• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

丙酸氟替卡松与布地奈德治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病致肺炎风险的比较:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of Risk of Pneumonia Caused by Fluticasone Propionate versus Budesonide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.

Department of Biostatistics, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Nov 25;16:3229-3237. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S332151. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.2147/COPD.S332151
PMID:34858023
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8629914/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) play an important role in lowering the risk of acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, ICSs are known to increase the risk of pneumonia. Moreover, previous studies have shown that the incidence rate of pneumonia varies depending on the type of ICS. In this study, the risk of pneumonia according to the type of ICS was investigated in a population-based cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using claims data of the entire population from the Korean National Health Insurance Service. Patients who were newly diagnosed with COPD and prescribed fluticasone propionate or budesonide were enrolled as study subjects. Cumulative doses of ICSs were classified into categorical variables to analyze the risk of pneumonia within identical ICS doses.

RESULTS

A total of 47,473 subjects were identified and allocated as 14,518 fluticasone propionate and 14,518 budesonide users through 1:1 propensity score matching. Fluticasone propionate users were more likely to develop pneumonia than budesonide users (14.22% vs 10.66%, p<0.0001). The incidence rate per 100,000 person-years was 2,914.77 for fluticasone propionate users and 2,102.90 for budesonide users. The hazard ratio (HR) of pneumonia in fluticasone propionate compared to budesonide was 1.34 (95% CI 1.26-1.43, p<0.0001). The risk of pneumonia for fluticasone propionate compared to budesonide increased with higher ICS cumulative doses: 1.06 (0.93-1.21), 1.41 (1.19-1.66), 1.41 (1.23-1.63), and 1.49 (1.33-1.66) from the lowest to highest quartiles, respectively.

CONCLUSION

ICS types and doses need to be carefully considered during treatment with ICSs in patients with COPD.

摘要

介绍

吸入性皮质类固醇(ICSs)在降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)急性加重的风险方面发挥着重要作用。然而,ICSs 已知会增加肺炎的风险。此外,先前的研究表明,肺炎的发病率因 ICS 的类型而异。在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们调查了根据 ICS 类型发生肺炎的风险。

方法

使用韩国国家健康保险服务的整个人群的索赔数据进行回顾性队列研究。将新诊断为 COPD 并开具丙酸氟替卡松或布地奈德的患者纳入研究对象。ICS 剂量的累积剂量被分类为分类变量,以分析相同 ICS 剂量范围内肺炎的风险。

结果

共确定了 47473 名患者,并通过 1:1 倾向评分匹配将其分为 14518 名丙酸氟替卡松和 14518 名布地奈德使用者。丙酸氟替卡松使用者比布地奈德使用者更容易发生肺炎(14.22%比 10.66%,p<0.0001)。丙酸氟替卡松使用者每 100000 人年的发病率为 2914.77,而布地奈德使用者为 2102.90。丙酸氟替卡松与布地奈德相比,肺炎的危害比(HR)为 1.34(95%置信区间 1.26-1.43,p<0.0001)。与布地奈德相比,丙酸氟替卡松的肺炎风险随着 ICS 累积剂量的增加而增加:从最低到最高四分位数分别为 1.06(0.93-1.21)、1.41(1.19-1.66)、1.41(1.23-1.63)和 1.49(1.33-1.66)。

