• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合及机器学习方法用于预测心肌梗死后患者的心律失常风险

Combined and Machine Learning Approaches Toward Predicting Arrhythmic Risk in Post-infarction Patients.

作者信息

Maleckar Mary M, Myklebust Lena, Uv Julie, Florvaag Per Magne, Strøm Vilde, Glinge Charlotte, Jabbari Reza, Vejlstrup Niels, Engstrøm Thomas, Ahtarovski Kiril, Jespersen Thomas, Tfelt-Hansen Jacob, Naumova Valeriya, Arevalo Hermenegild

机构信息

Computational Physiology, Simula Research Laboratory, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Cardiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 8;12:745349. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.745349. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fphys.2021.745349
PMID:34819872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8606551/
Abstract

Remodeling due to myocardial infarction (MI) significantly increases patient arrhythmic risk. Simulations using patient-specific models have shown promise in predicting personalized risk for arrhythmia. However, these are computationally- and time- intensive, hindering translation to clinical practice. Classical machine learning (ML) algorithms (such as K-nearest neighbors, Gaussian support vector machines, and decision trees) as well as neural network techniques, shown to increase prediction accuracy, can be used to predict occurrence of arrhythmia as predicted by simulations based solely on infarct and ventricular geometry. We present an initial combined image-based patient-specific and machine learning methodology to assess risk for dangerous arrhythmia in post-infarct patients. Furthermore, we aim to demonstrate that simulation-supported data augmentation improves prediction models, combining patient data, computational simulation, and advanced statistical modeling, improving overall accuracy for arrhythmia risk assessment. MRI-based computational models were constructed from 30 patients 5 days post-MI (the "baseline" population). In order to assess the utility biophysical model-supported data augmentation for improving arrhythmia prediction, we augmented the virtual baseline patient population. Each patient ventricular and ischemic geometry in the baseline population was used to create a subfamily of geometric models, resulting in an expanded set of patient models (the "augmented" population). Arrhythmia induction was attempted via programmed stimulation at 17 sites for each virtual patient corresponding to AHA LV segments and simulation outcome, "arrhythmia," or "no-arrhythmia," were used as ground truth for subsequent statistical prediction (machine learning, ML) models. For each patient geometric model, we measured and used choice data features: the myocardial volume and ischemic volume, as well as the segment-specific myocardial volume and ischemia percentage, as input to ML algorithms. For classical ML techniques (ML), we trained k-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, logistic regression, xgboost, and decision tree models to predict the simulation outcome from these geometric features alone. To explore neural network ML techniques, we trained both a three - and a four-hidden layer multilayer perceptron feed forward neural networks (NN), again predicting simulation outcomes from these geometric features alone. ML and NN models were trained on 70% of randomly selected segments and the remaining 30% was used for validation for both baseline and augmented populations. Stimulation in the baseline population (30 patient models) resulted in reentry in 21.8% of sites tested; in the augmented population (129 total patient models) reentry occurred in 13.0% of sites tested. ML and NN models ranged in mean accuracy from 0.83 to 0.86 for the baseline population, improving to 0.88 to 0.89 in all cases. Machine learning techniques, combined with patient-specific, image-based computational simulations, can provide key clinical insights with high accuracy rapidly and efficiently. In the case of sparse or missing patient data, simulation-supported data augmentation can be employed to further improve predictive results for patient benefit. This work paves the way for using data-driven simulations for prediction of dangerous arrhythmia in MI patients.

