Pierce Kyle M, Miklavcic William R, Cook Kyle P, Hennen Mikayla Sweitzer, Bayles Kenneth W, Hollingsworth Michael A, Brooks Amanda E, Pullan Jessica E, Dailey Kaitlin M
Biomedical Sciences, Rocky Vista University, Parker, CO 80130, USA.
Eppley Institute for Cancer Research, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA.
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021 Nov 10;11(11):3018. doi: 10.3390/nano11113018.
While many classes of chemotherapeutic agents exist to treat solid tumors, few can generate a lasting response without substantial off-target toxicity despite significant scientific advancements and investments. In this review, the paths of development for nanoparticles, oncolytic viruses, and oncolytic bacteria over the last 20 years of research towards clinical translation and acceptance as novel cancer therapeutics are compared. Novel nanoparticle, oncolytic virus, and oncolytic bacteria therapies all start with a common goal of accomplishing therapeutic drug activity or delivery to a specific site while avoiding off-target effects, with overlapping methodology between all three modalities. Indeed, the degree of overlap is substantial enough that breakthroughs in one therapeutic could have considerable implications on the progression of the other two. Each oncotherapeutic modality has accomplished clinical translation, successfully overcoming the potential pitfalls promising therapeutics face. However, once studies enter clinical trials, the data all but disappears, leaving pre-clinical researchers largely in the dark. Overall, the creativity, flexibility, and innovation of these modalities for solid tumor treatments are greatly encouraging, and usher in a new age of pharmaceutical development.
虽然存在许多类用于治疗实体瘤的化疗药物,但尽管有重大的科学进步和投资,很少有药物能在不产生严重脱靶毒性的情况下产生持久反应。在这篇综述中,比较了纳米颗粒、溶瘤病毒和溶瘤细菌在过去20年的研究中朝着临床转化和被接受为新型癌症治疗方法的发展路径。新型纳米颗粒、溶瘤病毒和溶瘤细菌疗法都始于一个共同目标,即实现治疗药物活性或递送至特定部位,同时避免脱靶效应,这三种模式之间存在重叠的方法。事实上,重叠程度足够大,以至于一种治疗方法的突破可能对其他两种治疗方法的进展产生重大影响。每种肿瘤治疗模式都已完成临床转化,成功克服了有前景的治疗方法面临的潜在陷阱。然而,一旦研究进入临床试验,数据几乎就消失了,让临床前研究人员基本上蒙在鼓里。总体而言,这些实体瘤治疗模式的创造性、灵活性和创新性非常令人鼓舞,并开创了药物开发的新时代。