结论

在 COPD 患者使用 ICS 治疗时,需要仔细考虑 ICS 的类型和剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f26/8629914/77eecc7063a3/COPD-16-3229-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f26/8629914/4118fb143dba/COPD-16-3229-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f26/8629914/f103b9b47035/COPD-16-3229-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f26/8629914/77eecc7063a3/COPD-16-3229-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f26/8629914/4118fb143dba/COPD-16-3229-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f26/8629914/f103b9b47035/COPD-16-3229-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3f26/8629914/77eecc7063a3/COPD-16-3229-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Risk of Pneumonia Caused by Fluticasone Propionate versus Budesonide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study.丙酸氟替卡松与布地奈德治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病致肺炎风险的比较:一项全国性回顾性队列研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Nov 25;16:3229-3237. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S332151. eCollection 2021.
2
Risk of Pneumonia Associated with Inhaled Corticosteroid in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Korean Population-Based Study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入皮质类固醇相关肺炎风险:一项韩国基于人群的研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Dec 29;15:3397-3406. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S286149. eCollection 2020.
3
Intraclass Difference in Pneumonia Risk with Fluticasone and Budesonide in COPD: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Direct-Comparison Studies.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中氟替卡松和布地奈德的肺炎风险的组间差异:来自直接比较研究证据的系统评价。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Nov 11;15:2889-2900. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S269637. eCollection 2020.
4
Risk of Tuberculosis Caused by Fluticasone Propionate versus Budesonide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Nationwide Population-Based Study.丙酸氟替卡松与布地奈德所致慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者患结核病风险的全国性基于人群的研究
J Pers Med. 2022 Jul 21;12(7):1189. doi: 10.3390/jpm12071189.
5
The association between inhaled corticosteroid and pneumonia in COPD patients: the improvement of patients' life quality with COPD in Taiwan (IMPACT) study.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者吸入性糖皮质激素与肺炎之间的关联:台湾慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者生活质量改善(IMPACT)研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 8;11:2775-2783. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S116750. eCollection 2016.
6
Scientific rationale for the possible inhaled corticosteroid intraclass difference in the risk of pneumonia in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,吸入性糖皮质激素在肺炎风险方面可能存在类内差异的科学依据。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Oct 19;12:3055-3064. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S143656. eCollection 2017.
7
Concomitant inhaled corticosteroid use and the risk of pneumonia in COPD: a matched-subgroup post hoc analysis of the UPLIFT® trial.在 COPD 患者中,同时使用吸入性皮质类固醇和肺炎风险:UPLIFT®试验的匹配亚组事后分析。
Respir Res. 2018 Oct 5;19(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0874-0.
8
Risks of pneumonia in patients with asthma taking inhaled corticosteroids.哮喘患者吸入皮质类固醇的肺炎风险。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Mar 1;183(5):589-95. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201005-0694OC. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
9
Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Inhaled Corticosteroid and Long-Acting β-Agonist Combinations in Patients With COPD.比较 COPD 患者吸入皮质类固醇和长效β激动剂联合治疗的安全性和有效性。
Chest. 2020 May;157(5):1117-1129. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.006. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
10
Inhaled corticosteroids and risk of pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.吸入性皮质类固醇与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺炎风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2019 Dec;77:105950. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105950. Epub 2019 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Budesonide-Formoterol Metered-Dose Inhaler vs Fluticasone-Salmeterol Dry-Powder Inhaler.布地奈德-福莫特罗定量气雾剂与氟替卡松-沙美特罗干粉吸入剂的比较
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Jul 7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.2299.
2
Eosinophil count and treatment response in COPD patients.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的嗜酸性粒细胞计数与治疗反应
Lung India. 2025 Jul 1;42(4):337-342. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_630_24. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
3
Exploring the appropriateness of prescribing practice of inhaled pharmacotherapy among Aboriginal Australians in the Top End Northern Territory of Australia: a retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Inhaled Corticosteroids and the Pneumonia Risk in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.吸入性糖皮质激素与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺炎风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jun 29;12:691621. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.691621. eCollection 2021.
2
Intraclass Difference in Pneumonia Risk with Fluticasone and Budesonide in COPD: A Systematic Review of Evidence from Direct-Comparison Studies.慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)中氟替卡松和布地奈德的肺炎风险的组间差异:来自直接比较研究证据的系统评价。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Nov 11;15:2889-2900. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S269637. eCollection 2020.
3
探索澳大利亚北部顶端地区的澳大利亚原住民使用吸入性药物治疗的处方实践是否合适:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2023 Mar;10(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001508.
Blood Eosinophil Counts in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Biomarker of Inhaled Corticosteroid Effects.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的血液嗜酸性粒细胞计数:吸入性糖皮质激素疗效的生物标志物
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2020 Jul;83(3):185-194. doi: 10.4046/trd.2020.0026. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Inhaled Steroids, Circulating Eosinophils, Chronic Airway Infection, and Pneumonia Risk in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. A Network Analysis.吸入性类固醇、循环嗜酸性粒细胞、慢性气道感染与慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺炎风险:网络分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 May 1;201(9):1078-1085. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1550OC.
5
Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Bronchodilators Revisited.重新审视支气管扩张剂的药理学和治疗学
Pharmacol Rev. 2020 Jan;72(1):218-252. doi: 10.1124/pr.119.018150.
6
Inhaled corticosteroids and risk of pneumonia in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.吸入性皮质类固醇与慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺炎风险:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2019 Dec;77:105950. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2019.105950. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids in COPD patients: rationale and algorithms.COPD 患者吸入性皮质类固醇的撤药:原理和方案。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Jun 10;14:1267-1280. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S207775. eCollection 2019.
8
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) in COPD: time for a reappraisal.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中的三联疗法(吸入性糖皮质激素/长效β2受体激动剂/长效抗胆碱能药物):是时候重新评估了。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 12;13:3971-3981. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S185975. eCollection 2018.
9
Direct and Indirect Costs of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Korea.韩国慢性阻塞性肺疾病的直接和间接成本
Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2019 Jan;82(1):27-34. doi: 10.4046/trd.2018.0035. Epub 2018 Sep 28.
10
Adherence to GOLD guidelines in real-life COPD management in the Puglia region of Italy.意大利普利亚地区慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)实际管理中对全球慢性阻塞性肺疾病倡议(GOLD)指南的遵循情况。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Aug 15;13:2455-2462. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S157779. eCollection 2018.