摘要

心肌梗死(MI)导致的心脏重塑会显著增加患者发生心律失常的风险。使用患者特异性模型进行的模拟在预测心律失常的个性化风险方面显示出了前景。然而,这些模拟计算量和时间成本都很高,阻碍了其向临床实践的转化。经典机器学习(ML)算法(如K近邻算法、高斯支持向量机和决策树)以及神经网络技术已被证明可以提高预测准确性,可用于预测仅基于梗死和心室几何形状的模拟所预测的心律失常的发生情况。我们提出了一种基于图像的初步患者特异性和机器学习相结合的方法,以评估心肌梗死后患者发生危险心律失常的风险。此外,我们旨在证明模拟支持的数据增强可改善预测模型,将患者数据、计算模拟和先进的统计建模相结合,提高心律失常风险评估的整体准确性。基于MRI构建了30例心肌梗死后5天患者的计算模型(“基线”人群)。为了评估生物物理模型支持的数据增强对改善心律失常预测的效用,我们对虚拟基线患者人群进行了增强。基线人群中每个患者的心室和缺血几何形状被用于创建几何模型的子族,从而得到一组扩展的患者模型(“增强”人群)。通过对每个虚拟患者对应于美国心脏协会(AHA)左心室节段的17个部位进行程控刺激来尝试诱发心律失常,模拟结果“心律失常”或“无心律失常”被用作后续统计预测(机器学习,ML)模型的真实数据。对于每个患者几何模型,我们测量并使用了以下数据特征作为ML算法的输入:心肌体积和缺血体积,以及节段特异性心肌体积和缺血百分比。对于经典ML技术(ML),我们训练了K近邻、支持向量机、逻辑回归、XGBoost和决策树模型,仅根据这些几何特征来预测模拟结果。为了探索神经网络ML技术,我们训练了一个三层和一个四层隐藏层的多层感知器前馈神经网络(NN),同样仅根据这些几何特征来预测模拟结果。ML和NN模型在随机选择的70%的节段上进行训练,其余30%用于基线和增强人群的验证。在基线人群(30个患者模型)中进行刺激,导致在所测试部位的21.8%出现折返;在增强人群(总共129个患者模型)中,在所测试部位的13.0%出现折返。对于基线人群,ML和NN模型的平均准确率在0.83至0.86之间,在所有情况下均提高到0.88至0.89。机器学习技术与患者特异性的、基于图像的计算模拟相结合,可以快速有效地提供高精度的关键临床见解。在患者数据稀疏或缺失的情况下,可以采用模拟支持的数据增强来进一步改善预测结果,以造福患者。这项工作为使用数据驱动的模拟来预测心肌梗死患者的危险心律失常铺平了道路。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/440352db03e8/fphys-12-745349-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/d77d1507fcc3/fphys-12-745349-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/26f23f07c0da/fphys-12-745349-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/b35c54275221/fphys-12-745349-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/c49cd4f46308/fphys-12-745349-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/440352db03e8/fphys-12-745349-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/d77d1507fcc3/fphys-12-745349-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/26f23f07c0da/fphys-12-745349-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/b35c54275221/fphys-12-745349-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/c49cd4f46308/fphys-12-745349-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b86/8606551/440352db03e8/fphys-12-745349-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Combined and Machine Learning Approaches Toward Predicting Arrhythmic Risk in Post-infarction Patients.联合及机器学习方法用于预测心肌梗死后患者的心律失常风险
Front Physiol. 2021 Nov 8;12:745349. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.745349. eCollection 2021.
2
Outcome prediction of intracranial aneurysm treatment by flow diverters using machine learning.使用机器学习对颅内动脉瘤血管内治疗的结果预测。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E7. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18332.
3
A feasibility study of arrhythmia risk prediction in patients with myocardial infarction and preserved ejection fraction.心肌梗死且射血分数保留患者心律失常风险预测的可行性研究
Europace. 2016 Dec;18(suppl 4):iv60-iv66. doi: 10.1093/europace/euw351.
4
Application of machine learning to predict the occurrence of arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction.机器学习在预测急性心肌梗死后心律失常发生中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Nov 2;21(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01667-8.
5
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
6
Predicting post-stroke pneumonia using deep neural network approaches.使用深度神经网络方法预测卒中后肺炎。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Dec;132:103986. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.103986. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
7
Utilizing machine learning algorithms to predict subject genetic mutation class from in silico models of neuronal networks.利用机器学习算法从神经元网络的计算模型中预测研究对象的基因突变类别。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Nov 9;22(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02038-7.
8
Use of Multiprognostic Index Domain Scores, Clinical Data, and Machine Learning to Improve 12-Month Mortality Risk Prediction in Older Hospitalized Patients: Prospective Cohort Study.使用多预后指标领域评分、临床数据和机器学习提高老年住院患者 12 个月死亡率风险预测:前瞻性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 21;23(6):e26139. doi: 10.2196/26139.
9
The Impact of Time Horizon on Classification Accuracy: Application of Machine Learning to Prediction of Incident Coronary Heart Disease.时间范围对分类准确性的影响:机器学习在预测冠心病发病中的应用。
JMIR Cardio. 2022 Nov 2;6(2):e38040. doi: 10.2196/38040.
10
Machine learning analyses can differentiate meningioma grade by features on magnetic resonance imaging.机器学习分析可以通过磁共振成像上的特征来区分脑膜瘤的级别。
Neurosurg Focus. 2018 Nov 1;45(5):E4. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.FOCUS18191.

