UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium.
Modus Outcomes, Letchworth Garden City, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 Aug 3;61(8):3329-3340. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab920.
This study aimed to implement a patient-centred and evidence-based approach to develop a novel patient-reported outcome (PRO) instrument to measure fatigue in patients with SLE.
A three-step mixed methods psychometric (MMP) approach was followed. Steps comprised first draft item generation and review using interview data; evaluation and refinement of second draft items using mixed methods data, including interview and quantitative data from a phase 2 clinical study in SLE analysed using Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT) analysis; and evaluation of the final FATIGUE-PRO items using RMT and complementary Classical Test Theory (CTT) analyses. Guided by MMP criteria, a team of clinicians and outcome-measurement experts assessed evidence to inform instrument development.
Step 1 culminated in 55 items (n = 39 patients interviewed). Their refinement in step 2 using mixed methods evidence led to the final FATIGUE-PRO instrument comprising 31 items across three scales of fatigue: physical fatigue (9 items), mental and cognitive fatigue (11 items) and susceptibility to fatigue (11 items). Qualitative (n = 43 patients) and quantitative (n = 106 patients) evidence strongly supported the scales' content comprehensiveness and targeting, item quality and fit, conceptual uniqueness and appropriateness of the response scale. The FATIGUE-PRO further benefited from excellent reliability (RMT: 0.92-0.94 and CTT: 0.95-0.96) and supportive evidence of construct validity from assessments against other PROs.
The conceptual advances, comprehensive coverage and strong psychometric properties of the FATIGUE-PRO will significantly advance the measurement and management of fatigue in SLE, both in clinical trials and routine practice.
ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), NCT02804763.
本研究旨在采用以患者为中心和基于证据的方法,开发一种新的患者报告结局(PRO)工具来测量 SLE 患者的疲劳。
采用三步混合方法心理测量学(MMP)方法。步骤包括:首先使用访谈数据生成和审查初步草案项目;使用混合方法数据(包括来自 SLE 二期临床研究的访谈和定量数据)评估和改进第二草案项目,使用 Rasch 测量理论(RMT)分析;最后使用 RMT 和补充经典测试理论(CTT)分析评估最终的疲劳 PRO 项目。由临床医生和结局测量专家组成的团队根据 MMP 标准评估证据,为工具开发提供信息。
第 1 步最终产生了 55 个项目(n=39 名接受访谈的患者)。在第 2 步使用混合方法证据进行的改进后,最终的疲劳 PRO 工具包括三个疲劳量表的 31 个项目:身体疲劳(9 个项目)、心理和认知疲劳(11 个项目)和疲劳易感性(11 个项目)。定性(n=43 名患者)和定量(n=106 名患者)证据强烈支持这些量表的内容全面性和针对性、项目质量和拟合、概念独特性和反应量表的适当性。疲劳 PRO 进一步受益于良好的可靠性(RMT:0.92-0.94 和 CTT:0.95-0.96),以及与其他 PRO 评估的结构有效性的支持性证据。
疲劳 PRO 的概念进展、全面覆盖和强大的心理测量特性将显著提高 SLE 中疲劳的测量和管理水平,无论是在临床试验还是常规实践中。
ClinicalTrials.gov(https://clinicaltrials.gov),NCT02804763。