• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group.脆弱拟杆菌群的纸片扩散药敏试验
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Oct;31(10):1596-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.10.1596.
2
Development of EUCAST disk diffusion method for susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group isolates.欧盟CAST纸片扩散法用于脆弱拟杆菌群分离株药敏试验的开发。
Anaerobe. 2015 Feb;31:65-71. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
3
Beta-lactamase production and susceptibilities to amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, cefoxitin, imipenem, and metronidazole of 320 non-Bacteroides fragilis Bacteroides isolates and 129 fusobacteria from 28 U.S. centers.来自美国28个中心的320株非脆弱拟杆菌属拟杆菌分离株和129株梭杆菌属细菌的β-内酰胺酶产生情况以及对阿莫西林、阿莫西林-克拉维酸、替卡西林、替卡西林-克拉维酸、头孢西丁、亚胺培南和甲硝唑的敏感性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990 Aug;34(8):1546-50. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.8.1546.
4
Comparison of the bactericidal activity of clindamycin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.克林霉素和甲硝唑对脆弱拟杆菌群中对头孢西丁敏感及耐药菌株的杀菌活性比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;14(5):377-82. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90064-m.
5
In-vitro activity of amoxycillin and ticarcillin in combination with clavulanic acid compared with that of new beta-lactam agents against species of the Bacteroides fragilis group.阿莫西林和替卡西林与克拉维酸联合使用的体外活性与新型β-内酰胺类药物针对脆弱拟杆菌群各菌种的活性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 May;17(5):593-603. doi: 10.1093/jac/17.5.593.
6
Evolution of antimicrobial susceptibility in isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group in Spain.西班牙脆弱拟杆菌群菌株的抗菌药物敏感性演变
Rev Infect Dis. 1990 Jan-Feb;12 Suppl 2:S142-51. doi: 10.1093/clinids/12.supplement_2.s142.
7
Survey of Bacteroides fragilis group susceptibility patterns in Canada.加拿大脆弱拟杆菌群药敏模式调查。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Feb;36(2):343-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.2.343.
8
Comparative susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group species and other anaerobic bacteria to meropenem, imipenem, piperacillin, cefoxitin, ampicillin/sulbactam, clindamycin and metronidazole.脆弱拟杆菌群物种及其他厌氧菌对美罗培南、亚胺培南、哌拉西林、头孢西丁、氨苄西林/舒巴坦、克林霉素和甲硝唑的敏感性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Mar;31(3):363-72. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.3.363.
9
In vitro susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in community hospitals.社区医院中脆弱拟杆菌属菌群的体外药敏试验
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1986 Nov;5(4):317-22. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(86)90035-0.
10
Annual incidence, epidemiology, and comparative in vitro susceptibilities to cefoxitin, cefotetan, cefmetazole, and ceftizoxime of recent community-acquired isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.脆弱拟杆菌群近期社区获得性分离株的年发病率、流行病学以及对头孢西丁、头孢替坦、头孢美唑和头孢唑肟的体外敏感性比较
J Clin Microbiol. 1988 Nov;26(11):2361-6. doi: 10.1128/jcm.26.11.2361-2366.1988.

引用本文的文献

1
Fifty years devoted to anaerobes: historical, lessons, and highlights.五十载专研厌氧菌:历史、经验与亮点。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jan;43(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04708-4. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
2
Pathogenic potential of revealed in a splenic abscess case: a truth unfolded.揭示脾脓肿病例中的致病潜能:真相大白。
BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Dec 13;13(12):e236701. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-236701.
3
Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.E试验用于厌氧菌药敏试验的评估。
J Clin Microbiol. 1991 Oct;29(10):2197-203. doi: 10.1128/jcm.29.10.2197-2203.1991.
4
Susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria: myth, magic, or method?厌氧菌的药敏试验:神话、魔法还是方法?
Clin Microbiol Rev. 1991 Oct;4(4):470-84. doi: 10.1128/CMR.4.4.470.
5
Antimicrobial prophylaxis for major head and neck surgery in cancer patients: sulbactam-ampicillin versus clindamycin-amikacin.癌症患者头颈部大手术的抗菌预防:舒巴坦-氨苄西林与克林霉素-阿米卡星的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Sep;36(9):2014-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.9.2014.
6
Review of methods for susceptibility testing of anaerobes.厌氧菌药敏试验方法综述。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Nov;11(11):1025-31. doi: 10.1007/BF01967794.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent experience with antimicrobial susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria: increasing resistance to penicillin.近期厌氧菌对抗菌药物敏感性的经验:对青霉素的耐药性增加。
Mayo Clin Proc. 1982 Dec;57(12):737-41.
2
Susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria from several French hospitals to three major antibiotics.来自法国几家医院的厌氧菌对三种主要抗生素的敏感性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Jun;25(6):764-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.25.6.764.
3
Standardized antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. I. Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to tetracycline.厌氧菌的标准化抗菌药敏试验。I. 脆弱拟杆菌对四环素的敏感性
Appl Microbiol. 1972 Feb;23(2):268-75. doi: 10.1128/am.23.2.268-275.1972.
4
Modified broth-disk method for testing the antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria.用于检测厌氧菌抗生素敏感性的改良肉汤-纸片法
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Mar;3(3):350-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.3.350.
5
Susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis to six antibiotics determined by standardized antimicrobial disc susceptibility testing.通过标准化抗菌药敏试验测定脆弱拟杆菌对六种抗生素的敏感性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Feb;3(2):188-93. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.2.188.
6
Standardized single-disc method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria.厌氧菌抗生素敏感性测试的标准化单碟法
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Jun;1(6):451-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.1.6.451.
7
Evaluation of four disk diffusion methods for antimicrobic susceptibility tests with anaerobic gram-negative bacilli.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1974 May;61(5):592-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/61.5.592.
8
Susceptibility tests of anaerobic bacteria: statistical and clinical considerations.厌氧菌药敏试验:统计学与临床考量
J Infect Dis. 1974 Dec;130(6):588-94. doi: 10.1093/infdis/130.6.588.
9
Nationwide study of the susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group in the United States.美国全国范围内脆弱拟杆菌群药敏性研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Nov;28(5):675-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.5.675.
10
Survey of anaerobic susceptibility patterns in Canada.加拿大厌氧菌药敏模式调查。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Nov;30(5):798-801. doi: 10.1128/AAC.30.5.798.

