Kowalski Alysse J, Kuhn Ann Pulling, Lane Hannah G, Trude Angela C B, Selam Helina, Hager Erin R, Black Maureen M
University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Baltimore, MD.
Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences Durham, NC.
Public Health Nutr. 2021 Dec 10;25(6):1-23. doi: 10.1017/S136898002100481X.
The objective was to examine risk and protective factors associated with pre- to early-pandemic changes in risk of household food insecurity (FI).
We re-enrolled families from two statewide studies (2017-2020) in an observational cohort (May-August 2020). Caregivers reported on risk of household FI, demographics, pandemic-related hardships, and participation in safety net programs (e.g. CARES stimulus payment, school meals).
Maryland, United States.
Economically, geographically, and racially/ethnically diverse families with preschool to adolescent-age children. Eligibility included reported receipt or expected receipt of the CARES stimulus payment or a pandemic-related economic hardship (n=496).
Prevalence of risk of FI was unchanged (pre-pandemic: 22%, early-pandemic: 25%, p=0.27). Risk of early-pandemic FI was elevated for non-Hispanic Black (aRR=2.1 [95% CI 1.1, 4.0]) and Other families (aRR=2.6 [1.3, 5.4]) and families earning ≤300% federal poverty level. Among pre-pandemic food secure families, decreased income, job loss, and reduced hours were associated with increased early-pandemic FI risk (aRR=2.1 [1.2, 3.6] to 2.5 [1.5, 4.1]); CARES stimulus payment (aRR=0.5 [0.3, 0.9]) and continued school meal participation (aRR=0.2 [0.1, 0.9]) were associated with decreased risk. Among families at risk of FI pre-pandemic, safety net program participation was not associated with early-pandemic FI risk.
The CARES stimulus payment and continued school meal participation protected pre-pandemic food secure families from early-pandemic FI risk but did not protect families who were at risk of FI pre-pandemic. Mitigating pre-pandemic FI risk and providing stimulus payments and school meals may support children's health and reduce disparities in response to pandemics.
本研究旨在探讨与家庭粮食不安全(FI)风险在疫情前至疫情早期变化相关的风险因素和保护因素。
我们从两项全州范围的研究(2017 - 2020年)中重新招募家庭,组成一个观察性队列(2020年5月至8月)。照料者报告家庭FI风险、人口统计学特征、与疫情相关的困难以及参与安全网项目的情况(如《新冠病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》刺激款项、学校餐食)。
美国马里兰州。
有学龄前至青少年子女、经济、地理和种族/族裔背景各异的家庭。入选条件包括报告已收到或预计会收到《新冠病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》刺激款项或与疫情相关的经济困难(n = 496)。
FI风险的患病率没有变化(疫情前:22%,疫情早期:25%,p = 0.27)。非西班牙裔黑人家庭(调整后风险比[aRR]=2.1[95%置信区间(CI)1.1, 4.0])和其他家庭(aRR = 2.6[1.3, 5.4])以及收入≤联邦贫困线300%的家庭,在疫情早期出现FI的风险升高。在疫情前粮食安全的家庭中,收入减少、失业和工作时长减少与疫情早期FI风险增加相关(aRR = 2.1[1.2, 3.6]至2.5[1.5, 4.1]);《新冠病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》刺激款项(aRR = 0.5[0.3, 0.9])和持续参与学校餐食计划(aRR = 0.2[0.1, 0.9])与风险降低相关。在疫情前有FI风险的家庭中,参与安全网项目与疫情早期FI风险无关。
《新冠病毒援助、救济和经济安全法案》刺激款项和持续参与学校餐食计划保护了疫情前粮食安全的家庭免受疫情早期FI风险的影响,但未能保护疫情前有FI风险的家庭。减轻疫情前的FI风险并提供刺激款项和学校餐食可能有助于儿童健康,并减少应对疫情时的差异。