• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predictors to Use Mobile Apps for Monitoring COVID-19 Symptoms and Contact Tracing: Survey Among Dutch Citizens.使用移动应用程序监测新冠病毒症状和接触者追踪的预测因素:荷兰公民调查
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 20;5(12):e28416. doi: 10.2196/28416.
2
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
3
Investigating the effective factors of using mHealth apps for monitoring COVID-19 symptoms and contact tracing: A survey among Iranian citizens.调查使用移动医疗应用程序监测 COVID-19 症状和接触者追踪的有效因素:对伊朗公民的调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Nov;155:104571. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104571. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
4
Modeling Trust in COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Apps Using the Human-Computer Trust Scale: Online Survey Study.使用人机信任量表对新冠疫情接触者追踪应用程序中的信任进行建模:在线调查研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 13;9(2):e33951. doi: 10.2196/33951.
5
To Use or Not to Use a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Mixed Methods Survey in Wales.使用还是不使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:威尔士的混合方法调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 22;9(11):e29181. doi: 10.2196/29181.
6
Utilizing Health Behavior Change and Technology Acceptance Models to Predict the Adoption of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Cross-sectional Survey Study.利用健康行为改变和技术接受模型预测 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 19;23(5):e25447. doi: 10.2196/25447.
7
Investigating Citizens' Acceptance of Contact Tracing Apps: Quantitative Study of the Role of Trust and Privacy.调查公民对接种追踪应用程序的接受程度:信任和隐私作用的定量研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 18;12:e48700. doi: 10.2196/48700.
8
Prosociality and the Uptake of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Survey Analysis of Intergenerational Differences in Japan.亲社会行为与 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:日本代际差异的调查分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Aug 19;9(8):e29923. doi: 10.2196/29923.
9
Ready or Not for Contact Tracing? Investigating the Adoption Intention of COVID-19 Contact-Tracing Technology Using an Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model.准备好进行接触者追踪了吗?使用扩展的统一技术接受和使用理论模型调查 COVID-19 接触者追踪技术的采用意愿。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Jun;24(6):377-383. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0483. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
10
Considerations for the Design and Implementation of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Scoping Review.考虑设计和实施 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的因素:范围综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 9;9(6):e27102. doi: 10.2196/27102.

引用本文的文献

1
[Analysis of skills and perceptions regarding mHealth in the management of chronic patients by primary care professionals].[基层医疗专业人员在慢性病患者管理中对移动健康的技能与认知分析]
Aten Primaria. 2025 Feb;57(2):103142. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2024.103142. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Determinants of Citizens' Intention to Participate in Self-Led Contact Tracing: Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Study.公民参与自我主导接触者追踪意愿的决定因素:横断面在线问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Oct 30;10:e56943. doi: 10.2196/56943.
3
Use of a Health Monitoring System During a US Military Exercise During the COVID-19 Pandemic (April 2021): Participant Characteristics, Demographics and Differences in Participation.2021年4月新冠疫情期间美军演习中健康监测系统的使用:参与者特征、人口统计学及参与差异
J Mil Veterans Health. 2024 Jan 14;32(1):6-17.
4
Willingness to Use Digital Health Screening and Tracking Tools for Public Health in Sexual Minority Populations in a National Probability Sample: Quantitative Intersectional Analysis.在全国概率样本中,性少数群体对公共卫生数字健康筛查和跟踪工具的使用意愿:定量交叉分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Mar 8;26:e47448. doi: 10.2196/47448.
5
The epidemiological impact of digital and manual contact tracing on the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in the Netherlands: Empirical evidence.数字与人工接触者追踪对荷兰SARS-CoV-2疫情的流行病学影响:实证证据
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Dec 29;2(12):e0000396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000396. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Guide Development for eHealth Interventions Targeting People With a Low Socioeconomic Position: Participatory Design Approach.针对社会经济地位较低人群的电子健康干预措施指南制定:参与式设计方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 4;25:e48461. doi: 10.2196/48461.
7
Antecedents predicting digital contact tracing acceptance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预测数字接触者追踪接受度的前置因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02313-1.
8
Citizen involvement in COVID-19 contact tracing with digital tools: a qualitative study to explore citizens' perspectives and needs.公民参与使用数字工具进行 COVID-19 接触者追踪:一项探索公民观点和需求的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 16;23(1):1804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16664-x.
9
The Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact-Tracing App: Cluster Analysis.一款新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的采用情况:聚类分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 20;7:e41479. doi: 10.2196/41479.
10
The Impact of Individuals' Social Environments on Contact Tracing App Use: Survey Study.个体社会环境对接触者追踪应用程序使用的影响:调查研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 May 31;10:e45825. doi: 10.2196/45825.