引用本文的文献

1
Computational Medicine: What Electrophysiologists Should Know to Stay Ahead of the Curve.计算医学:电生理学家为保持领先地位应了解的知识。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2024 Dec;26(12):1393-1403. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02136-0. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Fibrosis modeling choice affects morphology of ventricular arrhythmia in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.纤维化建模选择会影响非缺血性心肌病中心室心律失常的形态。
Front Physiol. 2024 Mar 18;15:1370795. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1370795. eCollection 2024.
3
Primer on Machine Learning in Electrophysiology.

本文引用的文献

1
DeepFake electrocardiograms using generative adversarial networks are the beginning of the end for privacy issues in medicine.使用生成对抗网络的 DeepFake 心电图是医学隐私问题终结的开始。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 9;11(1):21896. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01295-2.
2
Automated Localization of Focal Ventricular Tachycardia From Simulated Implanted Device Electrograms: A Combined Physics-AI Approach.基于模拟植入式设备心电图的局灶性室性心动过速自动定位:一种物理与人工智能相结合的方法。
Front Physiol. 2021 Jul 1;12:682446. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.682446. eCollection 2021.
3
The openCARP simulation environment for cardiac electrophysiology.
电生理学中的机器学习入门
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Mar 28;12:e06. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.43. eCollection 2023.
4
Disruption of a Conservative Motif in the C-Terminal Loop of the KCNQ1 Channel Causes LQT Syndrome.C 端环保守基序缺失导致 KCNQ1 通道病。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jul 19;23(14):7953. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147953.
openCARP 心脏电生理模拟环境。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Sep;208:106223. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106223. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
Explaining deep neural networks for knowledge discovery in electrocardiogram analysis.解释在心电图分析中用于知识发现的深度神经网络。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):10949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90285-5.
5
Biophysics-based statistical learning: Application to heart and brain interactions.基于生物物理的统计学习:在心脏与大脑交互中的应用。
Med Image Anal. 2021 Aug;72:102089. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102089. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
6
Applications of artificial intelligence in cardiovascular imaging.人工智能在心血管成像中的应用。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Aug;18(8):600-609. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00527-2. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
7
Late-Gadolinium Enhancement Interface Area and Electrophysiological Simulations Predict Arrhythmic Events in Patients With Nonischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.晚期钆增强界面区和电生理模拟预测非缺血性扩张型心肌病患者的心律失常事件。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;7(2):238-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.08.036. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
8
Machine Learning in Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology.机器学习在心律失常和电生理学中的应用。
Circ Res. 2021 Feb 19;128(4):544-566. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.317872. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Learning for Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death.预防心源性猝死的学习
Circ Res. 2021 Jan 22;128(2):185-187. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.120.318576. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
10
Using machine learning to identify local cellular properties that support re-entrant activation in patient-specific models of atrial fibrillation.利用机器学习识别支持心房颤动患者特定模型中折返激活的局部细胞特性。
Europace. 2021 Mar 4;23(23 Suppl 1):i12-i20. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa386.