases depending on the level of freedom, equity, diversity, and agency afforded to the partners. The approach offers a framework for establishing a forward-looking partnership anchored in mutual learning, empowerment, and autonomy.

CONCLUSION

This is a pragmatic model limited by the biases of experiential knowledge. Further development of the concept, including metrics and an evaluation tool kit are needed to assist partners and funders.

摘要

背景

技能型劳动力短缺是一个全球性问题,但却是非洲发展的关键瓶颈。尽管全球学术伙伴关系有可能有助于解决这一发展瓶颈,但它们也因对公平、影响和可持续性的关注不足而受到批评。我们提出了一种新的以价值观为导向的伙伴关系模式,以实现可持续和公平的全球伙伴关系并取得影响力。

方法

该模型基于作者参与 30 多个伙伴关系的经验,并利用能力方法的见解。

结果

我们开发了一个学术伙伴关系成熟度模型,有五个成熟度级别,从无考虑到成熟伙伴关系。成熟度级别取决于合作伙伴享有的自由度、公平性、多样性和代理权的水平。该方法提供了一个建立以相互学习、赋权和自主为基础的前瞻性伙伴关系的框架。

结论

这是一个受经验知识偏见限制的实用模型。需要进一步发展这一概念,包括指标和评估工具包,以协助合作伙伴和资助者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/8605600/fd7690fd5d16/12992_2021_785_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/8605600/b9de48b1df5f/12992_2021_785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/8605600/fd7690fd5d16/12992_2021_785_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/8605600/b9de48b1df5f/12992_2021_785_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1713/8605600/fd7690fd5d16/12992_2021_785_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards effective and sustainable global academic partnerships through a maturity model informed by the capability approach.通过能力方法成熟度模型实现有效和可持续的全球学术伙伴关系。
Global Health. 2021 Nov 20;17(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12992-021-00785-2.
2
The Bidirectional Engagement and Equity (BEE) Research Framework to Guide Community-Academic Partnerships: Developed From a Narrative Review and Diverse Stakeholder Perspectives.指导社区-学术伙伴关系的双向参与与公平(BEE)研究框架:基于叙事性综述和多元利益相关者视角制定
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14161. doi: 10.1111/hex.14161.
3
Building and Sustaining Effective Partnerships for Training the Next Generation of Global Health Leaders.建立和维持有效的伙伴关系,以培养下一代全球卫生领导者。
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Jul 12;87(1):66. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3214. eCollection 2021.
4
Bending the Arc towards Equitable Partnerships in Global Health and Applied Training.《全球健康与应用培训中的公平伙伴关系》
Ann Glob Health. 2019 Nov 6;85(1):130. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2564.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
Building the foundation for equitable and inclusive research: Seed grant programs to facilitate development of diverse CBPR community-academic research partnerships.为公平和包容性研究奠定基础:种子基金项目助力多元社区-学术研究伙伴关系的发展。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Nov 24;7(1):e2. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.495. eCollection 2023.
7
Establishing and sustaining authentic organizational partnerships in childhood disability research: lessons learned.在儿童残疾研究中建立并维持真正的组织伙伴关系:经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 20;9(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00466-x.
8
Sustainable Academic-Clinical Alliance: A Model to Improve Academic-Practice Partnerships.可持续学术-临床联盟:改善学术-实践伙伴关系的模式。
J Dr Nurs Pract. 2024 Aug 5;17(2):77-85. doi: 10.1891/JDNP-2023-0027.
9
Enhancing Capacity of Community-Academic Partnerships to Achieve Health Equity: Results From the CBPR Partnership Academy.增强社区-学术伙伴关系的能力以实现健康公平:基于 CBPR 伙伴关系学院的研究结果。
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jul;21(4):552-563. doi: 10.1177/1524839918818830. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
10
Power, potential, and pitfalls in global health academic partnerships: review and reflections on an approach in Nepal.全球卫生学术伙伴关系中的力量、潜力与陷阱:对尼泊尔一种方法的回顾与思考
Glob Health Action. 2017;10(1):1367161. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1367161.

引用本文的文献

1
Development, implementation, and evaluation of an innovative clinical trial operations training program for Africa (ClinOps).针对非洲的创新型临床试验操作培训项目(ClinOps)的开发、实施与评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06733-7.
2
Global mental health and its social determinants: How should we intervene?全球心理健康及其社会决定因素:我们应该如何干预?
Behav Res Ther. 2023 Oct;169:104402. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104402. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
3
Mutuality as a method: advancing a social paradigm for global mental health through mutual learning.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding the key processes of excellence as a prerequisite to establishing academic centres of excellence in Africa.了解卓越的关键过程是在非洲建立卓越学术中心的先决条件。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Jan 7;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02471-0.
2
Investing in health R&D: where we are, what limits us, and how to make progress in Africa.投资于卫生领域的研发:我们所处的位置、限制我们的因素以及如何在非洲取得进展。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Mar 4;4(2):e001047. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001047. eCollection 2019.
3
Academic partnerships between rich and poor countries.
互惠作为一种方法:通过相互学习推进全球心理健康的社会范式。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Mar;59(3):545-553. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02493-1. Epub 2023 Jul 1.
贫富国家之间的学术伙伴关系。
Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1055-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60466-3.