本文引用的文献

1
The Dutch COVID-19 Contact Tracing App (the CoronaMelder): Usability Study.荷兰新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序(CoronaMelder):可用性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Mar 26;5(3):e27882. doi: 10.2196/27882.
2
Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study.德国大规模采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的障碍:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 2;23(3):e23362. doi: 10.2196/23362.
3
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
4
Impact of lockdown on COVID-19 epidemic in Île-de-France and possible exit strategies.封锁对法兰西岛 COVID-19 疫情的影响及可能的退出策略。
BMC Med. 2020 Jul 30;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01698-4.
5
Emergency Response to COVID-19 in Canada: Platform Development and Implementation for eHealth in Crisis Management.加拿大对 COVID-19 的紧急应对:危机管理中的电子健康平台开发与实施。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 May 15;6(2):e18995. doi: 10.2196/18995.
6
Quantifying SARS-CoV-2 transmission suggests epidemic control with digital contact tracing.量化 SARS-CoV-2 传播表明数字接触者追踪可控制疫情。
Science. 2020 May 8;368(6491). doi: 10.1126/science.abb6936. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
7
Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?高血压和糖尿病患者感染新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)的风险会增加吗?
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):e21. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
8
Mobile Health Apps to Facilitate Self-Care: A Qualitative Study of User Experiences.促进自我护理的移动健康应用程序:用户体验的定性研究
PLoS One. 2016 May 23;11(5):e0156164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156164. eCollection 2016.
9
Public knowledge and preventive behavior during a large-scale Salmonella outbreak: results from an online survey in the Netherlands.大规模沙门氏菌爆发期间的公众知识和预防行为:荷兰在线调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 31;14:100. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-100.
10
Understanding determinants of consumer mobile health usage intentions, assimilation, and channel preferences.了解消费者移动健康使用意愿、同化情况及渠道偏好的决定因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Aug 2;15(8):e149. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2635.

使用移动应用程序监测新冠病毒症状和接触者追踪的预测因素:荷兰公民调查

Predictors to Use Mobile Apps for Monitoring COVID-19 Symptoms and Contact Tracing: Survey Among Dutch Citizens.

作者信息

Jansen-Kosterink Stephanie, Hurmuz Marian, den Ouden Marjolein, van Velsen Lex

机构信息

eHealth Department, Roessingh Research and Development, Enschede, Netherlands.

Biomedical Signals and Systems Group, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2021 Dec 20;5(12):e28416. doi: 10.2196/28416.

DOI:10.2196/28416
PMID:34818210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8691407/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

eHealth apps have been recognized as a valuable tool to reduce COVID-19's effective reproduction number. The factors that determine the acceptance of COVID-19 apps remain unknown. The exception here is privacy.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article was to identify antecedents of acceptance of (1) a mobile app for COVID-19 symptom recognition and monitoring and (2) a mobile app for contact tracing, both by means of an online survey among Dutch citizens.

METHODS

Next to the demographics, the online survey contained questions focusing on perceived health, fear of COVID-19, and intention to use. We used snowball sampling via posts on social media and personal connections. To identify antecedents of the model for acceptance of the 2 mobile apps, we conducted multiple linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 238 Dutch adults completed the survey; 59.2% (n=141) of the responders were female and the average age was 45.6 years (SD 17.4 years). For the symptom app, the final model included the predictors age, attitude toward technology, and fear of COVID-19. The model had an r2 of 0.141. The final model for the tracing app included the same predictors and had an r2 of 0.156. The main reason to use both mobile apps was to control the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Concerns about privacy was mentioned as the main reason to not use the mobile apps.

CONCLUSIONS

Age, attitude toward technology, and fear of COVID-19 are important predictors of the acceptance of COVID-19 mobile apps for symptom recognition and monitoring and for contact tracing. These predictors should be taken into account during the development and implementation of these mobile apps to secure acceptance.

摘要

背景

电子健康应用程序已被视为降低新冠病毒有效繁殖数的宝贵工具。决定新冠病毒应用程序接受度的因素尚不清楚。隐私问题是个例外。

目的

本文旨在通过对荷兰公民进行在线调查,确定(1)一款用于新冠病毒症状识别和监测的移动应用程序以及(2)一款用于接触者追踪的移动应用程序的接受度的前因。

方法

除了人口统计学信息外,在线调查还包含了关注感知健康、对新冠病毒的恐惧以及使用意愿的问题。我们通过社交媒体帖子和个人关系进行滚雪球抽样。为了确定这两款移动应用程序接受度模型的前因,我们进行了多元线性回归分析。

结果

共有238名荷兰成年人完成了调查;59.2%(n = 141)的受访者为女性,平均年龄为45.6岁(标准差17.4岁)。对于症状应用程序,最终模型包括预测因素年龄、对技术的态度以及对新冠病毒的恐惧。该模型的r2为0.141。追踪应用程序的最终模型包括相同的预测因素,r2为0.156。使用这两款移动应用程序的主要原因是控制新冠病毒的传播。对隐私的担忧被提及为不使用移动应用程序的主要原因。

结论

年龄、对技术的态度以及对新冠病毒的恐惧是接受用于症状识别和监测以及接触者追踪的新冠病毒移动应用程序的重要预测因素。在开发和实施这些移动应用程序时应考虑这些预测因素,以确保获得接受度。