脆弱拟杆菌群的纸片扩散药敏试验

Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of the Bacteroides fragilis group.

作者信息

Horn R, Bourgault A M, Lamothe F

机构信息

Service de Microbiologie et Maladies Infectieuses, Hôpital Saint-Luc, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1987 Oct;31(10):1596-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.10.1596.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.31.10.1596
PMID:3481247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC174997/
Abstract

The susceptibilities of 225 isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group to six antibiotics were determined by a new disk diffusion test in Wilkins-Chalgren agar and by the standard agar dilution method. For disk diffusion, the bacteria were directly suspended in saline and immediately swabbed onto 15-cm agar plates. Disks of cefoxitin (30 micrograms), chloramphenicol (30 micrograms), clindamycin (2 micrograms), moxalactam (30 micrograms), imipenem (10 micrograms), and ticarcillin (75 micrograms) were applied, and the plates were incubated at 37 degrees C in an anaerobic atmosphere. Zone sizes were measured at 24 h. The results of disk diffusion and agar dilution were compared by regression analysis by the method of least squares and by the error rate-bounded method. Zones were easily measured for 216 strains (96%). The correlation between the MICs and diameters of inhibition for cefoxitin, clindamycin, moxalactam, and ticarcillin was generally good. A correlation could not be established for chloramphenicol and imipenem, as there were too few resistant strains. With the recommended resistance breakpoints, the following susceptible and resistant zone diameter breakpoints could be established: cefoxitin, less than or equal to 19 and greater than or equal to 21 mm; clindamycin, less than or equal to 14 and greater than or equal to 18 mm; moxalactam, less than or equal to 21 and greater than or equal to 25 mm; and ticarcillin, less than or equal to 15 and greater than or equal to 16 mm. By applying these zone criteria, the percentage of false-susceptible strains was less than 1% and of false-resistant strains was less than 4% for the drugs tested.

摘要

采用新的纸片扩散法在威尔金斯-查尔格伦琼脂培养基中以及标准琼脂稀释法,测定了225株脆弱拟杆菌属细菌对六种抗生素的敏感性。对于纸片扩散法,将细菌直接悬浮于盐水中,然后立即接种于15厘米的琼脂平板上。分别贴上头孢西丁(30微克)、氯霉素(30微克)、克林霉素(2微克)、拉氧头孢(30微克)、亚胺培南(10微克)和替卡西林(75微克)的纸片,平板在37℃厌氧环境下孵育。在24小时时测量抑菌圈大小。通过最小二乘法回归分析和误差率限定法比较纸片扩散法和琼脂稀释法的结果。216株菌株(96%)的抑菌圈大小易于测量。头孢西丁、克林霉素、拉氧头孢和替卡西林的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与抑菌直径之间的相关性总体良好。由于耐药菌株过少,无法确定氯霉素和亚胺培南的相关性。根据推荐的耐药界值,可确定以下敏感和耐药抑菌圈直径界值:头孢西丁,小于或等于19毫米且大于或等于21毫米;克林霉素,小于或等于14毫米且大于或等于18毫米;拉氧头孢,小于或等于21毫米且大于或等于25毫米;替卡西林,小于或等于15毫米且大于或等于16毫米。应用这些抑菌圈标准,所测试药物的假敏感菌株百分比小于1%,假耐药菌株百分比小于4%。